The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The time course of anticipatory constraint integration
Open accessAbstract
Several studies have demonstrated that as listeners hear sentences describing events in a scene, their eye movements anticipate upcoming linguistic items predicted by the unfolding relationship between scene and sentence. While this may reflect active prediction based on structural or contextual expectations, the influence of local thematic priming between words has not been fully examined. In Experiment 1, we presented verbs (e.g., arrest) in active (Subject-Verb-Object) sentences with displays containing verb-related patients (e.g., crook) and agents (e.g., policeman). We examined patient and agent fixations following the verb, after the agent role had been filled by another entity, but prior to bottom-up specification of the object. Participants were nearly as likely to fixate agents "anticipatorily" as patients, even though the agent role was already filled. However, the patient advantage suggested simultaneous influences of both local priming and active prediction. In Experiment 2, using passive sentences (Object-Verb-Subject), we found stronger, but still graded influences of role prediction when more time elapsed between verb and target, and more syntactic cues were available. We interpret anticipatory fixations as emerging from constraint-based processes that involve both non-predictive thematic priming and active prediction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Converging evidence suggests that the initial moments of competition between lexical alternatives are constrained by multiple sources of information from different dimensions of the linguistic input (e.g., Dahan & Tanenhaus 2004; Kukona et al. 2011), including information external to the linguistic system, such as visually conveyed social information (Hay & Drager 2010; Staum Casasanto 200”
From Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science (2013) · cites this paper as Kukona et al. 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elman, J. L. (1990) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1402_1 · Cited by 11,212 · cited 2×
“(2003) suggest one more alternative: simple recurrent networks (SRNs; Elman, 1990).”
BackgroundRational choice and the structure of the environment.
Simon, H. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0042769 · Cited by 5,919 · cited 2×
“One possible alternative to Kuperberg’s dual stream framework comes from ‘‘satisficing’’ (good enough, nonmaximizing; Simon, 1956) parsing theories; the ‘‘good enough representations’’ of Ferreira and colleagues (e.”
BackgroundThe TRACE model of speech perception
McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0 · Cited by 3,044 · cited 1×
“However , a model like TRACE ( McClelland & Elman , 1986 ) predicts such effects without explicit tracking of word onsets or offsets , or any explicit representation of a discrete set of possible completions .”
MethodIntegration of Visual and Linguistic Information in Spoken Language Comprehension
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7777863 · Cited by 2,929
Expectation-based syntactic comprehension
Lévy, R. (2007) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006 · Cited by 2,345 · cited 4×
“But if this were so, why should it be a general property of self-organizing systems that they activate or prime representation or structure that is incompatible with predictions afforded by, for example, a word onset (in the case of rhyme activation), a role clearly having been filled (as in priming in the current stu…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.676 · Cited by 2,259 · cited 2×
“…information impacts a listener's interpretation is a point of serious contention among theories of sentence processing (e.g., Frazier & Fodor, 1978; MacDonald, Pearlmutter, & Seidenberg, 1994), and has been the focus of considerable research in psycholinguistics (e.g., Duffy, Morris, & Rayner,…”
BackgroundBrandimonte, M. A., Bruno, N., & Collina, S. (1999) · Chess and Individual Differences · doi:10.1176/ajp.156.6.815 · Cited by 2,103
Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects
Swinney, D. (1979) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(79)90355-4 · Cited by 1,631 · cited 5×
“, Shillcock & Bard , 1993 ; Swinney , 1979 ) , we increased both in Experiment 2 .”
BackgroundResultInfluentialIncremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference.
Altmann, G., & Kamide, Y. (1999) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00059-1 · Cited by 1,615 · cited 15×
“These results from the ERP literature add further credence to the possibility that in situations like those used by Altmann and Kamide (1999), ''anticipation'' of cake given The boy will eat. . . could be driven at least in part by local priming of thematic (or event or situation) knowledge at the…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAllopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J., & Tanenhaus, M. (1998) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2558 · Cited by 1,600 · cited 3×
“This would be analogous to fixations to rhymes in spoken word recognition studies (e.g., looking at speaker given the unambiguous input beaker; Allopenna et al., 1998).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
10 of the 78 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Ferreira, 2002, Good-enough representations in language comprehension, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11, 10.1111/1467-8721.00158 · DOI
- Magnuson, 2000, Simple recurrent networks and competition effects in spoken word recognition, University of Rochester Working Papers in the Language Sciences, 1, 56
- Marslen-Wilson, 1978, Processing interactions during word recognition in continuous speech, Cognition, 10, 29
- Tanenhaus, 1979, Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 427, 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90237-8 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science
Clark, A. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000477 · Cited by 5,924
Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review.
