The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scientific knowledge suppresses but does not supplant earlier intuitions
Abstract
When students learn scientific theories that conflict with their earlier, naïve theories, what happens to the earlier theories? Are they overwritten or merely suppressed? We investigated this question by devising and implementing a novel speeded-reasoning task. Adults with many years of science education verified two types of statements as quickly as possible: statements whose truth value was the same across both naïve and scientific theories of a particular phenomenon (e.g., "The moon revolves around the Earth") and statements involving the same conceptual relations but whose truth value differed across those theories (e.g., "The Earth revolves around the sun"). Participants verified the latter significantly more slowly and less accurately than the former across 10 domains of knowledge (astronomy, evolution, fractions, genetics, germs, matter, mechanics, physiology, thermodynamics, and waves), suggesting that naïve theories survive the acquisition of a mutually incompatible scientific theory, coexisting with that theory for many years to follow.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Even for people who learned 'correlation is not causation' with classroom examples, it could still be challenging to apply their learning to new contexts [46, 38].”
From Illusion of Causality in Visualized Data (2020) · cites this paper as [46]
Citations
Cites
Carey, S. E. (2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1037/e513702014-002 · Cited by 2,324
Does Language Shape Thought?: Mandarin and English Speakers' Conceptions of Time
Boroditsky, L. (2001) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.2001.0748 · Cited by 1,815
How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Kemp, C., Griffiths, T. L., & Goodman, N. D. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1192788 · Cited by 1,815
Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change
Vosniadou, S. (1994) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3 · Cited by 1,421
Toward an Epistemology of Physics
diSessa, A. A. (1993) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008 · Cited by 1,351
Toward an epistemology of physics
diSessa, A. A. (1993) · Cited by 1,265
Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics
Clement, J. (1982) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.12989 · Cited by 1,258
The Child's Conception of Physical Causality
P., J., Piaget, J., & Gabain, M. (1932) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1415393 · Cited by 1,176
From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts
Michelene, T. H., Slotta, J. D., & Leeuw, N. D. (1994) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90017-5 · Cited by 990
Cognitive Development: Foundational Theories Of Core Domains
Wellman, H. M., & Gelman, S. A. (1992) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.002005 · Cited by 986
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., Kendeou, P., Vraga, E. K., & Amazeen, M. A. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y · Cited by 1,372
Sinatra, G. M., Kienhues, D., & Hofer, B. K. (2014) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.916216 · Cited by 393
Domain-specific prior knowledge and learning: A meta-analysis
Simonsmeier, B. A., Flaig, M., Deiglmayr, A., Schalk, L., & Schneider, M. (2021) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2021.1939700 · Cited by 314
The Development of Students' Understanding of Science
Vosniadou, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00032 · Cited by 212
Garrett, R., Nisbet, E. C., & Lynch, E. K. (2013) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12038 · Cited by 180
Coley, J. D., & Tanner, K. D. (2015) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.14-06-0094 · Cited by 190
(1985) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.3730690304 · Cited by 173
Edelsbrunner, P. A., Simonsmeier, B. A., & Schneider, M. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09982-y · Cited by 205
The representation of fraction magnitudes and the whole number bias reconsidered
DeWolf, M., & Vosniadou, S. (2014) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.07.002 · Cited by 179
Masson, S., Potvin, P., Riopel, M., & Foisy, L. B. (2014) · Mind Brain and Education · doi:10.1111/mbe.12043 · Cited by 181
Illusions of causality: how they bias our everyday thinking and how they could be reduced
Matute, H., Blanco, F., Yarritu, I., Díaz‐Lago, M., Vadillo, M. A., & Barberia, I. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00888 · Cited by 183
Relational categories as a bridge between cognitive and educational research.
Goldwater, M. B., & Schalk, L. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000043 · Cited by 171
(2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198843702.001.0001 · Cited by 138
Plausibility Judgments in Conceptual Change and Epistemic Cognition
Lombardi, D., Nussbaum, E. M., & Sinatra, G. M. (2015) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1113134 · Cited by 146
Tensions Between Science and Intuition Across the Lifespan
Shtulman, A., & Harrington, K. (2015) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12174 · Cited by 146
Self-citationJärnefelt, E., Canfield, C. F., & Kelemen, D. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.005 · Cited by 133
Adults are intuitive mind-body dualists.
