The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Twitter sentiment analysis with a deep neural network: An enhanced approach using user behavioral information
Abstract
Abstract Sentiment analysis on social media such as Twitter has become a very important and challenging task. Due to the characteristics of such data—tweet length, spelling errors, abbreviations, and special characters—the sentiment analysis task in such an environment requires a non-traditional approach. Moreover, social media sentiment analysis is a fundamental problem with many interesting applications. Most current social media sentiment classification methods judge the sentiment polarity primarily according to textual content and neglect other information on these platforms. In this paper, we propose a neural network model that also incorporates user behavioral information within a given document (tweet). The neural network used in this paper is a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The system is evaluated on two datasets provided by the SemEval-2016 Workshop. The proposed model outperforms current baseline models (including Naive Bayes and Support Vector Machines), which shows that going beyond the content of a document (tweet) is beneficial in sentiment classification, because it provides the classifier with a deep understanding of the task.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quinlan, J. R. (1986) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116251 · Cited by 21,439
VADER: a parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text
Hutto, C., & Gilbert, E. (2014) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14550 · Cited by 6,087
Sentiment strength detection in short informal text
Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G., Cai, D., & Kappas, A. (2010) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21416 · Cited by 1,449
Learning Sentiment-Specific Word Embedding for Twitter Sentiment Classification
Tang, D., Wei, F., Yang, N., Zhou, M., Liu, T., & Qin, B. (2014) · Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-1146 · Cited by 1,181
Sentiment analysis on tweets for social events
Zhou, X., Tao, X., Yong, J., & Yang, Z. (2013) · Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 17th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) · doi:10.1109/cscwd.2013.6581022 · Cited by 124
Cited by
Sentiment Analysis Based on Deep Learning: A Comparative Study
Dang, N. C., Moreno-García, M. N., & De la Prieta, F. (2020) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics9030483 · Cited by 593
Pimpalkar, A., & Raj R, J. R. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117581 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Alharbi, A. S. M., & de Doncker, E.
- Venue
- Cognitive Systems Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 54
- Pages
- 50-61
- ISSN
- 1389-0417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2900946789
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Twitter sentiment analysis with a deep neural network: An enhanced approach using user behavioral information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.10.001
- The paper
- Alharbi, A. S. M., & de Doncker, E. (2019). Twitter sentiment analysis with a deep neural network: An enhanced approach using user behavioral information. Cognitive Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.10.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.