Pickering, M. J., & Gambi, C. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000158 · Cited by 581
Four central questions about prediction in language processing
Huettig, F. (2015) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.014 · Cited by 405
Arielle Borovsky, A., Elman, J. L., & Fernald, A. E. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.01.005 · Cited by 323
Huettig, F., & Janse, E. (2015) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1047459 · Cited by 277
Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems.
Mirman, D., Landrigan, J.-F., & Britt, A. E. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000092 · Cited by 265
Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension
Metusalem, R., Marta Kutas, A., Urbach, T. P., Hare, M. L., McRae, K., & Elman, J. L. (2012) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.001 · Cited by 179
Good-enough linguistic representations and online cognitive equilibrium in language processing
Karimi, H., & Ferreira, F. (2016) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1053951 · Cited by 159
Communicative efficiency in language production: Optional case-marking in Japanese
Kurumada, C., & Jaeger, T. F. (2015) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.03.003 · Cited by 145
A cognitive load delays predictive eye movements similarly during L1 and L2 comprehension
Ito, A., Corley, M. M. B., & Pickering, M. J. (2017) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728917000050 · Cited by 141
“To explore how predictions are affected by factors that can reduce available cognitive resources, we used the visual world eye-tracking paradigm to compare predictions between people who performed a concurrent working memory task and those who did not.”
MethodKalénine, S., Mirman, D., Middleton, E., & Buxbaum, L. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0027626 · Cited by 91
“Even more closely related to the procedure used in the present study, Kukona et al. (2011) nicely demonstrated that during sentence comprehension (e.g., “Toby arrests the . . . .”), fixations following verb presentation increase overall for semantically related objects (e.g., crook, policeman)…”
Learning to predict or predicting to learn?
Rabagliati, H., Gambi, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2015) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1077979 · Cited by 99
Huettig, F., & Guerra, E. (2018) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2018.11.013 · Cited by 96
Where are the cookies? Two- and three-year-olds use number-marked verbs to anticipate upcoming nouns
Lukyanenko, C., & Fisher, C. L. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.012 · Cited by 101
“The reports that yielded evidence for pre-activation based on a function word included longer intervals for measurement between the function word and the onset of the target noun than those that yielded negative results (see also Kukona et al., 2011).”
A “bag-of-arguments” mechanism for initial verb predictions
Chow, W.-Y., Smith, C. M., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2015) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1066832 · Cited by 111
Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?
Rissman, L., & Majid, A. (2019) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01634-5 · Cited by 133
Lee, C., Middleton, E. L., Mirman, D., Kalénine, S., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0027533 · Cited by 73
A parallel architecture perspective on pre-activation and prediction in language processing
Huettig, F., Audring, J., & Jackendoff, R. S. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105050 · Cited by 94
Wait a second! delayed impact of argument roles on on-line verb prediction
Chow, W.-Y., Lau, E. F., Wang, S., & Phillips, C. (2018) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2018.1427878 · Cited by 62
“The present study extends previous eye-tracking findings by Kukona et al. (2011), who found that listeners’ anticipatory eye-movements were sensitive to filled vs.”
ResultPredictors of verb-mediated anticipatory eye movements in the visual world.
Hintz, F., Meyer, A. S., & Huettig, F. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000388 · Cited by 63
“Functional Versus General Word Associations Our findings of a robust role of functional associations for language-mediated anticipatory eye gaze are compatible with the findings of Kukona et al. (2011).”
ResultPrediction, explanation, and the role of generative models in language processing.
