The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantified statements are recalled as generics: Evidence from preschool children and adults
Open accessAbstract
Generics are sentences such as "ravens are black" and "tigers are striped", which express generalizations concerning kinds. Quantified statements such as "all tigers are striped" or "most ravens are black" also express generalizations, but unlike generics, they specify how many members of the kind have the property in question. Recently, some theorists have proposed that generics express cognitively fundamental/default generalizations, and that quantified statements in contrast express cognitively more sophisticated generalizations (Gelman, 2010; Leslie, 2008). If this hypothesis is correct, then quantified statements may be remembered as generics. This paper presents four studies with 136 preschool children and 118 adults, demonstrating that adults and preschoolers alike tend to recall quantified statements as generics, thus supporting the hypothesis that generics express cognitively default generalizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“with quantified statements often misremembered as generic (32).”
From Generic language in scientific communication (2019) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“They appear to be a default mode of generalization”
From Generic language in scientific communication (2019) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.
Kintsch, W. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.163 · Cited by 4,618
(2007) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.4135/9781446212967.n15 · Cited by 3,749
The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases
Heim, I. (1982) · ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8100764 · Cited by 3,003
Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674866270 · Cited by 2,653
Murphy, G. L. (2002) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1602.001.0001 · Cited by 2,650
On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.
Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.110.3.306 · Cited by 2,562
Rosch, E. H. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0 · Cited by 2,561
Carey, S. E. (2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1037/e513702014-002 · Cited by 2,324
The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning
Holyoak, K. J., & Morrison, B. (2005) · Cited by 2,133
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Khemlani, S., Leslie, S. J., Glucksberg, S., & Rubio-Fernandez, P. (2007). Do ducks lay eggs? How humans interpret generic assertions. In Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the cognitive science society. Nashville, TN: Cognitive Science Society.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Generic language in scientific communication
DeJesus, J. M., Callanan, M. A., Solis, G., & Gelman, S. A. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1817706116 · Cited by 157
Self-citationNegation: A theory of its meaning, representation, and use
Khemlani, S., Orenes, I., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2012.660913 · Cited by 157
The Oxford Handbook of Experimental Semantics and Pragmatics
Cummins, C., & Katsos, N. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.001.0001 · Cited by 123
Do all ducks lay eggs? The generic overgeneralization effect
Leslie, S., Khemlani, S., & Glucksberg, S. (2011) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.12.005 · Cited by 114
Self-citationInferences about members of kinds: The generics hypothesis
Khemlani, S., Leslie, S., & Glucksberg, S. (2011) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.601900 · Cited by 88
Self-citationWhat a Loaded Generalization: Generics and Social Cognition
Wodak, D., Leslie, S., & Rhodes, M. (2015) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12250 · Cited by 84
Self-citationIdeology and the Persuasive Use of Presupposition
Sbisà, M. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192844125.003.0004 · Cited by 80
Leslie, S. (2013) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12039 · Cited by 76
Self-citationVasilyeva, N. Y., & Lombrozo, T. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104383 · Cited by 74
Generics Are a Cognitive Default: Evidence From Sentence Processing
Meyer, M. A., Gelman, S. A., & Stilwell, S. M. (2011) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 65
Self-citationGeneralization Bias in Science
Peters, U., Krauss, A., & Braganza, O. (2022) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13188 · Cited by 63
Memory for generic and quantified sentences in Spanish-speaking children and adults
Gelman, S. A., Tapia, I. S., & Leslie, S. (2015) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000915000483 · Cited by 62
Self-citationRemembering kinds: New evidence that categories are privileged in children’s thinking
Cimpian, A., & Erickson, L. C. (2011) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.11.002 · Cited by 67
Generics designate kinds but not always essences
Noyes, A., & Keil, F. C. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1900105116 · Cited by 62
McConnell‐Ginet, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108641302 · Cited by 61
Generics Articulate Default Generalizations
Leslie, S. (2012) · Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes · doi:10.4000/rlv.2048 · Cited by 56
Self-citationAre stereotypes accurate? A perspective from the cognitive science of concepts
Bian, L., & Cimpian, A. (2017) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x15002307 · Cited by 53
Genericity is Easy? Formal and Experimental Perspectives
Lazaridou‐Chatzigoga, D., Katsos, N., & Stockall, L. (2015) · Ratio · doi:10.1111/rati.12116 · Cited by 51
Carving Up the Social World with Generics
Leslie, S. (2014) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198718765.003.0009 · Cited by 55
Self-citationSterken, R. (2017) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12431 · Cited by 48
Brasoveanu, A., & Dotlačil, J. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.3 · Cited by 47
Brandone, A. C., Gelman, S. A., & Hedglen, J. (2014) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12176 · Cited by 45
Self-citationEssays on Speech Acts and Other Topics in Pragmatics
Sbisà, M. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192844125.001.0001 · Cited by 41
Memory Errors Reveal a Bias to Spontaneously Generalize to Categories
Sutherland, S. L., Cimpian, A., Leslie, S., & Gelman, S. A. (2014) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12189 · Cited by 42
Self-citationCarruthers, P. (2017) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-017-0354-3 · Cited by 43
The development of principled connections and kind representations
Haward, P., Wagner, L., Carey, S. E., & Prasada, S. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.001 · Cited by 42
The effect of generic statements on children's causal attributions: Questions of mechanism.
