The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scientific knowledge suppresses but does not supplant earlier intuitions
Abstract
When students learn scientific theories that conflict with their earlier, naïve theories, what happens to the earlier theories? Are they overwritten or merely suppressed? We investigated this question by devising and implementing a novel speeded-reasoning task. Adults with many years of science education verified two types of statements as quickly as possible: statements whose truth value was the same across both naïve and scientific theories of a particular phenomenon (e.g., "The moon revolves around the Earth") and statements involving the same conceptual relations but whose truth value differed across those theories (e.g., "The Earth revolves around the sun"). Participants verified the latter significantly more slowly and less accurately than the former across 10 domains of knowledge (astronomy, evolution, fractions, genetics, germs, matter, mechanics, physiology, thermodynamics, and waves), suggesting that naïve theories survive the acquisition of a mutually incompatible scientific theory, coexisting with that theory for many years to follow.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Even for people who learned 'correlation is not causation' with classroom examples, it could still be challenging to apply their learning to new contexts [46, 38].”
From Illusion of Causality in Visualized Data (2020) · cites this paper as [46]
Citations
Cites
Carey, S. E. (2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1037/e513702014-002 · Cited by 2,324
Does Language Shape Thought?: Mandarin and English Speakers' Conceptions of Time
Boroditsky, L. (2001) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.2001.0748 · Cited by 1,815
How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Kemp, C., Griffiths, T. L., & Goodman, N. D. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1192788 · Cited by 1,815
Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change
Vosniadou, S. (1994) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3 · Cited by 1,421
Toward an Epistemology of Physics
diSessa, A. A. (1993) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008 · Cited by 1,351
Toward an epistemology of physics
diSessa, A. A. (1993) · Cited by 1,265
Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics
Clement, J. (1982) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.12989 · Cited by 1,258
The Child's Conception of Physical Causality
P., J., Piaget, J., & Gabain, M. (1932) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1415393 · Cited by 1,176
From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts
Michelene, T. H., Slotta, J. D., & Leeuw, N. D. (1994) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90017-5 · Cited by 990
Cognitive Development: Foundational Theories Of Core Domains
Wellman, H. M., & Gelman, S. A. (1992) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.002005 · Cited by 986
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 424
Bryce, T. G. K., & Blown, E. J. (2020) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-019-09898-6 · Cited by 8
Deterministic or probabilistic: U.S. children's beliefs about genetic inheritance
Menéndez, D., Donovan, A. M., Mathiaparanam, O. N., Seitz, V., Sabbagh, N. F., Klapper, R. E., Kalish, C. W., Rosengren, K. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2024) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.14053 · Cited by 10
Masón, L., Borella, E., Diakidoy, I. N., Butterfuss, R., Kendeou, P., & Carretti, B. (2020) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2020.1826248 · Cited by 8
Lovitt, C. F., & Shuyler, K. (2016) · ACS symposium series · doi:10.1021/bk-2016-1232.ch012 · Cited by 8
A Right Way to Explain? Function, Mechanism, and the Order of ExplanationsPreprint
McCarthy, A. M., & Keil, F. C. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4222742 · Cited by 10
Potvin, P., & Bélanger, M. (2024) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2024.1404875 · Cited by 7
Renouard, A., & Mazabraud, Y. (2018) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-018-0026-9 · Cited by 10
Mermelstein, S., & German, T. C. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.739070 · Cited by 9
Prompting Children’s Belief Revision About Balance Through Primary and Secondary Sources of Evidence
Larsen, N. E., Venkadasalam, V. P., & Ganea, P. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01503 · Cited by 7
Visual Attention Pattern of Middle School Students During Problem‐Solving in Physics
Wang, Q., Zhu, Y., Wei, L., & Deng, H. (2022) · Mind Brain and Education · doi:10.1111/mbe.12313 · Cited by 8
Digital vs. Analog Learning—Two Content-Similar Interventions and Learning Outcomes
Fleissner-Martin, J., Bogner, F. X., & Paul, J. (2023) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f14091807 · Cited by 7
Development and Coherence of Beliefs Regarding Disease Causality and Prevention
Sigelman, C. K. (2014) · Applied Developmental Science · doi:10.1080/10888691.2014.950734 · Cited by 7
Revising deference: Intuitive beliefs about category structure constrain expert deference
Noyes, A., & Keil, F. C. (2017) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2017.02.003 · Cited by 7
Ekström, L., & Lundholm, C. (2017) · Journal of Political Science Education · doi:10.1080/15512169.2017.1370378 · Cited by 7
Sustainability Science and Planning: A Crucial Collaboration?
