The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The time course of anticipatory constraint integration
Open accessAbstract
Several studies have demonstrated that as listeners hear sentences describing events in a scene, their eye movements anticipate upcoming linguistic items predicted by the unfolding relationship between scene and sentence. While this may reflect active prediction based on structural or contextual expectations, the influence of local thematic priming between words has not been fully examined. In Experiment 1, we presented verbs (e.g., arrest) in active (Subject-Verb-Object) sentences with displays containing verb-related patients (e.g., crook) and agents (e.g., policeman). We examined patient and agent fixations following the verb, after the agent role had been filled by another entity, but prior to bottom-up specification of the object. Participants were nearly as likely to fixate agents "anticipatorily" as patients, even though the agent role was already filled. However, the patient advantage suggested simultaneous influences of both local priming and active prediction. In Experiment 2, using passive sentences (Object-Verb-Subject), we found stronger, but still graded influences of role prediction when more time elapsed between verb and target, and more syntactic cues were available. We interpret anticipatory fixations as emerging from constraint-based processes that involve both non-predictive thematic priming and active prediction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Converging evidence suggests that the initial moments of competition between lexical alternatives are constrained by multiple sources of information from different dimensions of the linguistic input (e.g., Dahan & Tanenhaus 2004; Kukona et al. 2011), including information external to the linguistic system, such as visually conveyed social information (Hay & Drager 2010; Staum Casasanto 200”
From Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science (2013) · cites this paper as Kukona et al. 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elman, J. L. (1990) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1402_1 · Cited by 11,212 · cited 2×
“(2003) suggest one more alternative: simple recurrent networks (SRNs; Elman, 1990).”
BackgroundRational choice and the structure of the environment.
Simon, H. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0042769 · Cited by 5,919 · cited 2×
“One possible alternative to Kuperberg’s dual stream framework comes from ‘‘satisficing’’ (good enough, nonmaximizing; Simon, 1956) parsing theories; the ‘‘good enough representations’’ of Ferreira and colleagues (e.”
BackgroundThe TRACE model of speech perception
McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0 · Cited by 3,044 · cited 1×
“However , a model like TRACE ( McClelland & Elman , 1986 ) predicts such effects without explicit tracking of word onsets or offsets , or any explicit representation of a discrete set of possible completions .”
MethodIntegration of Visual and Linguistic Information in Spoken Language Comprehension
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7777863 · Cited by 2,929
Expectation-based syntactic comprehension
Lévy, R. (2007) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006 · Cited by 2,345 · cited 4×
“But if this were so, why should it be a general property of self-organizing systems that they activate or prime representation or structure that is incompatible with predictions afforded by, for example, a word onset (in the case of rhyme activation), a role clearly having been filled (as in priming in the current stu…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.676 · Cited by 2,259 · cited 2×
“…information impacts a listener's interpretation is a point of serious contention among theories of sentence processing (e.g., Frazier & Fodor, 1978; MacDonald, Pearlmutter, & Seidenberg, 1994), and has been the focus of considerable research in psycholinguistics (e.g., Duffy, Morris, & Rayner,…”
BackgroundBrandimonte, M. A., Bruno, N., & Collina, S. (1999) · Chess and Individual Differences · doi:10.1176/ajp.156.6.815 · Cited by 2,103
Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects
Swinney, D. (1979) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(79)90355-4 · Cited by 1,631 · cited 5×
“, Shillcock & Bard , 1993 ; Swinney , 1979 ) , we increased both in Experiment 2 .”
BackgroundResultInfluentialIncremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference.
Altmann, G., & Kamide, Y. (1999) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00059-1 · Cited by 1,615 · cited 15×
“These results from the ERP literature add further credence to the possibility that in situations like those used by Altmann and Kamide (1999), ''anticipation'' of cake given The boy will eat. . . could be driven at least in part by local priming of thematic (or event or situation) knowledge at the…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAllopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J., & Tanenhaus, M. (1998) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2558 · Cited by 1,600 · cited 3×
“This would be analogous to fixations to rhymes in spoken word recognition studies (e.g., looking at speaker given the unambiguous input beaker; Allopenna et al., 1998).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationProcessing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech
Marslen‐Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(78)90018-x · Cited by 1,464
The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model
Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(78)90002-1 · Cited by 1,348 · cited 1×
“…of when contextual information impacts a listener's interpretation is a point of serious contention among theories of sentence processing (e.g., Frazier & Fodor, 1978; MacDonald, Pearlmutter, & Seidenberg, 1994), and has been the focus of considerable research in psycholinguistics (e.g.,…”
BackgroundDeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Marta Kutas, A. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1504 · Cited by 1,236 · cited 2×
“…(an ERP component that is sensitive to how surprising a word is) upon encountering a determiner that does not fit with an expected upcoming noun (DeLong et al., 2005; see also Wicha, Moreno, & Kutas, 2004, and for related results in Dutch, see Van Berkum, Brown, Zwitserlood, Kooijman, &…”
BackgroundDistributed memory and the representation of general and specific information.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. (1985) · Journal of experimental psychology. General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.114.2.159 · Cited by 1,160 · cited 1×
“( 1997 ) also suggest that the distributed memory model of McClelland and Rumelhart ( 1985 ) might provide a good framework for priming based on thematic fit .”
