The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Some,” and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment
Open accessAbstract
Scalar inferences are commonly generated when a speaker uses a weaker expression rather than a stronger alternative, e.g., John ate some of the apples implies that he did not eat them all. This article describes a visual-world study investigating how and when perceivers compute these inferences. Participants followed spoken instructions containing the scalar quantifier some directing them to interact with one of several referential targets (e.g., Click on the girl who has some of the balloons). Participants fixated on the target compatible with the implicated meaning of some and avoided a competitor compatible with the literal meaning prior to a disambiguating noun. Further, convergence on the target was as fast for some as for the non-scalar quantifiers none and all. These findings indicate that the scalar inference is computed immediately and is not delayed relative to the literal interpretation of some. It is argued that previous demonstrations that scalar inferences increase processing time are not necessarily due to delays in generating the inference itself, but rather arise because integrating the interpretation of the inference with relevant information in the context may require additional time. With sufficient contextual support, processing delays disappear.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grice, H. P. (1975) · Speech Acts · doi:10.1163/9789004368811_003 · Cited by 23,221
Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 · Cited by 12,558
Hapeman, D. E. (1991) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1991.10484817 · Cited by 9,373
(1989) · Cited by 4,498
Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models
Jaeger, T. F. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007 · Cited by 3,317 · cited 1×
“…p < .01; F2(1, 31) = 16.86, MSE = .21, p < .001; 4 Though proportions are reported, proportional measures were submitted to a log odds transform prior to ANOVA analyses (Agresti (2002); see Jaeger (2008) for a discussion of the advantages of a logit transformation compared to an arcsine transform).”
InfluentialIntegration of Visual and Linguistic Information in Spoken Language Comprehension
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7777863 · Cited by 2,929
Self-citationHajic̈ova, E. (1990) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/0024-3841(90)90064-r · Cited by 2,431
Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291091 · Cited by 2,312
Horn, L. R. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,955
Relevance: Communication and Cognition
Pust, L., Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1997) · Language · doi:10.2307/415932 · Cited by 1,903
Cited by
Predicting pragmatic reasoning in language games
Frank, M. C., & Goodman, N. D. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1218633 · Cited by 868
Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation
Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2011) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003 · Cited by 654
Pragmatic Language Interpretation as Probabilistic Inference
Goodman, N. D., & Frank, M. C. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.005 · Cited by 594
Presupposition and Implicature
Potts, C. (2015) · The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory · doi:10.1002/9781118882139.ch6 · Cited by 301
Ad-hoc Implicature in Preschool Children
Stiller, A. J., Goodman, N. D., & Frank, M. C. (2015) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2014.927328 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Grodner, D. J., Klein, N. M., Carbary, K. M., & Tanenhaus, M. K.
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 42-55
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047767695
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 98.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “Some,” and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.014
- The paper
- Grodner, D. J., Klein, N. M., Carbary, K. M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2010). “Some,” and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.