The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Team situation awareness within the context of human-autonomy teaming
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The CERTT-UAS-STE (Cooke & Shope, 2004) was a testbed used in 18 articles in our search (e.g., Demir, et al., 2016; Demir, Cooke, et al., 2018; Demir, Likens et al., 2018, Demir, McNeese, et al. 2018; McNeese et al., 2018).”
From Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2022) · cites this paper as Demir, et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“(I) The quality of communication is associated with stronger team functioning.”
From Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2022) · cites this paper as Demir et al. (2016)
In the citing paper
“(I) Human–human teams generally had better outcomes than did HATs”
From Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2022) · cites this paper as Demir et al. (2016)
In the citing paper
“Communication that involved pushing behaviors (e.g., anticipating others’ informational needs) was associated with stronger team situation awareness and performance (Demir et al., 2016).”
From Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2022) · cites this paper as Demir et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“human–human teams almost always outperformed HATs (e.g., Cooke et al., 2016; Demir et al., 2016; McNeese et al., 2018; Myers et al., 2019).”
From Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2022) · cites this paper as Demir et al., 2016
1 more claim about this paper
Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis
Wickham, H. (2009) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3 · Cited by 14,447
Twelve frequently asked questions about growth curve modeling
Curran, P. J., Obeidat, K., & Losardo, D. (2010) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248371003699969 · Cited by 1,246
Ten challenges for making automation a ‘team player’ in joint human-agent activity
Klein, G., Woods, D. D., Bradshaw, J. M., Hoffman, R. R., & Feltovich, P. J. (2004) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2004.74 · Cited by 590
Cooke, N. J., Gorman, J. C., Myers, C. W., & Duran, J. L. (2013) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12009 · Cited by 522
Self-citationTeaming With a Synthetic Teammate: Insights into Human-Autonomy Teaming
McNeese, N. J., Demir, M., Cooke, N. J., & Myers, C. (2018) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720817743223 · Cited by 380
Self-citationVagia, M., Transeth, A. A., & Fjerdingen, S. A. (2016) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.09.013 · Cited by 299
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Ball, 2010, The synthetic teammate project, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 16, 271, 10.1007/s10588-010-9065-3 · DOI
- Cillessen, 2006, Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: A growth curve modelling analysis, Journal of Adolescence, 29, 935, 10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.05.005 · DOI
- Cooke, 2009, Interaction-based measures of cognitive systems, Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 3, 27, 10.1518/155534309X433302 · DOI
- Cooke, 2007, Team cognition in experienced command-and-control teams, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 146
- Cooke, 2000, Measuring team knowledge, Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 42, 151, 10.1518/001872000779656561 · DOI · Paper page
- Demir, 2015, Human teaming changes driven by expectations of a synthetic teammate, Vol. 58(1), 16
- Demir, 2015, Synthetic teammate communication and coordination with humans, Vol. 59(1), 951
- Demir, 2015, The synthetic teammate as a team player in command-and-control teams, Vol. 60(1), 116
- Endsley, 2015, Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement, Vol. 32(2), 97
- Endsley, 2000, Situation awareness in aircraft maintenance teams, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 26, 301, 10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00073-6 · DOI
- Gorman, 2010, Team coordination dynamics, Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 14, 265
- Gorman, 2015, Changes in team composition after a break: building adapative command-and-control teams, Vol. 50(3), 487
- Gorman, 2006, Measuring team situation awareness in decentralized command and control environments, Ergonomics, 49, 1312, 10.1080/00140130600612788 · DOI · Paper page
- Schooley, 1993, High-autonomy control of space resource processing plants, IEEE Control Systems, 13, 29, 10.1109/37.214942 · doi:10.1109/37.214942
Cited by
Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research
Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0057 · Cited by 2,921
Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature
O’Neill, T., McNeese, N., Barron, A., & Schelble, B. (2022) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720820960865 · Cited by 695
Self-citationTowards a Theory of Longitudinal Trust Calibration in Human–Robot Teams
de Visser, E. J., Peeters, M. M. M., Jung, M. F., Kohn, S., Shaw, T. H., Pak, R., & Neerincx, M. A. (2020) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-019-00596-x · Cited by 447
Teaming With a Synthetic Teammate: Insights into Human-Autonomy Teaming
McNeese, N. J., Demir, M., Cooke, N. J., & Myers, C. (2018) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720817743223 · Cited by 380
Self-citationXu, W., Dainoff, M. J., Ge, L., & Gao, Z. (2023) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2041900 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Demir, M., McNeese, N. J., & Cooke, N. J.
- Venue
- Cognitive Systems Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 46
- Pages
- 3-12
- ISSN
- 1389-0417
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Funders
- Office of Naval Research Award – ‘United States (N00014111084446)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
