Cited by 225Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMultisensory perception and integrationMotor Control and Adaptation

Beyond sensory substitution—learning the sixth sense

Nagel, Saskia K, Carl, Christine, Kringe, Tobias, Märtin, Robert, König, Peter·2005·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

Rapid advances in neuroscience have sparked numerous efforts to study the neural correlate of consciousness. Prominent subjects include higher sensory area, distributed assemblies bound by synchronization of neuronal activity and neurons in specific cortical laminae. In contrast, it has been suggested that the quality of sensory awareness is determined by systematic change of afferent signals resulting from behaviour and knowledge thereof. Support for such skill-based theories of perception is provided by experiments on sensory substitution. Here, we pursue this line of thought and create new sensorimotor contingencies and, hence, a new quality of perception. Adult subjects received orientation information, obtained by a magnetic compass, via vibrotactile stimulation around the waist. After six weeks of training we evaluated integration of the new input by a battery of tests. The results indicate that the sensory information provided by the belt (1) is processed and boosts performance, (2) if inconsistent with other sensory signals leads to variable performance, (3) does interact with the vestibular nystagmus and (4) in half of the experimental subjects leads to qualitative changes of sensory experience. These data support the hypothesis that new sensorimotor contingencies can be learned and integrated into behaviour and affect perceptual experience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2560/2/4/r02

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A demonstration of the integration of new sensory information (magnetic north) that is co-determined by own movements (yaw-turns) is given by the feelSpace project.

    “A demonstration of the integration of new sensory information (magnetic north) that is co-determined by own movements (yaw-turns) is given by the feelSpace project (Kärcher et al. 2012; Nagel et al. 2005).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nagel, S. K., Carl, C., Kringe, T., Märtin, R., & König, P.
Affiliations
Osnabrück University (DE)
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2005-11-29
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
R13-R26
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W1997901895
Cited by
225
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
sensory substitution, sensorimotor contingencies, vibrotactile stimulation, magnetic compass orientation, perceptual learning, vestibular nystagmus, multisensory integration, neural correlates of consciousness, afferent signals
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Humans, Learning, Magnetics, Middle Aged, Orientation, Psychomotor Performance, Sensation, Touch, Vibration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review