Cimpian, A., & Erickson, L. C. (2011) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025274 · Cited by 39
The Mind on Paper: Reading, Consciousness and Rationality
Olson, D. R. (2016) · Cited by 37
Language Loss and Illocutionary Silencing
Nowak, E. (2019) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/fzz051 · Cited by 36
Basic Conditional Reasoning: How Children Mimic Counterfactual Reasoning
Leahy, B., Rafetseder, E., & Perner, J. (2013) · Studia Logica · doi:10.1007/s11225-013-9510-7 · Cited by 34
CONCEPTS, ANALYSIS, GENERICS AND THE CANBERRA PLAN1
Johnston, M., & Leslie, S. (2012) · Philosophical Perspectives · doi:10.1111/phpe.12015 · Cited by 32
Self-citationSpeaking of Kinds: How Correcting Generic Statements can Shape Children's Concepts
Foster-Hanson, E., Leslie, S., & Rhodes, M. (2022) · Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1111/cogs.13223 · Cited by 21
Self-citationConstraint-Based Pragmatic Processing
Degen, J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.8 · Cited by 31
Words Matter: Meaning and Power
McConnell‐Ginet, S. (2020) · Cited by 29
Children's interpretations of general quantifiers, specific quantifiers and generics
Gelman, S. A., Leslie, S., Was, A. M., & Koch, C. M. (2014) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2014.931591 · Cited by 28
Self-citationTell me about Pangolins! Evidence that children are motivated to learn about kinds.
Cimpian, A., & Park, J. J. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0031687 · Cited by 28
Breheny, R. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.4 · Cited by 26
“You” and “I” in a foreign land: The persuasive force of generic-you
Orvell, A., Kross, E. F., & Gelman, S. A. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103869 · Cited by 25
Self-citationAsymmetry Effects in Generic and Quantified GeneralizationsPreprint
Reuter, K., Neufeld, E., & Pinal, G. D. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/chbkq · Cited by 24
Legal Decision-Making and the Abstract/Concrete Paradox
Struchiner, N., de Almeida, G. D. F. C. F., & Hannikainen, I. R. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104421 · Cited by 23
How Diagrams Can Support Syllogistic Reasoning: An Experimental Study
Sato, Y., & Mineshima, K. (2015) · Journal of Logic Language and Information · doi:10.1007/s10849-015-9225-4 · Cited by 24
Lerner, A. J., & Leslie, S. (2013) · Philosophical Perspectives · doi:10.1111/phpe.12034 · Cited by 18
Self-citationDo Children Recall Numbers as Generic? A Strong Test of the Generics-As-Default Hypothesis
Gelman, S. A., Leslie, S., Gelman, R., & Leslie, A. M. (2019) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2019.1571418 · Cited by 17
Self-citationInductive generalization relies on category representations
Sutherland, S. L., & Cimpian, A. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0951-z · Cited by 18
Cognitive Psychology and the Metaphysics of Meaning
Johnston, M., & Leslie, S. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190639679.003.0008 · Cited by 17
Self-citationHoicka, E., Saul, J. M., Prouten, E., Whitehead, L., & Sterken, R. (2021) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13051 · Cited by 19
The Privileged Status of Category Representations in Early Development
Cimpian, A. (2016) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/cdep.12166 · Cited by 17
How generic language shapes the development of social thought
Rhodes, M., Gelman, S. A., & Leslie, S. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.09.012 · Cited by 18
Self-citationGenerically partisan: Polarization in political communication
Novoa, G., Echelbarger, M., Gelman, A., & Gelman, S. A. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2309361120 · Cited by 18
Self-citationPointing As a Socio-Pragmatic Cue to Particular vs. Generic Reference
Meyer, M. A., & Baldwin, D. A. (2013) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2013.753802 · Cited by 15
The Formal Structure of Kind Representations
Haward, P., Carey, S. E., & Prasada, S. (2021) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13040 · Cited by 15
Davies, C. E., & Arnold, J. E. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.6 · Cited by 15
Commemoration and Constriction
Lim, C. (2024) · The Journal of Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10892-024-09503-7 · Cited by 13
Sutherland, S. L., & Cimpian, A. (2015) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0039463 · Cited by 14
Cimpian, A., & Petro, G. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.01.008 · Cited by 13
Tian, Y., & Breheny, R. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.29 · Cited by 13
Generics, race, and social perspectives
O'Donnell, P. A. (2017) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/00207543.2016.1266801 · Cited by 12
Presuppositions, Projection, and Accommodation
Schwarz, F. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.26 · Cited by 11
Two Conceptions of Rationality in Grice’s Theory of Implicature
Sbisà, M. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192844125.003.0010 · Cited by 10
Generics and Experimental Philosophy
Lerner, A. J., & Leslie, S. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118661666.ch28 · Cited by 10
Self-citationOnea, E. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.17 · Cited by 9
Lazaridou‐Chatzigoga, D. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.12 · Cited by 9
Allaway, E., Bhagavatula, C., Hwang, J. D., McKeown, K. R., & Leslie, S. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00530 · Cited by 9
Self-citationGenerics about categories and generics about individuals: Same phenomenon or different?