Forstmann, M., & Burgmer, P. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000045 · Cited by 134
Nadelson, L. S., Heddy, B. C., Jones, S. H., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Johnson, M. L. (2018) · International Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.17583/ijep.2018.3349 · Cited by 138
Is inhibition involved in overcoming a common physics misconception in mechanics?
Foisy, L. B., Potvin, P., Riopel, M., & Masson, S. (2015) · Trends in Neuroscience and Education · doi:10.1016/j.tine.2015.03.001 · Cited by 134
How Children and Adults Represent God's Mind
Heiphetz, L., Lane, J. D., Waytz, A. G., & Young, L. (2015) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12232 · Cited by 113
Potvin, P., & Cyr, G. (2017) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21396 · Cited by 111
Override the controversy: Analytic thinking predicts endorsement of evolution
Gervais, W. M. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.011 · Cited by 115
Theories of development: In dialog with Jean Piaget
Carey, S. E., Zaitchik, D., & Bascandziev, I. (2015) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.003 · Cited by 124
Potvin, P., Masson, S., Lafortune, S., & Cyr, G. (2014) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9520-6 · Cited by 111
Čavojová, V., Šrol, J., & Jurkovič, M. (2019) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3595 · Cited by 103
Peters, G.-J., Ruiter, R. A. C., ten Hoor, G. A., Kessels, L. T. E., & Kok, G. (2018) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2018.1454846 · Cited by 92
Illusion of Causality in Visualized Data
Xiong, C., Shapiro, J., Hullman, J., & Franconeri, S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2019.2934399 · Cited by 71
Emmons, N. A., Haggerty, K. L., & Kelemen, D. A. (2017) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21421 · Cited by 76
Inhibitory control and counterintuitive science and maths reasoning in adolescence
Brookman‐Byrne, A., Mareschal, D., Tolmie, A. K., & Dumontheil, I. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0198973 · Cited by 82
Coley, J. D., Arenson, M. B., Xu, Y., & Tanner, K. D. (2016) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.11.001 · Cited by 70
Inhibition and Conceptual Learning in Science: a Review of Studies
Masón, L., & Zaccoletti, S. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09529-x · Cited by 66
Vosniadou, S. (2014) · European Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17405629.2014.921153 · Cited by 64
Talanquer, V. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/ed400311x · Cited by 70
Thinking like a scientist: Innateness as a case study
Knobe, J., & Samuels, R. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.003 · Cited by 63
The Landscape of Research on Prior Knowledge and Learning: a Bibliometric Analysis
Bittermann, A., McNamara, D. S., Simonsmeier, B. A., & Schneider, M. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09775-9 · Cited by 77
Representing the Mind as Such in Infancy
Carruthers, P. (2020) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-020-00491-9 · Cited by 61
Cultural influences on the teleological stance: evidence from China
Rottman, J., Zhu, L., Wang, W., Schillaci, R. S., Clark, K. J., & Kelemen, D. A. (2016) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2015.1118402 · Cited by 66
Larrain, A., Freire, P., López, P., & Grau, V. (2019) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2019.1627360 · Cited by 60
Potvin, P. (2013) · Neuroeducation · doi:10.24046/neuroed.20130201.16 · Cited by 61
Inquiry-based learning and E-learning: how to serve high and low achievers
Sotiriou, S. A., Lazoudis, A., & Bogner, F. X. (2020) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-020-00130-x · Cited by 69
Potvin, P., Sauriol, É., & Riopel, M. (2015) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21235 · Cited by 59
Children’s Ability to Learn Evolutionary Explanations for Biological Adaptation
Shtulman, A., Neal, C., & Lindquist, G. (2016) · Early Education and Development · doi:10.1080/10409289.2016.1154418 · Cited by 64
Self-citationSource credibility and the processing of refutation texts
Boekel, M. V., Lassonde, K. A., O’Brien, E. J., & Kendeou, P. (2016) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0649-0 · Cited by 59
Primed analytic thought and religiosity: The importance of individual characteristics.
