The time course of anticipatory constraint integration
Open accessAbstract
Several studies have demonstrated that as listeners hear sentences describing events in a scene, their eye movements anticipate upcoming linguistic items predicted by the unfolding relationship between scene and sentence. While this may reflect active prediction based on structural or contextual expectations, the influence of local thematic priming between words has not been fully examined. In Experiment 1, we presented verbs (e.g., arrest) in active (Subject-Verb-Object) sentences with displays containing verb-related patients (e.g., crook) and agents (e.g., policeman). We examined patient and agent fixations following the verb, after the agent role had been filled by another entity, but prior to bottom-up specification of the object. Participants were nearly as likely to fixate agents "anticipatorily" as patients, even though the agent role was already filled. However, the patient advantage suggested simultaneous influences of both local priming and active prediction. In Experiment 2, using passive sentences (Object-Verb-Subject), we found stronger, but still graded influences of role prediction when more time elapsed between verb and target, and more syntactic cues were available. We interpret anticipatory fixations as emerging from constraint-based processes that involve both non-predictive thematic priming and active prediction.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The initial moments of competition between lexical alternatives are constrained by multiple sources of information from different dimensions of the linguistic input, including information external to the linguistic system, such as visually conveyed social information and high-level information about a speaker's linguistic ability.
“Converging evidence suggests that the initial moments of competition between lexical alternatives are constrained by multiple sources of information from different dimensions of the linguistic input (e.g., Dahan & Tanenhaus 2004; Kukona et al. 2011), including information external to the linguistic system, such as visually conveyed social information (Hay & Drager 2010; Staum Casasanto 200”
From Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science (2013) · cites this paper as Kukona et al. 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Elman, J. L. (1990) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1402_1 · Cited by 11,212 · cited 2× · see citing works
“(2003) suggest one more alternative: simple recurrent networks (SRNs; Elman, 1990).”
BackgroundRational choice and the structure of the environment.
Simon, H. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0042769 · Cited by 5,919 · cited 2× · see citing works
“One possible alternative to Kuperberg’s dual stream framework comes from ‘‘satisficing’’ (good enough, nonmaximizing; Simon, 1956) parsing theories; the ‘‘good enough representations’’ of Ferreira and colleagues (e.”
BackgroundThe TRACE model of speech perception
McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0 · Cited by 2,940 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However , a model like TRACE ( McClelland & Elman , 1986 ) predicts such effects without explicit tracking of word onsets or offsets , or any explicit representation of a discrete set of possible completions .”
MethodIntegration of Visual and Linguistic Information in Spoken Language Comprehension
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7777863 · Cited by 2,929 · see citing works
The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.676 · Cited by 2,259 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…information impacts a listener's interpretation is a point of serious contention among theories of sentence processing (e.g., Frazier & Fodor, 1978; MacDonald, Pearlmutter, & Seidenberg, 1994), and has been the focus of considerable research in psycholinguistics (e.g., Duffy, Morris, & Rayner,…”
BackgroundExpectation-based syntactic comprehension
Lévy, R. (2007) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006 · Cited by 2,220 · cited 4× · see citing works
“But if this were so, why should it be a general property of self-organizing systems that they activate or prime representation or structure that is incompatible with predictions afforded by, for example, a word onset (in the case of rhyme activation), a role clearly having been filled (as in priming in the current stu…”
BackgroundInfluentialBrandimonte, M. A., Bruno, N., & Collina, S. (1999) · Chess and Individual Differences · doi:10.1176/ajp.156.6.815 · Cited by 2,103
Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects
Swinney, D. (1979) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(79)90355-4 · Cited by 1,631 · cited 5× · see citing works
“, Shillcock & Bard , 1993 ; Swinney , 1979 ) , we increased both in Experiment 2 .”
BackgroundResultInfluentialIncremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference.
Altmann, G., & Kamide, Y. (1999) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00059-1 · Cited by 1,615 · cited 15× · see citing works
“These results from the ERP literature add further credence to the possibility that in situations like those used by Altmann and Kamide (1999), ''anticipation'' of cake given The boy will eat. . . could be driven at least in part by local priming of thematic (or event or situation) knowledge at the…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAllopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J., & Tanenhaus, M. (1998) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2558 · Cited by 1,600 · cited 3× · see citing works
“This would be analogous to fixations to rhymes in spoken word recognition studies (e.g., looking at speaker given the unambiguous input beaker; Allopenna et al., 1998).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationProcessing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech
Marslen‐Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(78)90018-x · Cited by 1,421 · see citing works
The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model
Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(78)90002-1 · Cited by 1,348 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…of when contextual information impacts a listener's interpretation is a point of serious contention among theories of sentence processing (e.g., Frazier & Fodor, 1978; MacDonald, Pearlmutter, & Seidenberg, 1994), and has been the focus of considerable research in psycholinguistics (e.g.,…”
BackgroundDeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Marta Kutas, A. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1504 · Cited by 1,236 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…(an ERP component that is sensitive to how surprising a word is) upon encountering a determiner that does not fit with an expected upcoming noun (DeLong et al., 2005; see also Wicha, Moreno, & Kutas, 2004, and for related results in Dutch, see Van Berkum, Brown, Zwitserlood, Kooijman, &…”
BackgroundDistributed memory and the representation of general and specific information.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. (1985) · Journal of experimental psychology. General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.114.2.159 · Cited by 1,160 · cited 1× · see citing works
“( 1997 ) also suggest that the distributed memory model of McClelland and Rumelhart ( 1985 ) might provide a good framework for priming based on thematic fit .”
