VADER: a parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text
Open accessAbstract
The inherent nature of social media content poses serious challenges to practical applications of sentiment analysis. We present VADER, a simple rule-based model for general sentiment analysis, and compare its effectiveness to eleven typical state-of-practice benchmarks including LIWC, ANEW, the General Inquirer, SentiWordNet, and machine learning oriented techniques relying on Naive Bayes, Maximum Entropy, and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms. Using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, we first construct and empirically validate a gold-standard list of lexical features (along with their associated sentiment intensity measures) which are specifically attuned to sentiment in microblog-like contexts. We then combine these lexical features with consideration for five general rules that embody grammatical and syntactical conventions for expressing and emphasizing sentiment intensity. Interestingly, using our parsimonious rule-based model to assess the sentiment of tweets, we find that VADER outperforms individual human raters (F1 Classification Accuracy = 0.96 and 0.84, respectively), and generalizes more favorably across contexts than any of our benchmarks.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
VADER (Hutto and Gilbert, 2014) delivered the best results in the multi-class classification case.
“However, the VADER (Hutto and Gilbert, 2014) delivered the best results in the multi-class classification case.”
From Sentiment Analysis in Tourism: Capitalizing on Big Data (2019) · cites this paper as Hutto and Gilbert, 2014
The Introduction and Results report strong three-class classification performance on tweets: VADER achieved F1 = 0.96, above individual human raters’ F1 = 0.84. But the Results say VADER performed “as well or better” than machine-learning approaches in three of four domain comparisons, not that it delivered the best multiclass results across the board. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAdditional consistency checks were performed using the VADER lexicon, providing further assurance against algorithmic biases and misclassifications.
“Additional consistency checks were performed using the established VADER lexicon (Hutto & Gilbert, 2014), providing further assurance against algorithmic biases and misclassifications.”
From Generative AI in Design Thinking Pedagogy: Enhancing Creativity, Critical Thinking, and Ethical Reasoning in Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as Hutto & Gilbert, 2014
VADER is a rule-based sentiment analysis tool validated for social media text.
“Comment-level sentiment is measured using VADER (Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner) [14], a rule-based sentiment analysis tool validated for social media text.”
From OpenClaw AI Agents as Informal Learners at Moltbook: Characterizing an Emergent Learning Community at Scale (2026) · cites this paper as [14]
VADER is rule-based and deterministic: the same text always produces the same score.
“VADER is chosen for its rule-based, deterministic character: the same text always produces the same score.”
From DMF: A Deterministic Memory Framework for Conversational AI Agents (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
Emotional valences measured with tools such as LIWC, VADER, LabMT, or NRC emotion lexicon were often associated with PTSD symptoms or severity.
“Emotional valences, measured with tools such as the LIWC, VADER 51 LabMT, or NRC emotion lexicon were often associated with PTSD symptoms or severity.”
From Linguistic markers for identifying post-traumatic stress disorder and associated symptoms: a systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as [51]
VADER is a method that has provided promising results on Twitter data.
“Valence Aware Dictionary for Sentiment Reasoning (VADER) is a method that has provided promising results on Twitter data (Hutto & Gilbert, 2014).”
From Sentiment Analysis in Tourism: Capitalizing on Big Data (2019) · cites this paper as Hutto & Gilbert, 2014
The VADER sentiment lexicon is composed of more than 7,000 items, along with their associated sentiment intensity measures, validated by humans and specifically adapted to sentiment in microblog-like contexts, such as Twitter.
“The VADER sentiment lexicon is composed of more than 7,000 items, along with their associated sentiment intensity measures, validated by humans and specifically adapted to sentiment in microblog-like contexts, such as Twitter (Hutto & Gilbert, 2014).”
From Sentiment Analysis in Tourism: Capitalizing on Big Data (2019) · cites this paper as Hutto & Gilbert, 2014
Robustness checks with other sentiment classification tools show broad agreement with the RoBERTa results.
“We also conducted robustness checks with other sentiment classification tools95–98, which show broad agreement with the RoBERTa results (Supplementary Sections 5 and 6).”
From Generative language models exhibit social identity biases (2024) · cites this paper as [95]
Responses to the open-ended question skew positive, with most students expressing net-positive sentiment about AI's effect on learning and a minority expressing negative sentiment.