BackgroundThe independence of syntactic processing
Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C. (1986) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(86)90006-9 · Cited by 1,151 · cited 1×
“…Fodor, 1978; MacDonald, Pearlmutter, & Seidenberg, 1994), and has been the focus of considerable research in psycholinguistics (e.g., Duffy, Morris, & Rayner, 1988; Ferreira & Clifton, 1986; Swinney, 1979; Tanenhaus, Leiman, & Seidenberg, 1979; Tanenhaus, Spivey-Knowlton, Eberhard, & Sedivy, 1995).”
A probabilistic earley parser as a psycholinguistic model
Hale, J. (2001) · Second meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Language technologies 2001 - NAACL '01 · doi:10.3115/1073336.1073357 · Cited by 1,150 · cited 3×
“Such views would not predict activation of representations that are compatible with already-filled roles.”
BackgroundDistributed memory and the representation of general and specific information.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1985) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.114.2.159 · Cited by 1,129
Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax
Kuperberg, G. R. (2006) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.063 · Cited by 1,087 · cited 5×
“One possibly fruitful question for future research is whether the SOPARSE architecture might provide a unifying framework encompassing both hypothesized streams (Kuperberg, 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialKamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/s0749-596x(03)00023-8 · Cited by 1,010 · cited 2×
“While Kamide, Altmann, et al. (2003) discuss the possibility that anticipatory fixations could result from a system that does not actively predict upcoming referents, they argue that their results are most consistent with ''an incremental processor that establishes the fullest possible…”
BackgroundResultAnticipating Upcoming Words in Discourse: Evidence From ERPs and Reading Times.
Berkum, J. J. A. V., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Peter Hagoort, A. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443 · Cited by 932
Cooper, R. (1974) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(74)90005-x · Cited by 836 · cited 1×
“Listeners' eye movements are monitored as they view (and often interact with) a visual scene and listen to speech (for a related precursor, see Cooper, 1974).”
BackgroundModeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension
McRae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2543 · Cited by 763
Spivey, M. J. (2008) · doi:10.5860/choice.45-4685 · Cited by 737 · cited 1×
“Spivey ( 2007 ) visualizes the state of a recurrent network over time as points in a many dimen - sional space ( e . g .”
BackgroundLexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading
Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1988) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(88)90066-6 · Cited by 631
Cree, G. S., & McRae, K. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.163 · Cited by 621 · cited 1×
“, Cree & McRae , 2003 ; Cree , McRae , & McNorgan , 1999 ; O ' Connor , McRae , & Cree , 2006 ) , or a re - lated attractor framework tailored to sequential processing of spoken input ( Plaut & Kello , 1999 ) .”
BackgroundMirman, D., Dixon, J., & Magnuson, J. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.006 · Cited by 517
Self-citationWicha, N., Moreno, E., & Kutas, M. (2004) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/0898929041920487 · Cited by 512
Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences
Kuperberg, G. R., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D. N., & Holcomb, P. J. (2003) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00086-7 · Cited by 489
An alternative view of the mental lexicon
Elman, J. L. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.003 · Cited by 480 · cited 2×
“' ' acknowl - edge ' ' senses of ' ' admit ' ' ) indicated by a sentence context in turn affects parsing preferences ( Hare , McRae , & Elman , 2003 , 2004 ) , and verb aspect ( ' ' was skating ' ' vs .”
BackgroundOn the Meaning of Words and Dinosaur Bones: Lexical Knowledge Without a Lexicon
Elman, J. L. (2009) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01023.x · Cited by 458 · cited 1×
“…, thematic and other aspects of linguistic knowledge would constitute features at varying time scales , that would be simultaneously embedded statisti - cally within the patterns of connectivity within the net - work without explicit levels of representation ( see also Elman , 2004 , 2009 ) .”