BackgroundThe independence of syntactic processing
Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C. (1986) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(86)90006-9 · Cited by 1,151 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…Fodor, 1978; MacDonald, Pearlmutter, & Seidenberg, 1994), and has been the focus of considerable research in psycholinguistics (e.g., Duffy, Morris, & Rayner, 1988; Ferreira & Clifton, 1986; Swinney, 1979; Tanenhaus, Leiman, & Seidenberg, 1979; Tanenhaus, Spivey-Knowlton, Eberhard, & Sedivy, 1995).”
A probabilistic earley parser as a psycholinguistic model
Hale, J. (2001) · Second meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Language technologies 2001 - NAACL '01 · doi:10.3115/1073336.1073357 · Cited by 1,150 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Such views would not predict activation of representations that are compatible with already-filled roles.”
BackgroundDistributed memory and the representation of general and specific information.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1985) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.114.2.159 · Cited by 1,129 · see citing works
Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax
Kuperberg, G. R. (2006) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.063 · Cited by 1,033 · cited 5× · see citing works
“One possibly fruitful question for future research is whether the SOPARSE architecture might provide a unifying framework encompassing both hypothesized streams (Kuperberg, 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialKamide, Y., Altmann, G., & Haywood, S. L. (2003) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/s0749-596x(03)00023-8 · Cited by 947 · cited 2× · see citing works
“While Kamide, Altmann, et al. (2003) discuss the possibility that anticipatory fixations could result from a system that does not actively predict upcoming referents, they argue that their results are most consistent with ''an incremental processor that establishes the fullest possible…”
BackgroundResultAnticipating Upcoming Words in Discourse: Evidence From ERPs and Reading Times.
Berkum, J. J. A. V., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Peter Hagoort, A. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443 · Cited by 932 · see citing works
Cooper, R. (1974) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(74)90005-x · Cited by 836 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Listeners' eye movements are monitored as they view (and often interact with) a visual scene and listen to speech (for a related precursor, see Cooper, 1974).”
BackgroundModeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension
McRae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2543 · Cited by 742 · see citing works
Spivey, M. J. (2008) · doi:10.5860/choice.45-4685 · Cited by 737 · cited 1×
“Spivey ( 2007 ) visualizes the state of a recurrent network over time as points in a many dimen - sional space ( e . g .”
BackgroundLexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading
Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1988) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(88)90066-6 · Cited by 631 · see citing works
Mirman, D., Dixon, J., & Magnuson, J. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.006 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
Self-citationWicha, N., Moreno, E., & Kutas, M. (2004) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/0898929041920487 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
An alternative view of the mental lexicon
Elman, J. L. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.003 · Cited by 480 · cited 2× · see citing works
“' ' acknowl - edge ' ' senses of ' ' admit ' ' ) indicated by a sentence context in turn affects parsing preferences ( Hare , McRae , & Elman , 2003 , 2004 ) , and verb aspect ( ' ' was skating ' ' vs .”
BackgroundElectrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences.
Kuperberg, G., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D., & Holcomb, P. (2003) · Brain research. Cognitive brain research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00086-7 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. (2005) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.003 · Cited by 445 · cited 6× · see citing works
“The impact of lexical priming is observable even as a word is unfolding ( Huettig & Altmann , 2005 ; Yee & Sedivy , 2006 ) .”
BackgroundInfluentialOn the Meaning of Words and Dinosaur Bones: Lexical Knowledge Without a Lexicon
Elman, J. L. (2009) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01023.x · Cited by 436 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…, thematic and other aspects of linguistic knowledge would constitute features at varying time scales , that would be simultaneously embedded statisti - cally within the patterns of connectivity within the net - work without explicit levels of representation ( see also Elman , 2004 , 2009 ) .”
BackgroundAltmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (2007) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.12.004 · Cited by 434 · cited 16× · see citing works
“…to afford robust prediction of upcoming syntactic constituents and even specific words (for related results, see Pearlmutter & MacDonald, 1995), and have motivated theories that posit active forecasting mechanisms in sentence processing (e.g., Altmann & Kamide, 2007; Knoeferle & Crocker, 2007).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialMacWhinney, B. (1999) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410602367 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Integrating Verbs, Situation Schemas, and Thematic Role Concepts
Ferretti, T. R., McRae, K., & Hatherell, A. (2001) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2728 · Cited by 414 · cited 4× · see citing works
“While their studies have revealed that accessing a word triggers activation of rich thematic and event knowledge (Ferretti et al., 2001; McRae et al., 2005), they have also shown that there is a subtle and complex interplay between such priming, and mechanisms of ongoing sentence processing that they explain via const…”
BackgroundInfluentialSeeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
Hoeks, J., Stowe, L., & Doedens, G. (2004) · Brain research. Cognitive brain research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.022 · Cited by 400 · cited 3× · see citing works
“For example, Kim and Osterhout (2005) pitted syntactic cues against semantic cues to thematic role in sentences like The meal was devouring. . .: while syntactic features of meal suggest that the verb is semantically anomalous (e.g., cooking would be more appropriate), semantic cues suggest the verb should be in past…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialProbabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution
MacDonald, M. C. (1994) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690969408402115 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Incrementality and Prediction in Human Sentence Processing
Altmann, G. T. M., & Mirković, J. (2009) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01022.x · Cited by 369 · cited 4× · see citing works
“, Altmann & Mirkovic , 2009 ) .”