“Responses skew positive, with most students expressing net-positive sentiment about AI's effect on learning and a minority expressing negative sentiment.”
From Experimental Evidence on the Learning Impact of Generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Hutto and Gilbert, 2014
Section 3.2 analyzes positive and negative tweets, and Section 4 evaluates VADER’s sentiment classification. Neither reports open-ended responses from students or their views on AI’s effect on learning. Searches for student responses and AI in learning found no relevant passage. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredStudents who express more positive views about AI's effect on learning use AI somewhat more for academic work during the semester (β = 0.107, p = 0.096).
“Panel B shows that students who express more positive views about AI's effect on learning use AI somewhat more for academic work during the semester ( ˆ β = 0 . 107, p = 0 . 096).”
From Experimental Evidence on the Learning Impact of Generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Hutto and Gilbert, 2014
Sections 3.3 and 4 examine sentiment ratings of tweets and VADER’s classification performance, not students’ views of AI or their academic AI use. Searches for the student-use claim and for β = 0.107, p = 0.096 found no passage addressing that relationship. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredA regression of AI use on sentiment yields a positive but statistically insignificant coefficient (β = 0.041, p = 0.647).
“A regression of AI use on the sentiment score yields a positive but statistically insignificant coefficient ( ˆ β = 0 . 041, p = 0 . 647).”
From Experimental Evidence on the Learning Impact of Generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Hutto and Gilbert, 2014
The Results section reports VADER’s sentiment-classification accuracy and correlations with human ratings, not a regression of AI use on sentiment. Searches for the stated regression and its coefficients found no passage reporting β = 0.041 or p = 0.647. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSentiment about AI's effect on learning is weakly related to both measures of AI use.
“Sentiment is weakly related to both measures.”
From Experimental Evidence on the Learning Impact of Generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Hutto and Gilbert, 2014
The Results section examines how VADER’s sentiment scores correlate with human sentiment ratings, not with measures of AI use. Searches for sentiment about AI’s effect on learning and its relationship to AI use found no passage addressing the claimed weak relationships. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Basics of Qualitative Research
Ozanne, J. L., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172751 · Cited by 17,852 · see citing works
Kilgarriff, A. (2000) · Language · doi:10.2307/417141 · Cited by 11,595 · see citing works
(1990) · Cited by 11,110 · see citing works
Mining and summarizing customer reviews
Hu, M., & Liu, B. (2004) · Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1014052.1014073 · Cited by 7,793 · see citing works
Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781601981516 · Cited by 6,957 · see citing works
Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank
Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J., Chuang, J., Manning, C. D., Ng, A., & Potts, C. (2013) · Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d13-1170 · Cited by 6,878 · see citing works
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Liu, B. (2012) · Synthesis lectures on human language technologies · doi:10.2200/s00416ed1v01y201204hlt016 · Cited by 3,837 · see citing works
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2004) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1218955.1218990 · Cited by 3,317 · see citing works
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Zhang, L., & Liu, B. (2017) · Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7687-1_907 · Cited by 3,299 · see citing works
Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P., & Welpe, I. M. (2010) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14009 · Cited by 2,647 · see citing works
Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC)
Chung, C. K., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-741-8.ch012 · Cited by 2,152 · see citing works
Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk
Kittur, A., Ed, H., & Suh, B. (2008) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1357054.1357127 · Cited by 1,941 · see citing works
Cheap and fast---but is it good?: evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks
Snow, R., O'Connor, B., Jurafsky, D., & Ng, A. Y. (2008) · Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - EMNLP '08 · doi:10.3115/1613715.1613751 · Cited by 1,887 · see citing works
Sentiment Analysis and Subjectivity
Bing, L. (2010) · Cited by 1,724 · see citing works
The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015
Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015) · University of Texas at Austin · doi:10.15781/t25p41 · Cited by 1,674 · see citing works
Liu, B., Hu, M., & Cheng, J. (2005) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/1060745.1060797 · Cited by 1,612 · see citing works
Predicting Depression via Social Media