Farmer, T. A., Brown, M., & Tanenhaus, M. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12002312 · Cited by 57
“Converging evidence suggests that the initial moments of competition between lexical alternatives are constrained by multiple sources of information from different dimensions of the linguistic input (e.g., Dahan & Tanenhaus 2004; Kukona et al. 2011), including information external to the linguistic system, such as vis…”
BackgroundFixations in the visual world paradigm: where, when, why?
Magnuson, J. S. (2019) · Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science · doi:10.1007/s41809-019-00035-3 · Cited by 63
Self-citationChildren and adults integrate talker and verb information in online processing.
Borovsky, A., & Creel, S. C. (2014) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035591 · Cited by 53
The interaction of visual and linguistic saliency during syntactic ambiguity resolution
Coco, M. I., & Keller, F. (2015) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.936475 · Cited by 50
“The results are also compatible with more recent situated understanding constraint-satisfaction accounts, which postulate locality, and temporal dependence of constraint activation (e.g., Knoeferle & Crocker, 2006; Kukona et al., 2011).”
BackgroundResultAction relevance in linguistic context drives word-induced motor activity
Aravena, P., Courson, M., Frak, V., Cheylus, A., Paulignan, Y., Déprez, V., & Nazir, T. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00163 · Cited by 65
“The whole event evoked when processing a sentence within a given context restricts the set of potential word referents (Kako and Trueswell, 2000; Kamide et al., 2003; Chambers and Juan, 2008; Bicknell et al., 2010; Kukona et al., 2011).”
BackgroundHuang, Y., & Snedeker, J. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.31234/osf.io/huve3 · Cited by 9
Borovsky, A., Burns, E. L., Elman, J., & Evans, J. (2013) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2013.09.001 · Cited by 47
“One interpretation of these additional Action-Related fixations by unimpaired individuals is that they are continuing to activate items that may be locally consistent but globally implausible with the sentence-level message (Borovsky et al., 2012; Kukona et al., 2011; Tabor, Galantucci, & Richardson, 2004).”
BackgroundKukona, A., Braze, D., Johns, C. L., Mencl, W. E., Dyke, J. A. V., Magnuson, J. S., Pugh, K. R., Shankweiler, D., & Tabor, W. (2016) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.09.009 · Cited by 52
“2 The current analyses differed from Kukona et al. (2014) in two critical respects.”
InfluentialSelf-citationBeyond associations: Sensitivity to structure in pre-schoolers’ linguistic predictions
Gambi, C., Pickering, M. J., & Rabagliati, H. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.003 · Cited by 43
“Because structural computations will mostly be completed after 670 semantics, though, there will be situations in which predictions will only be compatible with 671 the unfolding semantic interpretation but not with the structure of the sentence (such as in 672 Kukona et al., 2011, Experiment 1).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialPrediction as memory retrieval: timing and mechanisms
Chow, W.-Y., Momma, S., Smith, C. M., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2016) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2016.1160135 · Cited by 36
“This is helped by the existence of related findings from other experimental measures (eye-tracking: Kukona et al., 2011; speeded cloze: Chow et al., 2015).”
MethodThe psychologist said quickly, “Dialogue descriptions modulate reading speed!”
Stites, M. C., Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2012) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0248-7 · Cited by 35
Kukona, A., & Tabor, W. (2011) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01180.x · Cited by 35
Self-citationPrediction of phonological and gender information: An event-related potential study in Italian
Ito, A., Gambi, C., Pickering, M. J., Fuellenbach, K., & Husband, E. M. (2019) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107291 · Cited by 78
Sauppe, S. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00095 · Cited by 38
“As mentioned in the introduction, when anticipating sentence-final syntactic objects, listeners could specifically predict the patient referent based on its role in the event described by the verb (cf. Kukona et al., 2012).”