BackgroundHuettig, F., & Altmann, G. (2005) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.003 · Cited by 445 · cited 6×
“The impact of lexical priming is observable even as a word is unfolding ( Huettig & Altmann , 2005 ; Yee & Sedivy , 2006 ) .”
BackgroundInfluentialIntegrating Verbs, Situation Schemas, and Thematic Role Concepts
Ferretti, T. R., McRae, K., & Hatherell, A. (2001) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2728 · Cited by 444 · cited 4×
“While their studies have revealed that accessing a word triggers activation of rich thematic and event knowledge (Ferretti et al., 2001; McRae et al., 2005), they have also shown that there is a subtle and complex interplay between such priming, and mechanisms of ongoing sentence processing that they explain via const…”
BackgroundInfluentialAltmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (2007) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.12.004 · Cited by 434 · cited 16×
“…to afford robust prediction of upcoming syntactic constituents and even specific words (for related results, see Pearlmutter & MacDonald, 1995), and have motivated theories that posit active forecasting mechanisms in sentence processing (e.g., Altmann & Kamide, 2007; Knoeferle & Crocker, 2007).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialMacWhinney, B. (1999) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410602367 · Cited by 426
Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
Hoeks, J., Stowe, L., & Doedens, G. (2004) · Brain research. Cognitive brain research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.022 · Cited by 400 · cited 3×
“For example, Kim and Osterhout (2005) pitted syntactic cues against semantic cues to thematic role in sentences like The meal was devouring. . .: while syntactic features of meal suggest that the verb is semantically anomalous (e.g., cooking would be more appropriate), semantic cues suggest the verb should be in past…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialIncrementality and Prediction in Human Sentence Processing
Altmann, G. T. M., & Mirković, J. (2009) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01022.x · Cited by 392 · cited 4×
“, Altmann & Mirkovic , 2009 ) .”
BackgroundResultInfluentialProbabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution
MacDonald, M. C. (1994) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690969408402115 · Cited by 379
Kamide, Y., Scheepers, C., & Altmann, G. (2003) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1023/a:1021933015362 · Cited by 344 · cited 1×
“Kamide, Scheepers, and Altmann (2003) used a visual world design which included such items: their displays depicted sets like a hare, fox, cabbage, and tree, and their sentences described one of the items (e.g., hare) in differing thematic roles in an active (e.g., The hare will eat the cabbage)…”
MethodLearning and applying contextual constraints in sentence comprehension
St. John, M. F., & McClelland, J. L. (1990) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(90)90008-n · Cited by 322 · cited 1×
“John & McClelland , 1990 ) , since both have been construed as models of role filling ( though neither framework is lim - ited to such scope ) , and both have logically assumed for - ward directionality .”
BackgroundActions and Affordances in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution.
Chambers, C. G., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Magnuson, J. S. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.687 · Cited by 321 · cited 1×
“, put, as in Chambers et al., 2004, or return, as in Chambers & San Juan, 2008). Let us emphasize again that we are not excluding a role for prediction based upon context-specific evaluation of verb and object properties. As Chambers et al. put it, highly specific and possibly never experienced non-linguistic scene an…”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials
Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.10.002 · Cited by 319 · cited 3×
“…system may require two loosely interacting streams ( lexical - semantic and morphosyntactic – thematic ) as suggested by Kuperberg ( 2007 ; see also Kim & Osterhout , 2005 ) , or it may be possible for both local priming and forward - directed prediction to emerge within a single self -…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThematic Roles as Verb-specific Concepts
McRae, K., & Ferretti, T. R. (1997) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/016909697386835 · Cited by 303 · cited 3×
“Some of our items were based on materials from McRae et al. (1997, 1998) and Binder, Duffy, and Rayner (2001). Each verb was grouped with seven animate nouns: some nouns were good agent or patient candidates, some were poor candidates, and some were included to fall in the middle of the typicality scale.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input
Lévy, R., Bicknell, K., Slattery, T. J., & Rayner, K. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0907664106 · Cited by 299
Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition.