Choudhury, M. D., Gamon, M., Counts, S., & Horvitz, E. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v7i1.14432 · Cited by 1,583 · see citing works
Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Data
Agarwal, A., Xie, B., Vovsha, I., Rambow, O., & Passonneau, R. J. (2011) · Cited by 1,565 · see citing works
Measuring praise and criticism
Turney, P. D., & Littman, M. L. (2003) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/944012.944013 · Cited by 1,515 · see citing works
(1999) · Cited by 1,435 · see citing works
A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining
Ding, X., Liu, B., & Yu, P. S. (2008) · doi:10.1145/1341531.1341561 · Cited by 1,398 · see citing works
WordNet an electronic lexical database
Fellbaum, C. (n.d.) · Cited by 771 · see citing works
A new ANEW: Evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogsPreprint
Nielsen, F. Å. (2011) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1103.2903 · Cited by 733 · see citing works
Enhanced Sentiment Learning Using Twitter Hashtags and Smileys
Davidov, D., Tsur, O., & Rappoport, A. (2010) · Cited by 698 · see citing works
Using WordNet to Measure Semantic Orientations of Adjectives
Kamps, J., Marx, M., Mokken, R. J., & de Rijke, M. (2004) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/222z3zcs9izx · Cited by 654 · see citing works
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Zhang, L., & Liu, B. (2016) · Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7502-7_907-1 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
A System for Real-time Twitter Sentiment Analysis of 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Cycle
Wang, H., Can, D., Kazemzadeh, A., Bar, F., & Narayanan, S. S. (2012) · Cited by 542 · see citing works
Predicting postpartum changes in emotion and behavior via social media
de Choudhury, M., Counts, S., & Horvitz, E. (2013) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2466447 · Cited by 474 · see citing works
Just how mad are you? finding strong and weak opinion clauses
Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., & Hwa, R. (2004) · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Are your participants gaming the system?
Downs, J. S., Holbrook, M. B., Sheng, S., & Cranor, L. F. (2010) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1753326.1753688 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Determining the semantic orientation of terms through gloss classification
Esuli, A., & Sebastiani, F. (2005) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/1099554.1099713 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Expressing emotion in text-based communication
Hancock, J. T., Landrigan, C., & Silver, C. (2007) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1240624.1240764 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
SenticNet: A Publicly Available Semantic Resource for Opinion Mining
Cambria, E., Speer, R. E., Havasi, C., & Hussain, A. (2010) · Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Automatic construction of a context-aware sentiment lexicon
Lu, Y., Castellanos, M., Umeshwar Dayal, B., & Zhai, C. (2011) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/1963405.1963456 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
An unobtrusive behavioral model of "gross national happiness"
Kramer, A. D. I. (2010) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1753326.1753369 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Smedt, T. D., & Daelemans, W. M. P. (2012) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/2188385.2343710 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Bates, W. (2009) · Asian-Pacific Economic Literature · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8411.2009.01235.x · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Subjectivity word sense disambiguation
Akkaya, C., Wiebe, J., & Mihalcea, R. F. (2009) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/1699510.1699535 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Sentiment Analysis on Twitter Data
Kumar, A., Suhas, M., & Fedrich, N. (2022) · Cognitive science and technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-2350-0_43 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
A longitudinal study of follow predictors on twitter
Hutto, C. J., Yardi, S., & Gilbert, É. (2013) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2470771 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Self-citationSentiment Extraction: Integrating Statistical Parsing, Semantic Analysis, and Common Sense Reasoning
Shastri, L., Parvathy, A. G., Kumar, A., Wesley, J. R., & Balakrishnan, R. (2010) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v24i2.18824 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- [3]3. Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., & Sebastiani, F. (2010). SentiWordNet 3.0. In Proc. of LREC-10.
- [5]5. Cambria, E., Havasi, C., & Hussain, A. (2012). SenticNet 2. In Proc. AAAI IFAI RSC-12.
- [6]6. Cambria, E., Speer, R., Havasi, C., & Hussain, A. (2010). SenticNet. In Proc. of AAAI SCK-10.
- [18]18. Kamps, J., Mokken, R. J., Marx, M., & de Rijke, M. (2004). Us- ing WordNet to measure semantic orientation. In Proc. LREC-04.
- [31]31. Snow, R., O'Connor, B., Jurafsky, D., & Ng, A. Y. (2008). Cheap and Fast -But is it Good?. In Proc. EMNLP-08.