BackgroundResultInfluentialKamide, Y., Scheepers, C., & Altmann, G. (2003) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1023/a:1021933015362 · Cited by 344 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Kamide, Scheepers, and Altmann (2003) used a visual world design which included such items: their displays depicted sets like a hare, fox, cabbage, and tree, and their sentences described one of the items (e.g., hare) in differing thematic roles in an active (e.g., The hare will eat the cabbage)…”
MethodEye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition.
Yee, E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.1 · Cited by 327 · cited 8× · see citing works
“The impact of lexical priming is observable even as a word is unfolding ( Huettig & Altmann , 2005 ; Yee & Sedivy , 2006 ) .”
BackgroundInfluentialLearning and applying contextual constraints in sentence comprehension
St. John, M. F., & McClelland, J. L. (1990) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(90)90008-n · Cited by 322 · cited 1× · see citing works
“John & McClelland , 1990 ) , since both have been construed as models of role filling ( though neither framework is lim - ited to such scope ) , and both have logically assumed for - ward directionality .”
BackgroundThe independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials
Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.10.002 · Cited by 319 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…system may require two loosely interacting streams ( lexical - semantic and morphosyntactic – thematic ) as suggested by Kuperberg ( 2007 ; see also Kim & Osterhout , 2005 ) , or it may be possible for both local priming and forward - directed prediction to emerge within a single self -…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThematic Roles as Verb-specific Concepts
McRae, K., & Ferretti, T. R. (1997) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/016909697386835 · Cited by 296 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Some of our items were based on materials from McRae et al. (1997, 1998) and Binder, Duffy, and Rayner (2001). Each verb was grouped with seven animate nouns: some nouns were good agent or patient candidates, some were poor candidates, and some were included to fall in the middle of the typicality scale.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input
Lévy, R., Bicknell, K., Slattery, T. J., & Rayner, K. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0907664106 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution.
Chambers, C. G., Tanenhaus, M., & Magnuson, J. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.687 · Cited by 288 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, put, as in Chambers et al., 2004, or return, as in Chambers & San Juan, 2008). Let us emphasize again that we are not excluding a role for prediction based upon context-specific evaluation of verb and object properties. As Chambers et al. put it, highly specific and possibly never experienced non-linguistic scene an…”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Coordinated Interplay of Scene, Utterance, and World Knowledge: Evidence From Eye Tracking
Knoeferle, P., & Crocker, M. W. (2006) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_65 · Cited by 279 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Our findings are complementary to those of Knoeferle and Crocker ( 2006 , 2007 ) .”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSentence comprehension: A parallel distributed processing approach
McClelland, J. L., John, M. S., & Taraban, R. (1989) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690968908406371 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
The Dynamics of Lexical Competition During Spoken Word Recognition
Magnuson, J., Dixon, J., Tanenhaus, M., & Aslin, R. (2007) · Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1080/03640210709336987 · Cited by 253
Self-citationA basis for generating expectancies for verbs from nouns
McRae, K., Hare, M. L., Elman, J. L., & Ferretti, T. R. (2005) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03193221 · Cited by 248 · cited 2× · see citing works
“While their studies have revealed that accessing a word triggers activation of rich thematic and event knowledge (Ferretti et al., 2001; McRae et al., 2005), they have also shown that there is a subtle and complex interplay between such priming, and mechanisms of ongoing sentence processing that they explain via const…”
BackgroundEffects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing
Tabor, W., Galantucci, B., & Richardson, D. C. (2004) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.01.001 · Cited by 243 · cited 10× · see citing works
“In SOPARSE , local information can compete quite powerfully with global ( longer time scale ) information related via a set of linked treelets activated by the input thus far .”
BackgroundInfluentialThe time course of spoken word learning and recognition: studies with artificial lexicons.
Magnuson, J., Tanenhaus, M., Aslin, R., & Dahan, D. (2003) · Journal of experimental psychology. General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.202 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Self-citationDahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M. (2005) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03193787 · Cited by 230 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…, with the words that we have heard , whether based on the - matic role compatibility ( Altmann & Kamide , 1999 ) , visual features of objects ( Dahan & Tanenhaus , 2005 ) , depicted or implied event information ( Altmann & Kamide , 2007 ; Knoeferle & Crocker , 2006 , 2007 ) , category (…”
BackgroundDahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.498 · Cited by 214 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In general , for effects to be detect - able immediately , constraints must be overwhelmingly strong , whether they are based on lexical priming , or linguis - tic ( Dahan & Tanenhaus , 2004 ) , scene ( Altmann & Kamide , 1999 ) , or pragmatic ( Magnuson et al .”
BackgroundAn Attractor Model of Lexical Conceptual Processing: Simulating Semantic Priming
Cree, G. S., McRae, K., & McNorgan, C. (1999) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2303_4 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Cree, G. S., & McRae, K. (2003) · Journal of experimental psychology. General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.163 · Cited by 206 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, Cree & McRae , 2003 ; Cree , McRae , & McNorgan , 1999 ; O ' Connor , McRae , & Cree , 2006 ) , or a re - lated attractor framework tailored to sequential processing of spoken input ( Plaut & Kello , 1999 ) .”
BackgroundAltmann, G., & Kamide, Y. (2009) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.005 · Cited by 204 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In - stead , consistent with Altmann and Kamide ( 2007 , 2009 ) , lexical , syntactic , thematic and other aspects of linguistic knowledge would constitute features at varying time scales , that would be simultaneously embedded statisti - cally within the patterns of connectivity within the net -…”
BackgroundIndividual Differences and Probabilistic Constraints in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution
Pearlmutter, N., & MacDonald, M. (1995) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1024 · Cited by 198 · cited 3× · see citing works
“At first glance, our results may appear consistent with the classical view of context integration proposed by Swinney (1979) and Tanenhaus et al.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialVerb aspect and the activation of event knowledge.