Yonker, J. E., Edman, L. R. O., Cresswell, J., & Barrett, J. L. (2016) · Psychology of Religion and Spirituality · doi:10.1037/rel0000095 · Cited by 61
Thagard, P. R. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190678722.001.0001 · Cited by 56
Keeping track of ‘alternative facts’: The neural correlates of processing misinformation corrections
Gordon, A., Susanne Quadflieg, A., Brooks, J. C. W., Ecker, U. K. H., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.014 · Cited by 59
Roberts, S. O., Weisman, K., Lane, J. D., Williams, A. D., Camp, N. P., Wang, M., Robison, M., Sanchez, K., & Griffiths, C. M. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000233 · Cited by 55
Vosniadou, S., & Skopeliti, I. (2017) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1361557 · Cited by 54
The Role of Inhibition in Conceptual Learning from Refutation and Standard Expository Texts
Masón, L., Zaccoletti, S., Carretti, B., Scrimin, S., & Diakidoy, I. N. (2018) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-017-9874-7 · Cited by 58
The Recruitment of Shifting and Inhibition in On‐line Science and Mathematics Tasks
Vosniadou, S., Pnevmatikos, D., Makris, N., Lepenioti, D., Eikospentaki, K., Chountala, A., & Kyrianakis, G. (2018) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12624 · Cited by 55
Kim, J. J. H., Betz, N., Helmuth, B. S. T., & Coley, J. D. (2023) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12653 · Cited by 50
Schneider, M., & Simonsmeier, B. A. (2025) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102744 · Cited by 56
Attributes of God: Conceptual Foundations of a Foundational Belief
Shtulman, A., & Lindeman, M. (2015) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12253 · Cited by 53
Self-citationShtulman, A., & Legare, C. H. (2019) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12483 · Cited by 53
Self-citationGiving Up on Consciousness as the Ghost in the Machine
Halligan, P. W., & Oakley, D. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.571460 · Cited by 47
Hartelt, T., & Martens, H. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1450947 · Cited by 52
The Development of Children's Prelife Reasoning: Evidence From Two Cultures
Emmons, N. A., & Kelemen, D. (2014) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12220 · Cited by 46
Bascandziev, I., Tardiff, N., Zaitchik, D., & Carey, S. E. (2018) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.03.002 · Cited by 45
Torcello, L. (2016) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12179 · Cited by 49
Conceptual control: on the feasibility of conceptual engineering
Fischer, E. (2020) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2020.1773309 · Cited by 43
Intuition and insight: two concepts that illuminate the tacit in science education
Brock, R. (2015) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057267.2015.1049843 · Cited by 49
An fMRI study of scientists with a Ph.D. in physics confronted with naive ideas in science
Allaire‐Duquette, G., Foisy, L. B., Potvin, P., Riopel, M., Larose, M., & Masson, S. (2021) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-021-00091-x · Cited by 46
Richard, M., Coley, J. D., & Tanner, K. D. (2017) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.16-11-0317 · Cited by 40
The coexistence claim and its possible implications for success in teaching for conceptual “change”
Potvin, P. (2017) · European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.30935/scimath/9497 · Cited by 40
Williams, E. F., Dunning, D. A., & Kruger, J. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0032416 · Cited by 40
Chang, C., Pascua, L., & Ess, F. (2017) · Journal of Geography · doi:10.1080/00221341.2017.1287768 · Cited by 39
Potvin, P., Malenfant-Robichaud, G., Cormier, C., & Masson, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2020.542458 · Cited by 49
Core Intuitions About Persons Coexist and Interfere With Acquired Christian Beliefs About God
Barlev, M., Mermelstein, S., & German, T. C. (2016) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12435 · Cited by 41
Searching for the cognitive basis of anti-vaccination attitudes
Lindeman, M., Svedholm‐Häkkinen, A. M., & Riekki, T. J. J. (2022) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2022.2046158 · Cited by 39
Developing an Analytical Framework to Characterize Student Reasoning about Complex Processes
Scott, E. E., Anderson, C., Mashood, K. K., Matz, R. L., Underwood, S. M., & Sawtelle, V. (2018) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.17-10-0225 · Cited by 37
How Lay Cognition Constrains Scientific Cognition
Shtulman, A. (2015) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12260 · Cited by 39
Self-citationSkepticism and the acquisition of “knowledge”
Nichols, S., & Pinillos, N. Á. (2018) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12179 · Cited by 37
Potvin, P., Turmel, É., & Masson, S. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00014 · Cited by 38
Jee, B. D., Uttal, D. H., SPIEGEL, A. N., & Diamond, J. (2013) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662513496954 · Cited by 36
Matuk, C. F., Zhang, J., Uk, I., & Linn, M. C. (2019) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21533 · Cited by 35
Schmaltz, R. M., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00336 · Cited by 40
Refutation texts and argumentation for conceptual change: A winning or a redundant combination?