- [33]33. Stone, P. J., Dunphy, D. C., Smith, M. S., & Ogilvie, D. M. (1966). General Inquirer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- [34]34. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Re- search. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- [36]36. Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. (2010). Predicting Elections with Twitter:. In Proc. ICWSM-10.
- [38]38. Wang, H., Can, D., Kazemzadeh, A., Bar, F., & Narayanan, S. (2012). A system…real-time Twitter sentiment analysis. ACL-12.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language
Davidson, T., Warmsley, D., Macy, M., & Weber, I. (2017) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14955 · Cited by 2,610 · see citing works
Shu, K., Mahudeswaran, D., Wang, S., Lee, D., & Liu, H. (2018) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2020.0062 · Cited by 1,362 · see citing works
A review on sentiment analysis and emotion detection from text
Nandwani, P., & Verma, R. (2021) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-021-00776-6 · Cited by 869 · see citing works
Uniting the Tribes: Using Text for Marketing Insight
Berger, J., Humphreys, A., Ludwig, S., Moe, W. W., Netzer, O., & Schweidel, D. A. (2020) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242919873106 · Cited by 742 · see citing works
Transformer models for text-based emotion detection: a review of BERT-based approaches
Acheampong, F. A., Nunoo‐Mensah, H., & Chen, W. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-021-09958-2 · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Sentiment Analysis in Tourism: Capitalizing on Big Data
Alaei, A. R., Becken, S., & Stantic, B. (2019) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287517747753 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
A survey of multimodal sentiment analysis
Soleymani, M., García, D., Jou, B., Schuller, B. W., Chang, S., & Pantić, M. (2017) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2017.08.003 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
Automated Text Analysis for Consumer Research
Humphreys, A., & Wang, R. J.-H. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx104 · Cited by 636 · see citing works
Edge Weight Prediction in Weighted Signed Networks
Kumar, S., Spezzano, F., Subrahmanian, V. S., & Faloutsos, C. (2016) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2016.0033 · Cited by 542 · see citing works
Measuring Emotional Contagion in Social Media
Ferrara, E., & Yang, Z. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142390 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code
Rozière, B., Gehring, J., Gloeckle, F., Sootla, S., Gat, I., Tan, X. E., Adi, Y., Liu, J., Sauvestre, R., Remez, T., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.12950 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
“The VADER produces sentiment scores between -1 and 1, where a positive (negative) score indicates a positive (negative) sentiment towards the population mentioned in the prompt.”
MethodCheng, J., Bernstein, M. S., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., & Leskovec, J. (2017) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2998181.2998213 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Natural language processing applied to mental illness detection: a narrative review
Zhang, T., Schoene, A. M., Ji, S., & Ananiadou, S. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00589-7 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods
Ribeiro, F. N., Araújo, M., Gonçalves, P., André Gonçalves, M., & Benevenuto, F. (2016) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0085-1 · Cited by 468 · see citing works
Shapiro, A. H., Sudhof, M., & Wilson, D. J. (2020) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.07.053 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
SenticNet 6: Ensemble Application of Symbolic and Subsymbolic AI for Sentiment Analysis
Cambria, E., Li, Y., Xing, F., Poria, S., & Kwok, K. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3340531.3412003 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Social media big data analytics: A survey
Ghani, N. B. A., Hamid, S. B., Hashem, M., & Ahmed, E. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.039 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generation
Sheng, E., Chang, K.-W., Natarajan, P., & Peng, N. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1339 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
“Moreover, we calculate Spearman’s correlation between 1) sentiment annotations and regard an-6 notations, 2) VADER predictions and sentiment annotations, and 3) VADER predictions and regard annotations in Table 5.”