Ferretti, T. R., Kutas, M., & McRae, K. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.182 · Cited by 193 · cited 3× · see citing works
“, 2005; Ferretti et al., 2001; Knoeferle & Crocker, 2006, 2007) provide strong evidence for anticipation based on forecasting. However, such results do not rule out the possibility of important contributions of local thematic priming in addition (cf. Kuperberg, 2007). The complexity required of a forecasting mechanism…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialPlaying on the typewriter, typing on the piano: manipulation knowledge of objects.
Myung, J., Blumstein, S., & Sedivy, J. C. (2006) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.010 · Cited by 187 · cited 3× · see citing works
“At the other end of the continuum, we have fixations to items in a display that are semantically related to a named target, but that have no other connection to the unfolding language or the task at hand (Dahan & Tanenhaus, 2005; Huettig & Altmann, 2005; Myung et al., 2006; Yee & Sedivy, 2006).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialCognitive models of speech processing : the Second Sperlonga Meeting
Altmann, G., & Shillcock, R. (1993) · doi:10.4324/9780203775745 · Cited by 170 · cited 2×
“However , the original interpretation of these results no longer holds ; Shillcock and Bard ( 1993 ) demonstrated that immediate context - selective priming is obtained when constraints are sub - stantially stronger than those used in the 1979 studies ( see also Magnuson et al .”
BackgroundResultSense and structure: Meaning as a determinant of verb subcategorization preferences
Hare, M. L., McRae, K., & Elman, J. L. (2003) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/s0749-596x(02)00516-8 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Evidence for Self-Organized Sentence Processing: Digging-In Effects.
Tabor, W., & Hutchins, S. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.431 · Cited by 147 · cited 8× · see citing works
“In SOPARSE , local information can compete quite powerfully with global ( longer time scale ) information related via a set of linked treelets activated by the input thus far .”
BackgroundInfluentialThe influence of recent scene events on spoken comprehension: Evidence from eye movements
Knoeferle, P., & Crocker, M. W. (2007) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.01.003 · Cited by 147 · cited 7× · see citing works
“…to afford robust prediction of upcoming syntactic constituents and even specific words (for related results, see Pearlmutter & MacDonald, 1995), and have motivated theories that posit active forecasting mechanisms in sentence processing (e.g., Altmann & Kamide, 2007; Knoeferle & Crocker, 2007).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialMapping across Domains Without Feedback: A Neural Network Model of Transfer of Implicit Knowledge
Dienes, Z. P., Altmann, G. T. M., & Gao, S. (1999) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/s0364-0213(99)80052-4 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
The Effects of Thematic Fit and Discourse Context on Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution
Binder, K. S., Duffy, S. A., & Rayner, K. (2001) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2754 · Cited by 88 · cited 1× · see citing works
“( 1997 , 1998 ) and Binder , Duffy , and Rayner ( 2001 ) .”
Admitting that admitting verb sense into corpus analyses makes sense
Hare, M., McRae, K., & Elman, J. (2004) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960344000152 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
The Morton-Massaro law of information integration: Implications for models of perception.
Movellan, J. R., & McClelland, J. L. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.113 · Cited by 71 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Here , we appeal to the distinction between exploitation ( maximization ) vs . exploration ( Movellan & McClelland , 2001 ) .”
BackgroundResultThe Repetition-Break Plot Structure: A Cognitive Influence on Selection in the Marketplace of Ideas
Loewenstein, J., & Heath, C. (2009) · Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2008.01001.x · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Chambers, C. G., & Juan, V. S. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.009 · Cited by 55 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Chambers and San Juan (2008) have also demonstrated that anticipatory eye movements are driven by dynamic, ''situation-specific'' knowledge concerning the relationship between scene and sentence.”
BackgroundImmediate effects of form-class constraints on spoken word recognition
Magnuson, J., Tanenhaus, M., & Aslin, R. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.005 · Cited by 42 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In general, for effects to be detectable immediately, constraints must be overwhelmingly strong, whether they are based on lexical priming, or linguistic (Dahan & Tanenhaus, 2004), scene (Altmann & Kamide, 1999), or pragmatic (Magnuson et al., 2008) context.”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
10 of the 78 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Altmann GTM Kamide Y Henderson J Ferreira F 2004 Now you see it, now you don’t: mediating the mapping between language and the visual world The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world 347 386 New York Psychology Press
- Kučera H Francis W 1967 Computational analysis of present day American English Providence, RI Brown University Press
- Magnuson JS Tanenhaus MK Aslin RN Dahan D 2003 The microstructure of spoken word recognition: Studies with artificial lexicons Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 202 227 12825637
- O’Connor CM McRae K Cree GS 2006 Conceptual hierarchies arise from the dynamics of learning and processing: Insights from a flat attractor network Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2577 Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum
- Tanenhaus MK Leiman J Seidenberg M 1979 Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18 427 440
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science
Clark, A. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000477 · Cited by 5,924 · see citing works
Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review.
Pickering, M. J., & Gambi, C. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000158 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
Four central questions about prediction in language processing
Huettig, F. (2015) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.014 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Arielle Borovsky, A., Elman, J. L., & Fernald, A. E. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.01.005 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Huettig, F., & Janse, E. (2015) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1047459 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems.