BackgroundAnticipation in Real-World Scenes: The Role of Visual Context and Visual Memory
Coco, M. I., Keller, F., & Malcolm, G. (2016) · Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1111/cogs.12313 · Cited by 33
Nozari, N., Trueswell, J., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1068-8 · Cited by 33
L2 Prediction during complex sentence processing
Chun, E., & Kaan, E. (2019) · Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science · doi:10.1007/s41809-019-00038-0 · Cited by 41
Integrating mechanisms of visual guidance in naturalistic language production
Coco, M. I., & Keller, F. (2014) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-014-0642-0 · Cited by 25
“, scene understanding has to happen before constraints supplied by visual attention are applied to sentence production (Altmann and Kamide 1999; Knoeferle and Crocker 2007; Kukona et al. 2011).”
“Proactive” in many ways: Developmental evidence for a dynamic pluralistic approach to prediction
Mani, N., Daum, M. M., & Huettig, F. (2015) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1111395 · Cited by 37
Prediction involves two stages: Evidence from visual-world eye-tracking
Corps, R. E., Brooke, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2021) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2021.104298 · Cited by 26
Gambi, C., Jindal, P., Sharpe, S., Pickering, M. J., & Rabagliati, H. (2020) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13465 · Cited by 31
Close, but no garlic: Perceptuomotor and event knowledge activation during language comprehension
Amsel, B. D., DeLong, K. A., & Marta Kutas, A. (2015) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.03.009 · Cited by 34
Mishra, R. K., Olivers, C. N. L., & Huettig, F. (2013) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-62604-2.00008-3 · Cited by 24
Metusalem, R., Marta Kutas, A., Urbach, T. P., & Elman, J. L. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.004 · Cited by 26
“, 2011), anticipatory looking behavior in the Visual World Paradigm (Borovsky et al., 2012; Kamide et al., 2003; Kukona et al., 2011) and eventrelated brain potentials (ERPs; Bicknell et al.”
BackgroundWong, R., Reichle, E. D., & Veldre, A. (2024) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-024-02588-z · Cited by 31
“This finding of anticipatory eye movements based on contextual information has since been replicated in a number of visual world studies (Kamide et al., 2003; Kukona et al., 2011; see Huettig et al., 2011, for a review).”
Automaticity and prediction in non-native language comprehension
Ito, A., & Pickering, M. J. (2021) · Bilingual processing and acquisition · doi:10.1075/bpa.12.02ito · Cited by 30
Ito, A., & Sakai, H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.607474 · Cited by 31
Müller, J., Wendt, D., Kollmeier, B., & Brand, T. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164627 · Cited by 22
“Other studies, which analyzed their data with GCA used lower order polynomials, due to less complex data [37, 38, 39].”
ResultDecroix, J., & Kalénine, S. (2019) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01784-7 · Cited by 26
Interpreting prosodic cues in discourse context
Brown, M., Salverda, A. P., Gunlogson, C. A., & Tanenhaus, M. (2013) · Language, Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/01690965.2013.862285 · Cited by 21
Milburn, E. A., Warren, T. C., & Dickey, M. W. (2015) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1117117 · Cited by 24
The role of language production in making predictions during comprehension
Lelonkiewicz, J. R., Rabagliati, H., & Pickering, M. J. (2021) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218211028438 · Cited by 22
“More importantly, there is evidence that prediction can be achieved without the contribution of forward models (i.e., comprehenders might predict based on the activation of event schemes; Amsel et al., 2015; Kukona et al., 2011; Metusalem et al., 2012).”
BackgroundIto, A. (2024) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2024.104553 · Cited by 23
Predicting (variability of) context effects in language comprehension
Knoeferle, P. (2019) · Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science · doi:10.1007/s41809-019-00025-5 · Cited by 23
Dresang, H. C., Dickey, M. W., & Warren, T. C. (2019) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643294.2019.1656604 · Cited by 18
“Semantic memory for events is automatically activated when neurotypical adults hear or read isolated words (Matsuki et al., 2011; Kukona et al., 2011); Verbs prime (activate) typical agents, themes, and instruments associated with the events those verbs denote, and vice-versa (Hare, Jones, Thomson, Kelly & McRae, 2009…”
BackgroundThe interaction of grammatically distinct agreement dependencies in predictive processing
Stone, K., Veríssimo, J., Schad, D. J., Oltrogge, E., Vasishth, S., & Lago, S. (2021) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2021.1921816 · Cited by 19
“One such case concerns the interaction between visual and sentence-level information (Knoeferle & Crocker, 2006, 2007; Kukona et al., 2011, 2014; Rommers et al., 2013, 2015).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialIto, A. (2019) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021819851394 · Cited by 19
Peters, R. E., Grüter, T., & Borovsky, A. (2018) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716418000383 · Cited by 23
“Looks to such locally coherent items are seen in native language processing regardless of the fact that they should already have been disqualified as likely targets by the agent (Borovsky et al., 2012; Kukona et al., 2011).”
