Cited by 49Proteins in Food SystemsNanotechnology research and applicationsFood and Agricultural Sciences

Naturally occurring nanoparticles in food

Rogers, Michael Armin·2016·Current Opinion in Food Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cofs.2015.08.005

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nanoparticles have been found in foods that contain solid fats, including chocolate, margarine, and lard, demonstrating nanoscale platelets generally 200 nm long, 80 nm wide, and 20 nm thick that act as the smallest microstructural elements of the colloidal fat crystal network.

    “Nanoparticles have also been found in foods that contain solid fats, with food items including chocolate, margarine, and lard demonstrating nanoscale platelets. These nanoscale platelets are generally 200 nm long, 80 nm wide and 20 nm thick, and act as the smallest microstructural elements of the colloidal fat crystal network [27].”
  • Nanoparticles can occur in food products naturally, with a prime example being casein micelle found within the milk of mammals.

    “Nanoparticles can also occur in food products naturally, with a prime example being casein micelle, which is found within the milk of mammals.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogers, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Rogers, Michael Armin
Venue
Current Opinion in Food Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
7
Pages
14-19
ISSN
2214-7993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1456062647
Cited by
49
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Opinion in Food Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanotechnology research and applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
food nanotechnology, food processing, homogenization, milling, self-assembly, nanofibers, micelles, lipid digestion, micellization, bile salts, phospholipids, cholesterol, consumer acceptance, nanomaterials in food

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review