Cited by 191Embodied and Extended CognitionCybernetics and Technology in SocietyDigital Media and Philosophy

Dimensions of integration in embedded and extended cognitive systems

Open access
Heersmink, Richard·2015·Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11097-014-9355-1

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The way in which humans and artefacts successfully integrate into wider, cognitive systems is a matter of degree and is best seen as a multidimensional phenomenon.

    “Here, we agree with Heersmink's view on extended cognitive systems (Heersmink, 2015), 28which states that the way in which humans and artefacts successfully integrate into wider, cognitive systems is a matter of degree and is best seen as a multidimensional phenomenon in which the appropriation of the artefact by the human agent varies along several not hierarchical, intrinsic to the”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body and world back together again. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  2. Haugeland, J. (1998). Mind embodied and embedded. In Having thought: Essays in the metaphysics of mind (pp. 207-237). Harvard University Press.
  3. In J. M. Bishop & Y. J. Erden (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th AISB Symposium on Computing and Philosophy (pp. 54-61).
  4. Loader, P. (2012). The epistemic/pragmatic distinction. Philosophical Explorations, 15(2), 219-232.
  5. Nersessian, N. J. (2005). Interpreting scientific and engineering practices: Integrating the cognitive, social, and cultural dimensions. In M. Gorman, R. Tweney, D. Gooding, & A. Kincannon (Eds.), New directions in scientific and technical thinking (pp. 17-56). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
  6. Pierce, C. S. (1935). The collected papers of Charles S. Pierce vol 2. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  7. Smart, P. (2012). The web-extended mind. Metaphilosophy, 43(4), 446-463.
  8. Sutton, J. (2009a). The feel of the world: Exograms, habits, and the confusion of types of memory. In A. Kania (Ed.), Philosophers on memento (pp. 65-86). London: Routledge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heersmink, R.
Affiliations
ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders (AU)
Corresponding author
Heersmink, Richard
Venue
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
Published
2014-03-01
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
577-598
ISSN
  • 1568-7759 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8676
OpenAlex
W2155660451
Cited by
191
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
Keywords
cognitive extension, embedded cognition, extended cognition, human-technology integration, cognitive artifacts, multidimensional framework, information flow, reliability, trust, procedural transparency, information transparency, individualization, transformation, situated cognition, system coupling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review