Cited by 84Categorization, perception, and languageSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

What a Loaded Generalization: Generics and Social Cognition

Open access
Wodak, Daniel, Leslie, Sarah‐Jane, Rhodes, Marjorie·2015·Philosophy Compass

Abstract

This paper explores the role of generics in social cognition. First, we explore the nature and effects of the most common form of generics about social kinds (descriptive generics). Second, we discuss the nature and effects of a less common but equally important form of generics about social kinds (normative generics). Finally, we consider the implications of this discussion for how we ought to use language about the social world.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/phc3.12250

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Generics may imply that a statement is normatively correct or ideal.

    “Generics may also imply that a statement is normatively correct or ideal (39,40,42,43).”

    From Generic language in scientific communication (2019) · cites this paper as [43]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Allport, G. The Nature of Prejudice . Addison Wesley, 1954.
  2. Gelman S. A . The Essential Child : Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought , Oxford University Press, 2003.
  3. Gil-White, F. ' Are ethnic groups biological ' species ' to the human brain? ' Current Anthropology 42 (2001): 515 -554.
  4. --. ' Generics . ' In G. Russell and D. G. Fara (eds.), Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Language Routledge (2012): 355 -367
  5. Leslie, S.J. and Gelman S.A. ' Quanti fi ed statements are recalled as generics. ' Cognitive Psychology 64 (2012): 186 -214.
  6. Rothbart, M. and Taylor M. ' Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? ' In G.R. Semin and K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, Interaction and Social Cognition, Sage, 1992: 11 -36.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wodak, D., Leslie, S., & Rhodes, M.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Wodak, Daniel
Venue
Philosophy Compass
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-09
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
625-635
ISSN
1747-9991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1791539911
Cited by
84
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophy Compass (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (BCS-1226942)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Keywords
generics, social cognition, social kinds, generalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review