MethodInfluentialSerial Crowdfunding, Social Capital, and Project Success
Butticè, V., Colombo, M., & Wright, M. (2017) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12271 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Cryptocurrency trading: a comprehensive survey
Fang, F., Ventre, C., Basios, M., Kanthan, L., Martínez‐Rego, D., Wu, F., & Li, L. (2022) · Financial Innovation · doi:10.1186/s40854-021-00321-6 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
The predictive power of public Twitter sentiment for forecasting cryptocurrency prices
Kraaijeveld, O., & Smedt, J. D. (2020) · Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money · doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2020.101188 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Comparing automated text classification methods
Hartmann, J., Huppertz, J., Schamp, C., & Heitmann, M. (2019) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.09.009 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
More than a Feeling: Accuracy and Application of Sentiment Analysis
Hartmann, J., Heitmann, M., Siebert, C., & Schamp, C. (2023) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.05.005 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Mohammad, S. M. (2016) · Emotion Measurement · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100508-8.00009-6 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Zampieri, M., Nakov, P., Rosenthal, S., Atanasova, P., Karadzhov, G., Mubarak, H., Derczynski, L., Pitenis, Z., & Çöltekin, Ç. (2020) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.188 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Kumar, S., Hooi, B., Makhija, D., Kumar, M., Faloutsos, C., & Subrahmanian, V. S. (2018) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3159652.3159729 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Incorporating stock prices and news sentiments for stock market prediction: A case of Hong Kong
Li, X., Wu, P., & Wang, W. (2020) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102212 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Empath: Understanding Topic Signals in Large-Scale Text
Fast, E., Chen, B., & Bernstein, M. S. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858535 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Study on Lexicon Based Approaches for Sentiment Analysis
Bonta, V., Kumaresh, N., & Janardhan, N. (2019) · Asian Journal of Computer Science and Technology · doi:10.51983/ajcst-2019.8.s2.2037 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawed
Jakesch, M., Hancock, J. T., & Naaman, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2208839120 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Community Interaction and Conflict on the Web
Kumar, S., Hamilton, W. L., Leskovec, J., & Jurafsky, D. (2018) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3178876.3186141 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Beneath the Tip of the Iceberg: Current Challenges and New Directions in Sentiment Analysis Research
Poria, S., Hazarika, D., Majumder, N., & Mihalcea, R. F. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2020.3038167 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Althoff, T., Clark, K., & Leskovec, J. (2016) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00111 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Goldenberg, A., & Gross, J. J. (2020) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.009 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
The impact of sentiment and attention measures on stock market volatility
Audrino, F., Sigrist, F., & Ballinari, D. (2019) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.05.010 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Unsupervised Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Generative Approach
Yang, S., Shu, K., Wang, S., Gu, R., Wu, F., & Liu, H. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33015644 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Rustam, F., Khalid, M., Aslam, W., Rupapara, V., Mehmood, A., & Choi, G. S. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0245909 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Automatic cyberbullying detection: A systematic review
Rosa, H., Pereira, N., Ribeiro, R., Ferreira, P. C., Carvalho, J. P., Oliveira, S., Coheur, L., Paulino, P., Veiga Simão, A. M., & Trancoso, I. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.021 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpus
Dodge, J., Sap, M., Marasović, A., Agnew, W., Ilharco, G., Groeneveld, D., Mitchell, M., & Gardner, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.98 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Comparing BERT against traditional machine learning text classification
González-Carvajal, S., & Garrido-Merchán, E. C. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.13012 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Image–text sentiment analysis via deep multimodal attentive fusion
Huang, F., Zhang, X., Zhao, Z., Xu, J. J., & Li, Z. (2019) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2019.01.019 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Transformer based Deep Intelligent Contextual Embedding for Twitter sentiment analysis
Naseem, U., Razzak, I., Musiał, K., & Imran, M. A. (2020) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.06.050 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Topic modeling and sentiment analysis of global climate change tweets
Dahal, B., Kumar, S. A. P., & Li, Z. (2019) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-019-0568-8 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Trotzek, M., Koitka, S., & Friedrich, C. M. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2018.2885515 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
SemEval-2018 Task 3: Irony Detection in English Tweets
Hee, C. V., Lefever, E., & Hoste, V. (2018) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/s18-1005 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Predicting Fluctuations in Cryptocurrency Transactions Based on User Comments and Replies