Mirman, D., Landrigan, J.-F., & Britt, A. E. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000092 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension
Metusalem, R., Marta Kutas, A., Urbach, T. P., Hare, M. L., McRae, K., & Elman, J. L. (2012) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.001 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Good-enough linguistic representations and online cognitive equilibrium in language processing
Karimi, H., & Ferreira, F. (2016) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1053951 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Communicative efficiency in language production: Optional case-marking in Japanese
Kurumada, C., & Jaeger, T. F. (2015) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.03.003 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
A cognitive load delays predictive eye movements similarly during L1 and L2 comprehension
Ito, A., Corley, M. M. B., & Pickering, M. J. (2017) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728917000050 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
“To explore how predictions are affected by factors that can reduce available cognitive resources, we used the visual world eye-tracking paradigm to compare predictions between people who performed a concurrent working memory task and those who did not.”
MethodKalénine, S., Mirman, D., Middleton, E., & Buxbaum, L. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0027626 · Cited by 91
“Even more closely related to the procedure used in the present study, Kukona et al. (2011) nicely demonstrated that during sentence comprehension (e.g., “Toby arrests the . . . .”), fixations following verb presentation increase overall for semantically related objects (e.g., crook, policeman)…”
Learning to predict or predicting to learn?
Rabagliati, H., Gambi, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2015) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1077979 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Huettig, F., & Guerra, E. (2018) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2018.11.013 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Where are the cookies? Two- and three-year-olds use number-marked verbs to anticipate upcoming nouns
Lukyanenko, C., & Fisher, C. L. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.012 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
“The reports that yielded evidence for pre-activation based on a function word included longer intervals for measurement between the function word and the onset of the target noun than those that yielded negative results (see also Kukona et al., 2011).”
A “bag-of-arguments” mechanism for initial verb predictions
Chow, W.-Y., Smith, C. M., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2015) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1066832 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?
Rissman, L., & Majid, A. (2019) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01634-5 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Lee, C.-L., Middleton, E., Mirman, D., Kalénine, S., & Buxbaum, L. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/a0027533 · Cited by 72
A parallel architecture perspective on pre-activation and prediction in language processing
Huettig, F., Audring, J., & Jackendoff, R. S. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105050 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Wait a second! delayed impact of argument roles on on-line verb prediction
Chow, W.-Y., Lau, E. F., Wang, S., & Phillips, C. (2018) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2018.1427878 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“The present study extends previous eye-tracking findings by Kukona et al. (2011), who found that listeners’ anticipatory eye-movements were sensitive to filled vs.”
ResultPredictors of verb-mediated anticipatory eye movements in the visual world.
Hintz, F., Meyer, A. S., & Huettig, F. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000388 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
“Functional Versus General Word Associations Our findings of a robust role of functional associations for language-mediated anticipatory eye gaze are compatible with the findings of Kukona et al. (2011).”
ResultPrediction, explanation, and the role of generative models in language processing.
Farmer, T. A., Brown, M., & Tanenhaus, M. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12002312 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
“Converging evidence suggests that the initial moments of competition between lexical alternatives are constrained by multiple sources of information from different dimensions of the linguistic input (e.g., Dahan & Tanenhaus 2004; Kukona et al. 2011), including information external to the linguistic system, such as vis…”
BackgroundFixations in the visual world paradigm: where, when, why?
Magnuson, J. S. (2019) · Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science · doi:10.1007/s41809-019-00035-3 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationChildren and adults integrate talker and verb information in online processing.
Borovsky, A., & Creel, S. C. (2014) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035591 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
The interaction of visual and linguistic saliency during syntactic ambiguity resolution
Coco, M. I., & Keller, F. (2015) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.936475 · Cited by 50
“The results are also compatible with more recent situated understanding constraint-satisfaction accounts, which postulate locality, and temporal dependence of constraint activation (e.g., Knoeferle & Crocker, 2006; Kukona et al., 2011).”
BackgroundResultAction relevance in linguistic context drives word-induced motor activity
Aravena, P., Courson, M., Frak, V., Cheylus, A., Paulignan, Y., Déprez, V., & Nazir, T. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00163 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“The whole event evoked when processing a sentence within a given context restricts the set of potential word referents (Kako and Trueswell, 2000; Kamide et al., 2003; Chambers and Juan, 2008; Bicknell et al., 2010; Kukona et al., 2011).”
BackgroundHuang, Y., & Snedeker, J. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.31234/osf.io/huve3 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Borovsky, A., Burns, E. L., Elman, J., & Evans, J. (2013) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2013.09.001 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“One interpretation of these additional Action-Related fixations by unimpaired individuals is that they are continuing to activate items that may be locally consistent but globally implausible with the sentence-level message (Borovsky et al., 2012; Kukona et al., 2011; Tabor, Galantucci, & Richardson, 2004).”
BackgroundKukona, A., Braze, D., Johns, C. L., Mencl, W. E., Dyke, J. A. V., Magnuson, J. S., Pugh, K. R., Shankweiler, D., & Tabor, W. (2016) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.09.009 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“2 The current analyses differed from Kukona et al. (2014) in two critical respects.”
InfluentialSelf-citationBeyond associations: Sensitivity to structure in pre-schoolers’ linguistic predictions
Gambi, C., Pickering, M. J., & Rabagliati, H. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.003 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“Because structural computations will mostly be completed after 670 semantics, though, there will be situations in which predictions will only be compatible with 671 the unfolding semantic interpretation but not with the structure of the sentence (such as in 672 Kukona et al., 2011, Experiment 1).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialPrediction as memory retrieval: timing and mechanisms
Chow, W.-Y., Momma, S., Smith, C. M., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2016) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2016.1160135 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“This is helped by the existence of related findings from other experimental measures (eye-tracking: Kukona et al., 2011; speeded cloze: Chow et al., 2015).”