BackgroundLozano‐Argüelles, C., Sagarra, N., & Casillas, J. V. (2019) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728919000634 · Cited by 18
Verb-argument integration in primary progressive aphasia: Real-time argument access and selection
Mack, J. E., Mesulam, M. M., Rogalski, E. J., & Thompson, C. K. (2019) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107192 · Cited by 16
Milburn, E. A., Dickey, M. W., Warren, T. C., & Hayes, R. A. (2021) · Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1080/13825585.2021.1962791 · Cited by 18
“This provides additional confidence that older adults’ fixations to the verb-congruent competitor in Experiment 2 reflect their automatic activation of this referent based on the verb’s coarse-grained semantic constraints, as found in previous visual-world studies (Borovsky et al., 2012; Kamide et al., 2003; Kukona et…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialA theory of prediction in simultaneous interpreting
Amos, R. M., & Pickering, M. J. (2019) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728919000671 · Cited by 28
Karimi, H., Brothers, T. A., & Ferreira, F. (2019) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.04.001 · Cited by 16
Information entropy facilitates (not impedes) lexical processing during language comprehension
Karimi, H., Weber, P., & Zinn, J. (2024) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-024-02463-x · Cited by 10
“…emerge from a “dumb” system where the preceding context simply leads to spreading activation of features that then facilitate the processing of any upcoming input that shares those features (Huettig, 2015; Karimi et al., 2019; Kukona et al., 2011; also see Kahneman, 2011; Kuperberg, 2007).”
Spoken Word Recognition: A Focus on Plasticity
Kapnoula, E. C., Jevtović, M., & Magnuson, J. S. (2023) · Annual Review of Linguistics · doi:10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031422-113507 · Cited by 12
“…SWR and spoken language comprehension more broadly, including semantics (Altmann & Kamide 1999, Ferretti et al. 2001), local thematic information (Kukona et al. 2011), visual context (Chambers et al. 2004, Eberhard et al. 1995, Sedivy et al. 1999, Tanenhaus et al. 1995), and world knowledge…”
BackgroundSelf-citationPredictive Sentence Processing at Speed: Evidence from Online Mouse Cursor Tracking
Kukona, A. (2023) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13285 · Cited by 11
Self-citationDevelopmental Timescale of Rapid Adaptation to Conflicting Cues in Real‐Time Sentence Processing
Yazbec, A., Kaschak, M. P., & Borovsky, A. (2019) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12704 · Cited by 8
Prediction and Production of Simple Mathematical Equations: Evidence from Visual World Eye-Tracking
Hintz, F., & Meyer, A. S. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130766 · Cited by 10
Predictive language comprehension in Parkinson’s disease
Aveni, K., Ahmed, J., Borovsky, A., McRae, K., Jenkins, M. E., Sprengel, K. A., Fraser, J. A., Orange, J. B., Knowles, T., & Roberts, A. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0262504 · Cited by 11
Evidence for two stages of prediction in non-native speakers: A visual-world eye-tracking study
Corps, R. E., Liao, M., & Pickering, M. J. (2022) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728922000499 · Cited by 35
“Our experiment involved more items than previous experiments (e.g., 28 critical sentences vs. 16 in Altmann & Kamide, 1999) and we had at least a similar number of critical trials to previous studies (e.g., Kukona et al., 2011 had 640 trials; Altmann & Kamide, 1999 had 384; we had 672).”
ResultDoes signal reduction imply predictive coding in models of spoken word recognition?
