The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation
Open accessAbstract
We describe the key features of the visual world paradigm and review the main research areas where it has been used. In our discussion we highlight that the paradigm provides information about the way language users integrate linguistic information with information derived from the visual environment. Therefore the paradigm is well suited to study one of the key issues of current cognitive psychology, namely the interplay between linguistic and visual information processing. However, conclusions about linguistic processing (e.g., about activation, competition, and timing of access of linguistic representations) in the absence of relevant visual information must be drawn with caution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grice, H. P. (1975) · Speech Acts · doi:10.1163/9789004368811_003 · Cited by 23,221
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAX
Chomsky, N. (1964) · doi:10.21236/ad0616323 · Cited by 13,587
Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030 · Cited by 2,487
Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension
Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1095455 · Cited by 1,396
Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production.
Ferreira, V. S., & Pashler, H. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.6.1187 · Cited by 246
Brown‐Schmidt, S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1080/03640210802066816 · Cited by 231
Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect
Oppenheim, G. M., & Dell, G. S. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.006 · Cited by 216
Dell, G. S., & Repka, R. J. (1992) · Experimental Slips and Human Error · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-1164-3_10 · Cited by 71
Cited by
An integrated theory of language production and comprehension
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12001495 · Cited by 1,569
The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure
(2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.001.0001 · Cited by 423
Four central questions about prediction in language processing
Huettig, F. (2015) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.014 · Cited by 405
Self-citationOn staying grounded and avoiding quixotic dead ends
Barsalou, L. W. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1028-3 · Cited by 331
Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability
Hopp, H. (2013) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1177/0267658312461803 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S.
- Venue
- Acta Psychologica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 151-171
- ISSN
- 0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083408502
- Cited by
- 654
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 14.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003
- The paper
- Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