MethodThe psychologist said quickly, “Dialogue descriptions modulate reading speed!”
Stites, M. C., Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2012) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0248-7 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Kukona, A., & Tabor, W. (2011) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01180.x · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationPrediction of phonological and gender information: An event-related potential study in Italian
Ito, A., Gambi, C., Pickering, M. J., Fuellenbach, K., & Husband, E. M. (2019) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107291 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Sauppe, S. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00095 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“As mentioned in the introduction, when anticipating sentence-final syntactic objects, listeners could specifically predict the patient referent based on its role in the event described by the verb (cf. Kukona et al., 2012).”
BackgroundAnticipation in Real-World Scenes: The Role of Visual Context and Visual Memory
Coco, M. I., Keller, F., & Malcolm, G. (2016) · Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1111/cogs.12313 · Cited by 33
Nozari, N., Trueswell, J., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1068-8 · Cited by 33
L2 Prediction during complex sentence processing
Chun, E., & Kaan, E. (2019) · Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science · doi:10.1007/s41809-019-00038-0 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Integrating mechanisms of visual guidance in naturalistic language production
Coco, M. I., & Keller, F. (2014) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-014-0642-0 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“, scene understanding has to happen before constraints supplied by visual attention are applied to sentence production (Altmann and Kamide 1999; Knoeferle and Crocker 2007; Kukona et al. 2011).”
“Proactive” in many ways: Developmental evidence for a dynamic pluralistic approach to prediction
Mani, N., Daum, M. M., & Huettig, F. (2015) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1111395 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Prediction involves two stages: Evidence from visual-world eye-tracking
Corps, R. E., Brooke, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2021) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2021.104298 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Gambi, C., Jindal, P., Sharpe, S., Pickering, M. J., & Rabagliati, H. (2020) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13465 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Close, but no garlic: Perceptuomotor and event knowledge activation during language comprehension
Amsel, B. D., DeLong, K. A., & Kutas, M. (2015) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.03.009 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Mishra, R. K., Olivers, C. N. L., & Huettig, F. (2013) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-62604-2.00008-3 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Metusalem, R., Marta Kutas, A., Urbach, T. P., & Elman, J. L. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.004 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“, 2011), anticipatory looking behavior in the Visual World Paradigm (Borovsky et al., 2012; Kamide et al., 2003; Kukona et al., 2011) and eventrelated brain potentials (ERPs; Bicknell et al.”
BackgroundWong, R., Reichle, E. D., & Veldre, A. (2024) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-024-02588-z · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“This finding of anticipatory eye movements based on contextual information has since been replicated in a number of visual world studies (Kamide et al., 2003; Kukona et al., 2011; see Huettig et al., 2011, for a review).”
Chapter 2. Automaticity and prediction in non-native language comprehension
Ito, A., & Pickering, M. (2021) · Bilingual processing and acquisition · doi:10.1075/bpa.12.02ito · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Ito, A., & Sakai, H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.607474 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Müller, J., Wendt, D., Kollmeier, B., & Brand, T. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164627 · Cited by 22
“Other studies, which analyzed their data with GCA used lower order polynomials, due to less complex data [37, 38, 39].”
ResultDecroix, J., & Kalénine, S. (2019) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01784-7 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Interpreting prosodic cues in discourse context
Brown, M., Salverda, A. P., Gunlogson, C. A., & Tanenhaus, M. (2013) · Language, Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/01690965.2013.862285 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Milburn, E. A., Warren, T. C., & Dickey, M. W. (2015) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1117117 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
The role of language production in making predictions during comprehension
Lelonkiewicz, J. R., Rabagliati, H., & Pickering, M. J. (2021) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218211028438 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“More importantly, there is evidence that prediction can be achieved without the contribution of forward models (i.e., comprehenders might predict based on the activation of event schemes; Amsel et al., 2015; Kukona et al., 2011; Metusalem et al., 2012).”
BackgroundIto, A. (2024) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2024.104553 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Predicting (variability of) context effects in language comprehension
Knoeferle, P. (2019) · Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science · doi:10.1007/s41809-019-00025-5 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Dresang, H. C., Dickey, M. W., & Warren, T. C. (2019) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643294.2019.1656604 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“Semantic memory for events is automatically activated when neurotypical adults hear or read isolated words (Matsuki et al., 2011; Kukona et al., 2011); Verbs prime (activate) typical agents, themes, and instruments associated with the events those verbs denote, and vice-versa (Hare, Jones, Thomson, Kelly & McRae, 2009…”
BackgroundThe interaction of grammatically distinct agreement dependencies in predictive processing
Stone, K., Veríssimo, J., Schad, D. J., Oltrogge, E., Vasishth, S., & Lago, S. (2021) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2021.1921816 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“One such case concerns the interaction between visual and sentence-level information (Knoeferle & Crocker, 2006, 2007; Kukona et al., 2011, 2014; Rommers et al., 2013, 2015).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialIto, A. (2019) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021819851394 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Peters, R. E., Grüter, T., & Arielle Borovsky, A. (2018) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716418000383 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“Looks to such locally coherent items are seen in native language processing regardless of the fact that they should already have been disqualified as likely targets by the agent (Borovsky et al., 2012; Kukona et al., 2011).”