Kim, Y., Kim, J. G., Kim, W., Im, J., Kim, T. H., Kang, S.-J., & Kim, C. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161197 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Hussain, A., Tahir, A., Hussain, Z., Sheikh, Z., Gogate, M., Dashtipour, K. K., Ali, A., & Sheikh, A. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/26627 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive LanguagePreprint
Davidson, T., Warmsley, D., Macy, M. W., & Weber, I. G. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.04009 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
A survey of state-of-the-art approaches for emotion recognition in text
Alswaidan, N., & Menaï, M. E. B. (2020) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-020-01449-0 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Price Movement Prediction of Cryptocurrencies Using Sentiment Analysis and Machine Learning
Valencia, F., Gómez-Espinosa, A., & Valdés-Aguirre, B. (2019) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e21060589 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Valdez, D., ten Thij, M., Bathina, K. C., Rutter, L. A., & Bollen, J. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/21418 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
The future of service: The power of emotion in human-robot interaction
Chuah, S. H., & Yu, J. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102551 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
A survey of Twitter research: Data model, graph structure, sentiment analysis and attacks
Antonakaki, D., Fragopoulou, P., & Ioannidis, S. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114006 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Using VADER sentiment and SVM for predicting customer response sentiment
Borg, A., & Boldt, M. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113746 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in communication impacts language and social relationships
Hohenstein, J., Kizilcec, R. F., DiFranzo, D. J., Aghajari, Z., Mieczkowski, H., Levy, K. E. C., Naaman, M., Hancock, J. T., & Jung, M. F. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-30938-9 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
A novel LSTM–CNN–grid search-based deep neural network for sentiment analysis
Priyadarshini, I., & Cotton, C. (2021) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-021-03838-w · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Akhtar, M. S., Ekbal, A., & Cambria, E. (2020) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.1109/mci.2019.2954667 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
A novel ensemble deep learning model for stock prediction based on stock prices and news
Li, Y., & Pan, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-021-00279-9 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Sentiment Analysis for Fake News Detection
Alonso, M. Á., Vilares, D., Gómez‐Rodríguez, C., & Vilares, J. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10111348 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Mao, R., Liu, Q., He, K., Li, W., & Cambria, E. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2022.3204972 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Topics, trends, and sentiments of tweets about the COVID-19 pandemic: Temporal infoveillance study
Chandrasekaran, R., Mehta, V., Valkunde, T., & Moustakas, E. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/22624 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
ChatGPT in education: global reactions to AI innovations
Fütterer, T., Fischer, C., Alekseeva, A., Chen, X., Tate, T., Warschauer, M., & Gerjets, P. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-42227-6 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2016) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0743-z · Cited by 239 · see citing works
An analysis of COVID-19 vaccine sentiments and opinions on Twitter
Yousefinaghani, S., Dara, R. A., Mubareka, S., Papadopoulos, A., & Sharif, S. (2021) · International Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2021.05.059 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Moore, F. C., Obradovich, N., Lehner, F., & Baylis, P. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1816541116 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Timed intervention in COVID-19 and panic buying
Prentice, C., Chen, J., & Stantic, B. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102203 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Mining Twitter Data for Improved Understanding of Disaster Resilience
Zou, L., Lam, N., Cai, H., & Qiang, Y. (2018) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2017.1421897 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Alharbi, A. S. M., & de Doncker, E. (2018) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.10.001 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Cryptocurrency Price Prediction Using Tweet Volumes and Sentiment Analysis
Abraham, J., Higdon, D., Nelson, J. B., & Ibarra, J. G. (2018) · SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University) · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Persuasion for Good: Towards a Personalized Persuasive Dialogue System for Social Good
Wang, X., Shi, W., Kim, R., Oh, Y., Yang, S., Zhang, J., & Yu, Z. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1566 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Quantifying the effect of sentiment on information diffusion in social media
Ferrara, E., & Yang, Z. (2015) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.26 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
A Survey of Text Representation and Embedding Techniques in NLP
Patil, R., Boit, S., Gudivada, V. N., & Nandigam, J. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3266377 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Sentiment Analysis in Health and Well-Being: Systematic Review
Žunić, A., Corcoran, P., & Spasić, . (2019) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/16023 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Comparison of text preprocessing methods
Chai, C. P. (2022) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324922000213 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Hierarchical Propagation Networks for Fake News Detection: Investigation and Exploitation
Shu, K., Mahudeswaran, D., Wang, S., & Liu, H. (2020) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7329 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Detecting and Monitoring Hate Speech in Twitter