Jepson, E. J. (2019) · Planning Theory & Practice · doi:10.1080/14649357.2019.1571219 · Cited by 7
Bučková, A., & Prokša, M. (2020) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/d0rp00156b · Cited by 7
Stern, F., Delaval, M., Kampourakis, K., & Müller, A. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242189 · Cited by 7
Contextualized Knowledge Reduces Misconceived COVID-19 Health Decisions
Murray, G., Willer, C. J., Arner, T., Roche, J. M., & Morris, B. J. (2021) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.07.007 · Cited by 7
Adapting Evolution Education to a Warming Climate of Teaching and Learning
Sinatra, G. M., & Danielson, R. (2016) · Evolutionary psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-29986-0_11 · Cited by 7
Can Science Beat Out Intuition? Increasing the Accessibility of Counterintuitive Scientific Ideas.
Young, A. G., Laca, J. A., Dieffenbach, G., Hossain, E., Mann, D., & Shtulman, A. (2018) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 6
Self-citationExploring the effectiveness of virtual reality in combating misinformation on climate change
Erişen, E., Yildirim, F., Duran, E., Şar, B., & Kalkan, I. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.13057 · Cited by 7
Executive function as a predictor of physics-related conceptual change
Thibault, F., & Potvin, P. (2018) · Neuroeducation · doi:10.24046/neuroed.20180502.119 · Cited by 6
Rofieq, A., & Fauzi, A. (2022) · Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia · doi:10.15294/jpii.v11i2.35768 · Cited by 6
Natural-Theological Understanding from Childhood to Adulthood
Petrovich, O. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315674964 · Cited by 7
Reed, S. K. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197529003.003.0008 · Cited by 6
Conceptual distinctions and preferential alignment across rational number representations
Qiu, K., & Wang, Y. (2020) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-020-00502-4 · Cited by 5
Implementasi Scientific Approach dalam Mengembangkan Multiple Intelligences Anak Usia Dini
Laely, K., & Subiyanto, S. (2021) · Jurnal Obsesi Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini · doi:10.31004/obsesi.v5i2.730 · Cited by 5
Representational Pluralism in Science Education
Flores-Camacho, F., & Gallegos-Cázares, L. (2024) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-024-00559-3 · Cited by 5
Versteeg, M., Hafkemeijer, A., de Beaufort, A. J., & Paul Steendijk, A. (2020) · Mind Brain and Education · doi:10.1111/mbe.12273 · Cited by 6
Are formal explanations mere placeholders or pointers?
Rivera, S., Prasad, S., & Prasada, S. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105407 · Cited by 5
Fragmented and conflicted: folk beliefs about vision
Fischer, E., Allen, K., & Engelhardt, P. E. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04066-w · Cited by 7
The illusion of pure reason in science: A cautionary note
Miller, R. R. (2023) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2023.104863 · Cited by 6
Menéndez, D., Labotka, D., Umscheid, V. A., & Gelman, S. A. (2024) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.14110 · Cited by 5
The Case for Heterogeneity in Metacognitive Appraisals of Biased Beliefs
Cusimano, C. (2024) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683241251520 · Cited by 5
Landes, E., & Reuter, K. (2025) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-025-00769-w · Cited by 5
Jach, Ł. (2021) · Current Issues in Personality Psychology · doi:10.5114/cipp.2021.104596 · Cited by 5
Fischer, J., Machts, N., Møller, J., & Harms, U. (2021) · Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/s40573-021-00136-z · Cited by 5
Alternative causal explanations for order break the link between order and agentsPreprint
Schachner, A., & Kim, M. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/jd2qr · Cited by 5
Korur, F., Avcı, D. E., & Gürkan, Ş. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251403736 · Cited by 4
Performance assessment to assess students’ interpretation in chemistry learning
Utami, B., Saputro, S., Ashadi, A., Masykuri, M., & Widoretno, S. (2019) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/1.5139867 · Cited by 4
Promoting Metacognitive Awareness and Self-Regulation of Intuitive Thinking in Evolution Education
Hartelt, T., & Martens, H. (2025) · The American Biology Teacher · doi:10.1525/abt.2025.87.2.113 · Cited by 4
Hast, M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-9861-6_2 · Cited by 4
How to Test the Ship of Theseus
Terrone, E. (2020) · dialectica · doi:10.48106/dial.v74.i3.06 · Cited by 4
Edelsbrunner, P. A. (2024) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-024-00500-8 · Cited by 4
Class, B., Schneider, D., Laroussi, M., & Lombard, F. (2016) · Distances et médiations des savoirs · doi:10.4000/dms.1349 · Cited by 4
Middle School Students’ Approaches to Reasoning about Disconfirming Evidence
Varma, K., Boekel, M. V., & Varma, S. (2018) · Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology · doi:10.5539/jedp.v8n1p28 · Cited by 4
Learning About Archaeology and Prehistoric Life
Besse, M., Fragnière, S., Müller, A., Piguet, M., Dubois, L., Miéville, D., Schoeb, S., & Schumacher, D. (2019) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-019-00047-z · Cited by 4
Engineering Students' Thinking About Technical Systems: An Ontological Categories Approach
Hofer, S. I., Reinhold, F., Loch, F., & Vogel‐Heuser, B. (2020) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2020.00066 · Cited by 4
The Role of Critical Thinking and Executive Function in Misconceptions in Psychology
Murti, H. A. S., Hastjarjo, T. D., & Patria, B. (2021) · Jurnal Psikologi · doi:10.14710/jp.20.1.10-21 · Cited by 4
Blown, E. J., & Bryce, T. G. K. (2022) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-021-10032-8 · Cited by 4
Reed, S. K. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197529003.003.0015 · Cited by 4
Anthropic thinking about global climate change
Betz, N. (2019) · Digital Repository Service (Northeastern University) · doi:10.17760/d20318389 · Cited by 4
Development and validation of an instrument to measure epistemic beliefs and attitudes
Dang, T. Q. H. (2013) · doi:10.70675/875b6470zcefbz4c15z9d9bz5eb2286bea6d · Cited by 4
The effects of beliefs on correcting misinformation in memory
Collin, S. H. P., & Klincewicz, M. (2025) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2025.2553923 · Cited by 3
Why People Make Irrational Choices About Their Health?
