Cited by 139Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationReading and Literacy Development

The time course of anticipatory constraint integration

Open access
Kukona, Anuenue, Fang, Shin-Yi, Aicher, Karen A., Chen, Helen, Magnuson, James S.·2011·Cognition

Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated that as listeners hear sentences describing events in a scene, their eye movements anticipate upcoming linguistic items predicted by the unfolding relationship between scene and sentence. While this may reflect active prediction based on structural or contextual expectations, the influence of local thematic priming between words has not been fully examined. In Experiment 1, we presented verbs (e.g., arrest) in active (Subject-Verb-Object) sentences with displays containing verb-related patients (e.g., crook) and agents (e.g., policeman). We examined patient and agent fixations following the verb, after the agent role had been filled by another entity, but prior to bottom-up specification of the object. Participants were nearly as likely to fixate agents "anticipatorily" as patients, even though the agent role was already filled. However, the patient advantage suggested simultaneous influences of both local priming and active prediction. In Experiment 2, using passive sentences (Object-Verb-Subject), we found stronger, but still graded influences of role prediction when more time elapsed between verb and target, and more syntactic cues were available. We interpret anticipatory fixations as emerging from constraint-based processes that involve both non-predictive thematic priming and active prediction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.002

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The initial moments of competition between lexical alternatives are constrained by multiple sources of information from different dimensions of the linguistic input, including information external to the linguistic system, such as visually conveyed social information and high-level information about a speaker's linguistic ability.

    “Converging evidence suggests that the initial moments of competition between lexical alternatives are constrained by multiple sources of information from different dimensions of the linguistic input (e.g., Dahan & Tanenhaus 2004; Kukona et al. 2011), including information external to the linguistic system, such as visually conveyed social information (Hay & Drager 2010; Staum Casasanto 200”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 78 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Altmann GTM Kamide Y Henderson J Ferreira F 2004 Now you see it, now you don’t: mediating the mapping between language and the visual world The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world 347 386 New York Psychology Press
  2. Kučera H Francis W 1967 Computational analysis of present day American English Providence, RI Brown University Press
  3. Magnuson JS Tanenhaus MK Aslin RN Dahan D 2003 The microstructure of spoken word recognition: Studies with artificial lexicons Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 202 227 12825637
  4. O’Connor CM McRae K Cree GS 2006 Conceptual hierarchies arise from the dynamics of learning and processing: Insights from a flat attractor network Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2577 Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum
  5. Tanenhaus MK Leiman J Seidenberg M 1979 Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18 427 440

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kukona, A., Fang, S.-Y., Aicher, K. A., Chen, H., & Magnuson, J. S.
Affiliations
Haskins Laboratories (US)
Corresponding author
Kukona, Anuenue
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
119
Issue
1
Pages
23-42
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983622171
Cited by
139
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC005765, DC0055765)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-01994, F31HD060414, R01HD040353, HD-40353, HD060414, P01HD001994)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
eye movements, passive sentences, syntactic cues, time course
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Cognition, Eye Movements, Humans, Language, Reaction Time, Eye Movement Measurements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review