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Resnick, M. S. (2019) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101265 · Cited by 34
Executive Functions and Conceptual Change in Science and Mathematics Learning.
Vosniadou, S., Pnevmatikos, D., Makris, N., Eikospentaki, K., Lepenioti, D., Chountala, A., & Kyrianakis, G. (2015) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 33
Karin, J. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00431 · Cited by 35
Reith, M., & Nehring, A. (2020) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2020.1834168 · Cited by 33
Legal Concepts and Legal Expertise
Tobia, K. P. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04512-3 · Cited by 33
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Dotan, A. (2017) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-017-9441-1 · Cited by 32
Scott, E. E., Wenderoth, M. P., & Doherty, J. H. (2019) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-03-0059 · Cited by 32
Cognitive Construal-Consistent Instructor Language in the Undergraduate Biology Classroom
Betz, N., Leffers, J. S., Thor, E. D., Fux, M., de Nesnera, K., Tanner, K. D., & Coley, J. D. (2019) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-04-0076 · Cited by 34
Tackling Scientific Misconceptions: The Element of Surprise
Theobald, M., & Brod, G. (2021) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13582 · Cited by 32
A literature review of children’s and youth’s conceptions of the internet
Babari, P., Hielscher, M., Edelsbrunner, P. A., Conti, M., Honegger, B. D., & Marinus, E. (2023) · International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2023.100595 · Cited by 31
The Belief in Magic in the Age of Science
Subbotsky, E. V. (2014) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244014521433 · Cited by 31
Explanatory pluralism across cultures and development
Legare, C. H., & Shtulman, A. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198789710.003.0019 · Cited by 31
Self-citationCrooks, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00884 · Cited by 33
Interpreting Data: The Hybrid Mind
Heisterkamp, K., & Talanquer, V. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00589 · Cited by 31
Processing of misinformation as motivational and cognitive biases
Zhou, Y., & Shen, L. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1430953 · Cited by 30
KReC-MD: Knowledge Revision with Multiple Documents
Butterfuss, R., & Kendeou, P. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09603-y · Cited by 30
Hofer, S. I., Schumacher, R., & Rubin, H. (2017) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-017-0080-5 · Cited by 30
Hartelt, T., & Martens, H. (2024) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21938 · Cited by 31
Sotiriou, S. A., Bybee, R. W., & Bogner, F. X. (2017) · International Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.5430/ijhe.v6n2p8 · Cited by 35
Barlev, M., & Shtulman, A. (2021) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000298 · Cited by 32
Self-citationThorn, C. J., Bissinger, K., Thorn, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147802 · Cited by 29
Allaire‐Duquette, G., Bélanger, M., Grabner, R. H., Koschutnig, K., & Masson, S. (2019) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.24435 · Cited by 29
Event‐Related Potential Evidence for Persistence of an Intuitive Misconception About Electricity
Zhu, Y., Zhang, L., Leng, Y., Pang, R., & Wang, X. (2019) · Mind Brain and Education · doi:10.1111/mbe.12188 · Cited by 29
A Theory of Knowledge Revision: The Development of the KReC Framework
Kendeou, P. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09885-y · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Shtulman, A., & Valcarcel, J.
- Affiliations
- Occidental College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shtulman, Andrew
- ORCID
- Shtulman, Andrew
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-215
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140347507
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 83.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (DRL-0953384)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- naive theories, scientific knowledge, intuitive theories, theory change, conceptual change, science education
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Concept Formation, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Science, Knowledge, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review