Pereira-Kohatsu, J. C., Quijano-Sánchez, L., Liberatore, F., & Camacho‐Collados, M. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19214654 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Kumar, A., Srinivasan, K., Cheng, W.-H., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2019) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102141 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Sentiment analysis and opinion mining on educational data: A survey
Shaik, T., Tao, X., Dann, C., Xie, H., Li, Y., & Galligan, L. (2023) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2022.100003 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Stochastic Neural Networks for Cryptocurrency Price Prediction
Patel, J., Kalariya, V., Parmar, P., Tanwar, S., Kumar, N., & Alazab, M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2990659 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Towards generalisable hate speech detection: a review on obstacles and solutions
Yin, W., & Zubiaga, A. (2021) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.598 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Son, L. H., Kumar, A., Sangwan, S. R., Arora, A., Nayyar, A., & Abdel-Basset, M. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2899260 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Hopp, F. R., Fisher, J., Cornell, D., Huskey, R., & Weber, R. (2020) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01433-0 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Exposures and behavioural responses to wildfire smoke
Burke, M., Heft‐Neal, S., Li, J., Driscoll, A., Baylis, P., Stigler, M., Weill, J., Burney, J. A., Wen, J., Childs, M. L., et al. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01396-6 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Shu, K., Mahudeswaran, D., Wang, S., Lee, D., & Liu, H. (2018) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.01286 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Movie Recommendation System Using Sentiment Analysis From Microblogging Data
Kumar, S., De, K., & Roy, P. P. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2020.2993585 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
You, Q., Luo, J., Jin, H., & Yang, J. (2016) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/2835776.2835779 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
A Survey of Sentiment Analysis from Social Media Data
Chakraborty, K., Bhattacharyya, S., & Bag, R. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2019.2956957 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Refining Word Embeddings for Sentiment Analysis
Yu, L.-C., Wang, J., Lai, K.-H. R., & Zhang, X. (2017) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1056 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Which online reviews do consumers find most helpful? A multi-method investigation
Eslami, S. P., Ghasemaghaei, M., & Hassanein, K. (2018) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2018.06.012 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Qi, Y., & Shabrina, Z. (2023) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-023-01030-x · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Fuzzy rule based unsupervised sentiment analysis from social media posts
Vashishtha, S., & Susan, S. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112834 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
A Complete VADER-Based Sentiment Analysis of Bitcoin (BTC) Tweets during the Era of COVID-19
Pano, T., & Kashef, R. F. (2020) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc4040033 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Predicting mild cognitive impairment from spontaneous spoken utterances
Asgari, M., Kaye, J., & Dodge, H. (2017) · Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.trci.2017.01.006 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Pataranutaporn, P., Liu, R., Finn, E., & Maes, P. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00720-7 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Sentiment analysis for software engineering
Lin, B., Zampetti, F., Bavota, G., Penta, M. D., Lanza, M., & Oliveto, R. (2018) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3180155.3180195 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Sentiment analysis: A survey on design framework, applications and future scopes
Bordoloi, M., & Biswas, S. K. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10442-2 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Aljedaani, W., Rustam, F., Mkaouer, M. W., Ghallab, A., Rupapara, V., Washington, P. B., Lee, E., & Ashraf, I. (2022) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109780 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Financial Sentiment Analysis: Techniques and Applications
Du, K., Xing, F., Mao, R., & Cambria, E. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3649451 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Refining Word Embeddings Using Intensity Scores for Sentiment Analysis
Yu, L.-C., Wang, J., Lai, K.-H. R., & Zhang, X. (2017) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2017.2788182 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
CoAID: COVID-19 Healthcare Misinformation DatasetPreprint
Cui, L., & Lee, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.00885 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hutto, C., & Gilbert, E.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
- Published
- 2014-05-16
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 216-225
- ISSN
- 2162-3449 (ISSN-L)
- 2334-0770
- OpenAlex
- W2099813784
- Semantic Scholar
- bcdc102c04fb0e7d4652e8bcc7edd2983bb9576d
- Cited by
- 6,087
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 676 · 2025: 846 · 2024: 877 · 2023: 885 · 2022: 731 · 2021: 714 · 2020: 526 · 2019: 332 · 2018: 245 · 2017: 148 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 50.06
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (publishedVersion)
- AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- sentiment analysis, VADER, rule-based sentiment analysis, social media text, tweets, lexical features, sentiment intensity, microblogging, human raters
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