Šrol, J., & Čavojová, V. (2022) · Integrated science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96814-4_8 · Cited by 3
Religion as a Testing Ground for Cognitive Science
Shtulman, A. (2022) · Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion · doi:10.1558/jcsr.20641 · Cited by 3
Self-citationExecutive function predictors of science achievement in middle-school students
Varma, K., Boekel, M. V., Aylward, G., & Varma, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1197002 · Cited by 3
What insights can response times provide for education research?
Bélanger, É., Foisy, L. B., & Masson, S. (2024) · International Journal of Research & Method in Education · doi:10.1080/1743727x.2024.2336146 · Cited by 3
Harada, Y., & Hino, S. (2024) · Mind Brain and Education · doi:10.1111/mbe.12429 · Cited by 3
Effects of Familiarity and Complexity on Inhibitory Control in Elementary Science Learning
Bélanger, É., Foisy, L. B., Masson, S., Ahr, E., & Potvin, P. (2025) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2025.2513246 · Cited by 4
How do people evaluate problem-solving strategies? Efficiency and intuitiveness matter.
Brown, S. A., Menéndez, D., & Alibali, M. W. (2018) · Cognitive Science · Cited by 3
A Case of Sustained Internal Contradiction: Unresolved Ambivalence between Evolution and Creationism
Metz, S. E., Weisberg, D. S., & Weisberg, M. (2020) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/15685373-12340088 · Cited by 3
Neural Mechanisms of Inhibition in Scientific Reasoning: Insights from fNIRS
Liu, D., Jamshaid, S., & Wang, L. (2024) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci14060606 · Cited by 4
Reed, S. K. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197529003.003.0002 · Cited by 3
Thematic Content Analysis of Studies Concerning Misconceptions in Science Education in Turkey
ÖZCAN, F., & Bakır, S. (2023) · Sakarya University Journal of Education · doi:10.19126/suje.1254983 · Cited by 3
Abadzi, H. (2014) · Peabody Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/0161956x.2014.862472 · Cited by 3
Why Do Logically Incompatible Beliefs Seem Psychologically Compatible?