Luthra, S., Li, M. Y. C., You, H., Brodbeck, C. J., & Magnuson, J. S. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-021-01924-x · Cited by 46
Self-citationVanek, N., Škorić, A. M., Košutar, S., Matějka, Š., & Stone, K. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-53353-0 · Cited by 9
“Following the logic that more structural cues within a sentence can lead to more robust anticipatory eye movements to targets 36,37 , within Croatian we expected increased and earlier fixations on the factual in negative concord, followed by sentential negation.”
BackgroundRhyme as resonance in poetry comprehension: An expert–novice study
Lea, R. B., Elfenbein, A., & Rapp, D. N. (2021) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-021-01167-0 · Cited by 7
Kamide, Y., & Kukona, A. (2018) · Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1111/cogs.12694 · Cited by 8
“Models by Hale (2001) and Levy (2008b) assume that comprehenders only distribute probabilities over grammatical parses that are compatible with the global syntactic constraints; thus, they do not predict the effects observed here.”
BackgroundSelf-citationNakamura, M., Momma, S., Sakai, H., & Phillips, C. (2024) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.70023 · Cited by 6
Troyer, M., & Borovsky, A. (2017) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12488 · Cited by 9
Hintz, F., Meyer, A. S., & Huettig, F. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107409 · Cited by 7
“Using visual world eye-tracking (Huettig et al., 2011, for review), Kukona et al. (2011) provided experimental evidence supporting the notion that associations and combinatorial event information jointly contribute to anticipatory processing during comprehension.”
ResultHow Animacy and Verbal Information Influence V2 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Eye Movements
de Swart, P., & van Bergen, G. (2019) · Open Linguistics · doi:10.1515/opli-2019-0035 · Cited by 9
“Indeed, Kukona et al. (2011), also using a Visual World paradigm, found evidence for this kind of thematic priming, in addition to prediction effects based on structural characteristics.”
MethodThe neural bases of argument structure processing revealed by primed lexical decision
Lee, D., Pruce, B., & Newman, S. D. (2014) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.04.013 · Cited by 5
Effect of repetition proportion on language-driven anticipatory eye movements
Britt, A. E., Mirman, D., Kornilov, S., & Magnuson, J. (2013) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.10.004 · Cited by 6
Self-citationVerb Vocabulary Supports Event Probability Use in Developmental Language Disorder
Kueser, J. B., Borovsky, A., Deevy, P., Muezzinoglu, M., Outzen, C., & Leonard, L. B. (2024) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2024_jslhr-23-00600 · Cited by 6
“…work on active sentence interpretation indicates that while predicting the patient in a sentence like, “ Toby arrests the . . . , ” adults look at both “ police ” and “ crook, ” indicating that both agent-and patient-associated information is activated in response to verbs (Kukona et al., 2011).”
BackgroundMouse-tracking evidence for parallel anticipatory option evaluation
Cranford, E. A., & Moss, J. (2018) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-017-0851-4 · Cited by 5
Kowalski, A., & Huang, Y.-T. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000389 · Cited by 5
Hung, J., Edmonds, L. A., & Reilly, J. J. (2016) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2016.1198818 · Cited by 5
Gauvin, H. S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Huettig, F. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00818 · Cited by 5
“…sensitivity of eye-movements to linguistic predictions in visual world studies (e.g., Altmann and Kamide, 1999; Weber et al., 2006; Kamide, 2008; Kukona et al., 2011; Mani and Huettig, 2012), 1Although it does not form part of this paper, we also successfully replicated the original Huettig and…”
ResultInfluence of syntactic complexity on second language prediction
Chun, E., Chen, S., Liu, S., & Chan, A. (2021) · Bilingual processing and acquisition · doi:10.1075/bpa.12.04chu · Cited by 8
Anticipating the garden path: The horse raced past the barn ate the cake
Altmann, G. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677139.003.0003 · Cited by 4
Ito, A. (2026) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-026-01857-7 · Cited by 2
“In such a context, the meaning of these contextual words may cue prediction of the target word without involving event simulation (Chow et al., 2016; Kukona, 2020; Kukona et al., 2011).”