Yee, E., & Sedivy, J. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.1 · Cited by 284 · cited 8×
“The impact of lexical priming is observable even as a word is unfolding ( Huettig & Altmann , 2005 ; Yee & Sedivy , 2006 ) .”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Coordinated Interplay of Scene, Utterance, and World Knowledge: Evidence From Eye Tracking
Knoeferle, P., & Crocker, M. W. (2006) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_65 · Cited by 279 · cited 6×
“Our findings are complementary to those of Knoeferle and Crocker ( 2006 , 2007 ) .”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSentence comprehension: A parallel distributed processing approach
McClelland, J. L., John, M. S., & Taraban, R. (1989) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690968908406371 · Cited by 271
The Dynamics of Lexical Competition During Spoken Word Recognition
Magnuson, J., Dixon, J., Tanenhaus, M., & Aslin, R. (2007) · Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1080/03640210709336987 · Cited by 253
Self-citationA basis for generating expectancies for verbs from nouns
McRae, K., Hare, M. L., Elman, J. L., & Ferretti, T. R. (2005) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03193221 · Cited by 248 · cited 2×
“While their studies have revealed that accessing a word triggers activation of rich thematic and event knowledge (Ferretti et al., 2001; McRae et al., 2005), they have also shown that there is a subtle and complex interplay between such priming, and mechanisms of ongoing sentence processing that they explain via const…”
BackgroundEffects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing
Tabor, W., Galantucci, B., & Richardson, D. C. (2004) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.01.001 · Cited by 243 · cited 10×
“In SOPARSE , local information can compete quite powerfully with global ( longer time scale ) information related via a set of linked treelets activated by the input thus far .”
BackgroundInfluentialThe time course of spoken word learning and recognition: studies with artificial lexicons.
Magnuson, J., Tanenhaus, M., Aslin, R., & Dahan, D. (2003) · Journal of experimental psychology. General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.202 · Cited by 231
Self-citationDahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M. (2005) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03193787 · Cited by 230 · cited 2×
“…, with the words that we have heard , whether based on the - matic role compatibility ( Altmann & Kamide , 1999 ) , visual features of objects ( Dahan & Tanenhaus , 2005 ) , depicted or implied event information ( Altmann & Kamide , 2007 ; Knoeferle & Crocker , 2006 , 2007 ) , category (…”
BackgroundAn Attractor Model of Lexical Conceptual Processing: Simulating Semantic Priming
Cree, G. S., McRae, K., & McNorgan, C. (1999) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2303_4 · Cited by 221
Dahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.498 · Cited by 214 · cited 1×
“In general , for effects to be detect - able immediately , constraints must be overwhelmingly strong , whether they are based on lexical priming , or linguis - tic ( Dahan & Tanenhaus , 2004 ) , scene ( Altmann & Kamide , 1999 ) , or pragmatic ( Magnuson et al .”
BackgroundAltmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (2009) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.005 · Cited by 214 · cited 1×
“In - stead , consistent with Altmann and Kamide ( 2007 , 2009 ) , lexical , syntactic , thematic and other aspects of linguistic knowledge would constitute features at varying time scales , that would be simultaneously embedded statisti - cally within the patterns of connectivity within the net -…”
BackgroundPlaying on the typewriter, typing on the piano: manipulation knowledge of objects
Myung, J.-Y., Blumstein, S. E., & Sedivy, J. (2005) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.010 · Cited by 198 · cited 3×
“At the other end of the continuum, we have fixations to items in a display that are semantically related to a named target, but that have no other connection to the unfolding language or the task at hand (Dahan & Tanenhaus, 2005; Huettig & Altmann, 2005; Myung et al., 2006; Yee & Sedivy, 2006).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialIndividual Differences and Probabilistic Constraints in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution
Pearlmutter, N., & MacDonald, M. (1995) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1024 · Cited by 198 · cited 3×
“At first glance, our results may appear consistent with the classical view of context integration proposed by Swinney (1979) and Tanenhaus et al.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialVerb aspect and the activation of event knowledge.
Ferretti, T. R., Kutas, M., & McRae, K. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.182 · Cited by 193 · cited 3×
“, 2005; Ferretti et al., 2001; Knoeferle & Crocker, 2006, 2007) provide strong evidence for anticipation based on forecasting. However, such results do not rule out the possibility of important contributions of local thematic priming in addition (cf. Kuperberg, 2007). The complexity required of a forecasting mechanism…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialCognitive models of speech processing : the Second Sperlonga Meeting
Altmann, G., & Shillcock, R. (1993) · doi:10.4324/9780203775745 · Cited by 170 · cited 2×
“However , the original interpretation of these results no longer holds ; Shillcock and Bard ( 1993 ) demonstrated that immediate context - selective priming is obtained when constraints are sub - stantially stronger than those used in the 1979 studies ( see also Magnuson et al .”