Shtulman, A., & Young, A. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203703809-11 · Cited by 3
Self-citationInfluence of Internet-Based Messages and Personal Motivations on Water-Use Decisions
Harmon, D., & Gauvain, M. (2019) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2019.1654866 · Cited by 3
Analyzing Students’ Mental Models of Technical Systems
Vogel‐Heuser, B., Loch, F., Hofer, S. I., Neumann, E.-M., Reinhold, F., Scheuerer, S., Zinn, J., & Reiss, K. M. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) · doi:10.1109/indin41052.2019.8972071 · Cited by 3
A Tale of Two Perspectives: How Psychology and Neuroscience Contribute to Understanding Personhood
Smith, E. I. (2021) · Scientia et Fides · doi:10.12775/setf.2021.017 · Cited by 5
Revising Misconceptions Using Multiple Documents
Butterfuss, R. (2020) · University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) · Cited by 3
Clark, C. A. C., Behrendt, M. G., Long, T. M., & Dauer, J. T. (2025) · Trends in Neuroscience and Education · doi:10.1016/j.tine.2025.100253 · Cited by 3
It’s time to reconsider: the neuropsychology of belief change
Hoffman, B. H., Subramaniam, A., & Hartley, K. (2025) · Trends in Neuroscience and Education · doi:10.1016/j.tine.2025.100261 · Cited by 2
Hu, B., Lu, C. F., & Ju, X. (2025) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edaf047 · Cited by 2
Wang, Y., Lin, H. Y., Kim, B., & Kim, Y. (2025) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612251351149 · Cited by 3
The roles of switching and inhibition in adult counterintuitive scientific thinking
Ellefson, M. R., Wang, R., Britton, A., Godfrey, H., & Feeney, A. (2025) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106377 · Cited by 2
Repairing Errors With Elaborative Feedback in Computerised Learning Environments
Martínez, T., García, A., Cerdán, R., & Vidal‐Abarca, E. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70199 · Cited by 2
Bodas, A., & Kelemen, D. A. (2026) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2026.101948 · Cited by 3
Role of inhibitory control in adults’ mathematical equivalence knowledge
Grenell, A., & Fyfe, E. R. (2024) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218241280941 · Cited by 2
Using Item Option Characteristics Curve (IOCC) to Unfold Misconception on Chemical Reaction
Qudratuddarsi, H., Ramadhana, N., Indriyanti, N., & Ismail, A. I. (2024) · Journal of Tropical Chemistry Research and Education · doi:10.14421/jtcre.2024.62-04 · Cited by 2
Being With a Dying, Nonreligious Person
Alexopoulos, G. S. (2025) · American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2025.09.006 · Cited by 2
Investigating Mental Models of Mechanical Engineering Students
Loch, F., Vogel‐Heuser, B., Reinhold, F., Böck, S., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2019) · International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET) · doi:10.1109/ithet46829.2019.8937356 · Cited by 2
Ахметовна, И. Л., Lukyanov, A. V., Bikmetov, E., Pushkareva, M., & Valiullina, Z. (2021) · Linguistics and Culture Review · doi:10.21744/lingcure.v5ns4.1749 · Cited by 2
Παρανοήσεις των μαθητών στις αριθμητικές πράξεις μέσα από την προσέγγιση της εννοιολογικής αλλαγής
Χρήστου, Κ. Π. (2022) · Psychology the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society · doi:10.12681/psyhps.30685 · Cited by 2
Managing Wide Plurality Through Metarepresentations
Bélanger, M., & Richard, V. (2024) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-024-00556-6 · Cited by 2
Challenges and opportunities in stimulating public awareness and engagement on US chemicals policy
Scruggs, C. E., & Moore, R. B. B. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-016-0387-4 · Cited by 2
Goodman, M. (2016) · NeuroQuantology · doi:10.14704/nq.2016.14.1.890 · Cited by 2
Tempelmann, S., Sowula, J., & Cacchione, T. (2024) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2024.2324852 · Cited by 2
Explanations in the wildPreprint
Sulik, J., van Paridon, J., & Lupyan, G. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/djaex · Cited by 2
Johnson, S. G. B., Royka, A. L., McNally, P., & Keil, F. C. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/45rth · Cited by 2
Studying science denial with a complex problem-solving taskPreprint
Sulik, J., & McKay, R. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/huxm7 · Cited by 2
Cognitive flexibility moderates shifts in plausibility judgments of claims about climate change
Medrano, J., Mohan, S., & Lombardi, D. (2025) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2025.2499413 · Cited by 1
Self-Explanation Strategies enhance the inhibition of intuitive misconception: Insights from ERP
Ye, J., Li, J., Jin, Y., Teng, Y., & Zhang, M. (2025) · X-Disciplinarity · doi:10.63174/xdi.oetn9214 · Cited by 1
Scientific or naïve? Perceptions of direct and indirect realism, and why they matter
Fischer, E., Allen, K., & Engelhardt, P. E. (2025) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.70063 · Cited by 1
Love is in the soul, math is in the brain: Dualist intuitions and belief in psychological science
Cruz, F., & Mata, A. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104845 · Cited by 1
Why learning redox is difficult even with animations – students’ adherence to cognitive resources
Niyamae, A. N., & Cheng, M. M. W. (2025) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/d5rp00192g · Cited by 1
Carruthers, P. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198843702.003.0002 · Cited by 1
Vosniadou, S. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-817414-2.00015-4 · Cited by 1
Liu, D., Jamshaid, S., & Wang, L. (2023) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/wnr.0000000000001987 · Cited by 1
Konzeptwechsel, Konzeptwandel oder Konzeptprävalenz?
Thurn, C. (2024) · Pädagogik · doi:10.14361/9783839468968-002 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Shtulman, A., & Valcarcel, J.
- Affiliations
- Occidental College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shtulman, Andrew
- ORCID
- Shtulman, Andrew
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-215
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140347507
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 83.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (DRL-0953384)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- naive theories, scientific knowledge, intuitive theories, theory change, conceptual change, science education
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Concept Formation, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Science, Knowledge, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review