BackgroundLozano‐Argüelles, C., Sagarra, N., & Casillas, J. V. (2019) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728919000634 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Verb-argument integration in primary progressive aphasia: Real-time argument access and selection
Mack, J. E., Mesulam, M. M., Rogalski, E. J., & Thompson, C. K. (2019) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107192 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Milburn, E. A., Dickey, M. W., Warren, T. C., & Hayes, R. A. (2021) · Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1080/13825585.2021.1962791 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“This provides additional confidence that older adults’ fixations to the verb-congruent competitor in Experiment 2 reflect their automatic activation of this referent based on the verb’s coarse-grained semantic constraints, as found in previous visual-world studies (Borovsky et al., 2012; Kamide et al., 2003; Kukona et…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialA theory of prediction in simultaneous interpreting
Amos, R. M., & Pickering, M. J. (2019) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728919000671 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Karimi, H., Brothers, T. A., & Ferreira, F. (2019) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.04.001 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Information entropy facilitates (not impedes) lexical processing during language comprehension
Karimi, H., Weber, P., & Zinn, J. (2024) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-024-02463-x · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“…emerge from a “dumb” system where the preceding context simply leads to spreading activation of features that then facilitate the processing of any upcoming input that shares those features (Huettig, 2015; Karimi et al., 2019; Kukona et al., 2011; also see Kahneman, 2011; Kuperberg, 2007).”
Spoken Word Recognition: A Focus on Plasticity
Kapnoula, E. C., Jevtović, M., & Magnuson, J. S. (2023) · Annual Review of Linguistics · doi:10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031422-113507 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“…SWR and spoken language comprehension more broadly, including semantics (Altmann & Kamide 1999, Ferretti et al. 2001), local thematic information (Kukona et al. 2011), visual context (Chambers et al. 2004, Eberhard et al. 1995, Sedivy et al. 1999, Tanenhaus et al. 1995), and world knowledge…”
BackgroundSelf-citationPredictive Sentence Processing at Speed: Evidence from Online Mouse Cursor Tracking
Kukona, A. (2023) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13285 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationDevelopmental Timescale of Rapid Adaptation to Conflicting Cues in Real-Time Sentence Processing
Yazbec, A., Kaschak, M. P., & Borovsky, A. (2019) · Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1111/cogs.12704 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Prediction and Production of Simple Mathematical Equations: Evidence from Visual World Eye-Tracking
Hintz, F., & Meyer, A. S. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130766 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Predictive language comprehension in Parkinson’s disease
Aveni, K., Ahmed, J., Arielle Borovsky, A., McRae, K., Jenkins, M. E., Sprengel, K. A., Fraser, J. A., Orange, J. B., Knowles, T., & Roberts, A. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0262504 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Evidence for two stages of prediction in non-native speakers: A visual-world eye-tracking study
Corps, R. E., Liao, M., & Pickering, M. J. (2022) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728922000499 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“Our experiment involved more items than previous experiments (e.g., 28 critical sentences vs. 16 in Altmann & Kamide, 1999) and we had at least a similar number of critical trials to previous studies (e.g., Kukona et al., 2011 had 640 trials; Altmann & Kamide, 1999 had 384; we had 672).”
ResultDoes signal reduction imply predictive coding in models of spoken word recognition?
Luthra, S., Li, M. Y. C., You, H., Brodbeck, C. J., & Magnuson, J. S. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-021-01924-x · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationVanek, N., Škorić, A. M., Košutar, S., Matějka, Š., & Stone, K. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-53353-0 · Cited by 9
“Following the logic that more structural cues within a sentence can lead to more robust anticipatory eye movements to targets 36,37 , within Croatian we expected increased and earlier fixations on the factual in negative concord, followed by sentential negation.”
BackgroundRhyme as resonance in poetry comprehension: An expert–novice study
Lea, R. B., Elfenbein, A., & Rapp, D. N. (2021) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-021-01167-0 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Kamide, Y., & Kukona, A. (2018) · Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1111/cogs.12694 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Models by Hale (2001) and Levy (2008b) assume that comprehenders only distribute probabilities over grammatical parses that are compatible with the global syntactic constraints; thus, they do not predict the effects observed here.”
BackgroundSelf-citationNakamura, M., Momma, S., Sakai, H., & Phillips, C. (2024) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.70023 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Troyer, M., & Borovsky, A. (2017) · Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1111/cogs.12488 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Hintz, F., Meyer, A. S., & Huettig, F. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107409 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Using visual world eye-tracking (Huettig et al., 2011, for review), Kukona et al. (2011) provided experimental evidence supporting the notion that associations and combinatorial event information jointly contribute to anticipatory processing during comprehension.”
ResultHow Animacy and Verbal Information Influence V2 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Eye Movements
de Swart, P., & van Bergen, G. (2019) · Open Linguistics · doi:10.1515/opli-2019-0035 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Indeed, Kukona et al. (2011), also using a Visual World paradigm, found evidence for this kind of thematic priming, in addition to prediction effects based on structural characteristics.”
MethodThe neural bases of argument structure processing revealed by primed lexical decision
Lee, D., Pruce, B., & Newman, S. D. (2014) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.04.013 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Effect of repetition proportion on language-driven anticipatory eye movements
Britt, A. E., Mirman, D., Kornilov, S., & Magnuson, J. (2013) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.10.004 · Cited by 6
Self-citationVerb Vocabulary Supports Event Probability Use in Developmental Language Disorder
Kueser, J. B., Arielle Borovsky, A., Deevy, P., Muezzinoglu, M., Outzen, C., & Leonard, L. B. (2024) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2024_jslhr-23-00600 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“…work on active sentence interpretation indicates that while predicting the patient in a sentence like, “ Toby arrests the . . . , ” adults look at both “ police ” and “ crook, ” indicating that both agent-and patient-associated information is activated in response to verbs (Kukona et al., 2011).”