BackgroundResultSense and structure: Meaning as a determinant of verb subcategorization preferences
Hare, M. L., McRae, K., & Elman, J. L. (2003) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/s0749-596x(02)00516-8 · Cited by 169
Evidence for Self-Organized Sentence Processing: Digging-In Effects.
Tabor, W., & Hutchins, S. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.431 · Cited by 147 · cited 8×
“In SOPARSE , local information can compete quite powerfully with global ( longer time scale ) information related via a set of linked treelets activated by the input thus far .”
BackgroundInfluentialThe influence of recent scene events on spoken comprehension: Evidence from eye movements
Knoeferle, P., & Crocker, M. W. (2007) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.01.003 · Cited by 147 · cited 7×
“…to afford robust prediction of upcoming syntactic constituents and even specific words (for related results, see Pearlmutter & MacDonald, 1995), and have motivated theories that posit active forecasting mechanisms in sentence processing (e.g., Altmann & Kamide, 2007; Knoeferle & Crocker, 2007).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe Effects of Thematic Fit and Discourse Context on Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution
Binder, K. S., Duffy, S. A., & Rayner, K. (2001) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2754 · Cited by 88 · cited 1×
“( 1997 , 1998 ) and Binder , Duffy , and Rayner ( 2001 ) .”
Admitting that admitting verb sense into corpus analyses makes sense
Hare, M. L., McRae, K., & Elman, J. L. (2004) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960344000152 · Cited by 80
The Morton-Massaro law of information integration: Implications for models of perception.
Movellan, J. R., & McClelland, J. L. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.113 · Cited by 71 · cited 2×
“Here , we appeal to the distinction between exploitation ( maximization ) vs . exploration ( Movellan & McClelland , 2001 ) .”
BackgroundResultThe Repetition-Break Plot Structure: A Cognitive Influence on Selection in the Marketplace of Ideas
Loewenstein, J., & Heath, C. (2009) · Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2008.01001.x · Cited by 65
Chambers, C. G., & Juan, V. S. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.009 · Cited by 55 · cited 2×
“Chambers and San Juan (2008) have also demonstrated that anticipatory eye movements are driven by dynamic, ''situation-specific'' knowledge concerning the relationship between scene and sentence.”
BackgroundImmediate effects of form-class constraints on spoken word recognition
Magnuson, J., Tanenhaus, M., & Aslin, R. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.005 · Cited by 42 · cited 1×
“In general, for effects to be detectable immediately, constraints must be overwhelmingly strong, whether they are based on lexical priming, or linguistic (Dahan & Tanenhaus, 2004), scene (Altmann & Kamide, 1999), or pragmatic (Magnuson et al., 2008) context.”
BackgroundSelf-citationMapping across Domains Without Feedback: A Neural Network Model of Transfer of Implicit Knowledge
Dienes, Z. (1999) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/s0364-0213(99)80052-4 · Cited by 4
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Ferreira, 2002, Good-enough representations in language comprehension, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11, 10.1111/1467-8721.00158 · DOI
- Magnuson, 2000, Simple recurrent networks and competition effects in spoken word recognition, University of Rochester Working Papers in the Language Sciences, 1, 56
- Marslen-Wilson, 1978, Processing interactions during word recognition in continuous speech, Cognition, 10, 29
- Tanenhaus, 1979, Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 427, 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90237-8 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science
Clark, A. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000477 · Cited by 5,924
Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review.
Pickering, M. J., & Gambi, C. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000158 · Cited by 581
Four central questions about prediction in language processing
Huettig, F. (2015) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.014 · Cited by 405
Arielle Borovsky, A., Elman, J. L., & Fernald, A. E. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.01.005 · Cited by 323
Huettig, F., & Janse, E. (2015) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1047459 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Kukona, A., Fang, S.-Y., Aicher, K. A., Chen, H., & Magnuson, J. S.
- Affiliations
- Haskins Laboratories (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kukona, Anuenue
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-42
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3047461
- OpenAlex
- W1983622171
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC005765, DC0055765)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-01994, F31HD060414, R01HD040353, HD-40353, HD060414, P01HD001994)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- eye movements, passive sentences, syntactic cues, time course
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Cognition, Eye Movements, Humans, Language, Reaction Time, Eye Movement Measurements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review