Bian, L., & Cimpian, A. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0001100 · Cited by 8
Korman, J., & Khemlani, S. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104157 · Cited by 8
Generics and Quantified Generalizations: Asymmetry Effects and Strategic Communicators
Reuter, K., Neufeld, E., & Pinal, G. D. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106004 · Cited by 6
What the Study of Psychological Essentialism May Reveal about the Natural World
Gelman, S. A. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190639679.003.0013 · Cited by 5
Self-citationJuanchich, M., Sirota, M., & Bonnefon, J. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.2 · Cited by 6
Schumacher, P. B. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.25 · Cited by 7
Castroviejo, E., Hernández‐Conde, J. V., Lazaridou‐Chatzigoga, D., Ponciano, M., & Vicente, A. (2022) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2022.2071715 · Cited by 6
Rubio‐Fernández, P. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.23 · Cited by 6
Do all storks fly to Africa? Universal statements and the generic overgeneralization effect
Karczewski, D., Wajda, E., & Poniat, R. (2020) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102855 · Cited by 6
Tieu, L., & Romoli, J. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.22 · Cited by 5
Genericity as a Unitary Psychological Phenomenon: An Argument from Linguistic Diversity
Collins, J. M. (2015) · Ratio · doi:10.1111/rati.12102 · Cited by 5
The social (and cultural, and syntactic, and semantic) life of generics
Mannheim, B. (2021) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404521000336 · Cited by 5
Syrett, K. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.14 · Cited by 5
The Form Composition Hypothesis: When concepts combine, their central forms are privilegedPreprint
Haward, P. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/nv6sk · Cited by 6
Ngamcharoen, P., Sakdapat, N., & Bhanthumnavin, D. E. (2025) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.158619.1 · Cited by 4
Orvell, A., Elli, G. V., Umscheid, V. A., Simmons, E., Kross, E. F., & Gelman, S. A. (2022) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13846 · Cited by 5
Self-citationGiving Generic Language Another Thought
Neufeld, E., Bosse, A., Pinal, G. D., & Sterken, R. (2025) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.70000 · Cited by 7
Language Comprehension, Inference, and Alternatives
Skordos, D., & Barner, D. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.1 · Cited by 4
Brooks, P. J., & Parshina, O. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.5 · Cited by 4
Kirkpatrick, J. R. (2024) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12499 · Cited by 4
Children’s generic interpretation of pretense
Baer, C., & Friedman, O. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.05.004 · Cited by 4
Brunetti, M., Matteo, R. D., Aureli, T., Garito, M. C., & Casadio, C. (2020) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-020-00995-3 · Cited by 4
Tonhauser, J. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.30 · Cited by 5
Finiasz, Z., Gelman, S. A., & Kushnir, T. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105707 · Cited by 7
Self-citationGenericity and Inductive Inference
Schiller, H. I. (2022) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1017/psa.2022.94 · Cited by 3
Holtgraves, T. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.32 · Cited by 3
Grigoroglou, M., & Anna Papafragou, A. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.18 · Cited by 3
Pouscoulous, N., & Dulcinati, G. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.19 · Cited by 3
Rohde, H. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.21 · Cited by 2
Sbisà, M. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192844125.003.0011 · Cited by 2
Uptake and Conventionality in Illocution
Sbisà, M. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192844125.003.0012 · Cited by 2
Differentiation and Generic Sentences
Rothermund, P., & Deutsch, R. (2025) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.70057 · Cited by 2
de Ruiter, J. P. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.7 · Cited by 2
Ferguson, H. J. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.9 · Cited by 2
Spotorno, N., & Noveck, I. A. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.16 · Cited by 2
Frequency and Informativeness of Gestural Cues Accompanying Generic and Particular Reference
Meyer, M. A., Gelman, S. A., & Stilwell, S. M. (2014) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2014.940792 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Leslie, S.-J., & Gelman, S. A.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Leslie, Sarah-Jane
- Venue
- Cognitive Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 186-214
- ISSN
- 0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3267382
- OpenAlex
- W2146729151
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 9.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-36043, R56HD036043, R01HD036043)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- generics, quantified statements, memory retrieval, cognitive development, preschool children, adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Concept Formation, Generalization, Psychological, Humans, Psychological Tests, Mental Recall, Semantics, Evidence-Based Medicine, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