Fernandez, L. B., Shehzad, M., & Hadley, L. V. (2025) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000001679 · Cited by 3
“…in the larger context, such looks to the verb-related image have been previously reported in college-aged adults, second language speakers, and children [Kukona et al. 2011; Borovsky et al. 2012; Peters et al. 2018], and been proposed to stem from thematic priming [Ferretti et al. 2001].”
Lee, R., Chambers, C. G., Huettig, F., & Ganea, P. A. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267297 · Cited by 5
“This is not unexpected, however, as prediction is often accompanied by a certain degree of lexicallydriven activation even when such an effect is in principle incongruent with broader sentence or discourse information [45].”
BackgroundOltrogge, E., Veríssimo, J., Patil, U., & Lago, S. (2025) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2025.104651 · Cited by 3
Milburn, E. A., Vulchanova, M., Vulchanov, V., Saltzman, D., & Magnuson, J. S. (2026) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-025-01843-5
“…language, we tend to talk about things that are likely to happen, and therefore our knowledge about both word co-occurrences and how the world works converges, allowing us to predict upcoming words (Altmann & Kamide, 1999; Borovsky et al., 2012; Kamide et al., 2003; Kukona et al., 2011, 2016).”
Self-citationLee, E.-K. R., & Phillips, C. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106255 · Cited by 2
Dutch–Mandarin learners’ online use of syntactic cues to anticipate mass vs. count interpretations
Yao, P.-P., Hall, D., Borer, H., & Stockall, L. (2023) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1177/02676583231175106 · Cited by 2
“This 200 ms buffer following the onset of a word is based on the mean time required to plan and launch an eye movement, and the typical lag observed between eye movements and fine-grained phonetic detail in the speech stream (Allopenna et al., 1998; Kukona et al., 2011).”
Processing Evidence for the Grammatical Encoding of the Mass/Count Distinction in Mandarin Chinese
Yao, P.-P., Stockall, L., Hall, D., & Borer, H. (2022) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-022-09844-0 · Cited by 2
Kukona, A., Cho, P. W., Magnuson, J. S., & Tabor, W. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0034903 · Cited by 43
“, Altmann & Kamide, 1999; Chambers & San Juan, 2008; Kamide, Altmann, & Haywood, 2003; Kamide, Scheepers, & Altmann, 2003; Knoeferle & Crocker, 2006, 2007) reveal that the language processing system rapidly uses the contextual constraints to predict upcoming linguistic input, effects of context-independent information…”
InfluentialSelf-citationPrediction in language comprehension across the lifespan
Federmeier, K. D., Chiu, H., Fisher, C. L., & Yu, Y. (2026) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-026-00599-2 · Cited by 2
“Anticipatory looks can be supported by semantic priming as well as by prediction, posing challenges in isolating active prediction 33–36 .”
InfluentialSpeech rate and associations in predictive sentence processing
Kukona, A. (2025) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-025-03160-0
“In addition, complementing findings like Kukona et al. (2011, 2014), these results suggest that comprehenders preactivate lexically associated representations that are otherwise unpredictable in sentences.”
InfluentialSelf-citationMultimodal Shannon Game with Images
Zouhar, V., Bhattacharya, S., & Bojar, O. (2023) · International Conference on Machine Learning, Optimization, and Data Science · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.11192 · Cited by 1
“For [22, 23] the modality was acoustic while our input modality was text and images.”
MethodPsychological and pedagogical conditions of integration of immigrants into the German society
Krutova-Soliman, N., Romanenko, N., & Shishlova, E. (2021) · Linguistics and Culture Review · doi:10.37028/lingcure.v5ns2.1338 · Cited by 1
“Integration courses are conducted within the framework of the state order and are regulated by the current legislation (Kukona et al., 2011; Lee & Lee, 2014).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Kukona, A., Fang, S.-Y., Aicher, K. A., Chen, H., & Magnuson, J. S.
- Affiliations
- Haskins Laboratories (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kukona, Anuenue
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-42
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3047461
- OpenAlex
- W1983622171
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC005765, DC0055765)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-01994, F31HD060414, R01HD040353, HD-40353, HD060414, P01HD001994)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- eye movements, passive sentences, syntactic cues, time course
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Cognition, Eye Movements, Humans, Language, Reaction Time, Eye Movement Measurements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review