BackgroundMouse-tracking evidence for parallel anticipatory option evaluation
Cranford, E. A., & Moss, J. (2018) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-017-0851-4 · Cited by 5
Kowalski, A., & Huang, Y.-T. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000389 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Hung, J., Edmonds, L. A., & Reilly, J. J. (2016) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2016.1198818 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Gauvin, H. S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Huettig, F. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00818 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“…sensitivity of eye-movements to linguistic predictions in visual world studies (e.g., Altmann and Kamide, 1999; Weber et al., 2006; Kamide, 2008; Kukona et al., 2011; Mani and Huettig, 2012), 1Although it does not form part of this paper, we also successfully replicated the original Huettig and…”
ResultChapter 4. Influence of syntactic complexity on second language prediction
Chun, E., Chen, S., Liu, S., & Chan, A. (2021) · Bilingual processing and acquisition · doi:10.1075/bpa.12.04chu · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Anticipating the garden path: The horse raced past the barn ate the cake
Altmann, G. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677139.003.0003 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Ito, A. (2026) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-026-01857-7 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“In such a context, the meaning of these contextual words may cue prediction of the target word without involving event simulation (Chow et al., 2016; Kukona, 2020; Kukona et al., 2011).”
Fernandez, L. B., Shehzad, M., & Hadley, L. V. (2025) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000001679 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“…in the larger context, such looks to the verb-related image have been previously reported in college-aged adults, second language speakers, and children [Kukona et al. 2011; Borovsky et al. 2012; Peters et al. 2018], and been proposed to stem from thematic priming [Ferretti et al. 2001].”
Lee, R., Chambers, C. G., Huettig, F., & Ganea, P. A. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267297 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“This is not unexpected, however, as prediction is often accompanied by a certain degree of lexicallydriven activation even when such an effect is in principle incongruent with broader sentence or discourse information [45].”
BackgroundOltrogge, E., Veríssimo, J., Patil, U., & Lago, S. (2025) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2025.104651 · Cited by 3
Milburn, E. A., Vulchanova, M., Vulchanov, V., Saltzman, D., & Magnuson, J. S. (2026) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-025-01843-5
“…language, we tend to talk about things that are likely to happen, and therefore our knowledge about both word co-occurrences and how the world works converges, allowing us to predict upcoming words (Altmann & Kamide, 1999; Borovsky et al., 2012; Kamide et al., 2003; Kukona et al., 2011, 2016).”
Self-citationLee, E.-K. R., & Phillips, C. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106255 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Dutch–Mandarin learners’ online use of syntactic cues to anticipate mass vs. count interpretations
Yao, P.-P., Hall, D., Borer, H., & Stockall, L. (2023) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1177/02676583231175106 · Cited by 2
“This 200 ms buffer following the onset of a word is based on the mean time required to plan and launch an eye movement, and the typical lag observed between eye movements and fine-grained phonetic detail in the speech stream (Allopenna et al., 1998; Kukona et al., 2011).”
Processing Evidence for the Grammatical Encoding of the Mass/Count Distinction in Mandarin Chinese
Yao, P.-P., Stockall, L., Hall, D., & Borer, H. (2022) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-022-09844-0 · Cited by 2
Kukona, A., Cho, P. W., Magnuson, J. S., & Tabor, W. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0034903 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“, Altmann & Kamide, 1999; Chambers & San Juan, 2008; Kamide, Altmann, & Haywood, 2003; Kamide, Scheepers, & Altmann, 2003; Knoeferle & Crocker, 2006, 2007) reveal that the language processing system rapidly uses the contextual constraints to predict upcoming linguistic input, effects of context-independent information…”
InfluentialSelf-citationPrediction in language comprehension across the lifespan
Federmeier, K. D., Chiu, H., Fisher, C. L., & Yu, Y. (2026) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-026-00599-2 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Anticipatory looks can be supported by semantic priming as well as by prediction, posing challenges in isolating active prediction 33–36 .”
InfluentialSpeech rate and associations in predictive sentence processing
Kukona, A. (2025) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-025-03160-0
“In addition, complementing findings like Kukona et al. (2011, 2014), these results suggest that comprehenders preactivate lexically associated representations that are otherwise unpredictable in sentences.”
InfluentialSelf-citationMultimodal Shannon Game with Images
Zouhar, V., Bhattacharya, S., & Bojar, O. (2023) · International Conference on Machine Learning, Optimization, and Data Science · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.11192 · Cited by 1
“For [22, 23] the modality was acoustic while our input modality was text and images.”
MethodPsychological and pedagogical conditions of integration of immigrants into the German society
Krutova-Soliman, N., Romanenko, N., & Shishlova, E. (2021) · Linguistics and Culture Review · doi:10.37028/lingcure.v5ns2.1338 · Cited by 1
“Integration courses are conducted within the framework of the state order and are regulated by the current legislation (Kukona et al., 2011; Lee & Lee, 2014).”
Background
- Authors
- Kukona, A., Fang, S.-Y., Aicher, K. A., Chen, H., & Magnuson, J. S.
- Affiliations
- Haskins Laboratories (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kukona, Anuenue
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-42
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3047461
- OpenAlex
- W1983622171
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC005765, DC0055765)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-01994, F31HD060414, R01HD040353, HD-40353, HD060414, P01HD001994)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- eye movements, passive sentences, syntactic cues, time course
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Cognition, Eye Movements, Humans, Language, Reaction Time, Eye Movement Measurements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review