Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1Elder Abuse and NeglectHealthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Supported decision-making to assist older persons experiencing elder abuse: An integrative review

Abstract

Abstract Background Elder abuse is an ongoing issue experienced by older persons in Australia, with instances of neglect, emotional, and physical abuse being reported to the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety. Aim The aim of this integrative review was to explore the evidence on the effectiveness of supported decision-making for applying to advocacy in older people and people experiencing elder abuse. Methods A systematic search was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses guidelines, across multiple databases including: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and Trove. One thousand two hundred-ten articles were screened for relevance using titles and abstracts. Of these, seven met the inclusion criteria. Findings Content analysis informed the development of four themes pertaining to supported decision-making amongst older persons: personal and environmental factors, relationship between decision maker and support person, information and training, and models and frameworks to aid assessment. Discussion Supported decision making presents an important move towards promoting, protecting, and ensuring human rights for people who may have previously been exposed to more paternalistic approaches. Conclusion The review highlighted gaps in the strength of evidence and was therefore not able to offer conclusive advice on of effectiveness of supported decision making in older people experiencing abuse. This review highlights the need for further research to be conducted to identify how best to offer supported decision making to support the autonomy and human rights of the older person.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.colegn.2020.12.003

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 1

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Adams, 2014, Financial abuse of older people by a family member: a difficult terrain for service providers in Australia, Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 26, 270, 10.1080/08946566.2013.824844 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bail, 2016, ‘Failure to Maintain’: a theoretical proposition for a new quality indicator of nurse care rationing for complex older people in hospital, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 63, 146, 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.08.001 · DOI
  3. Baldwin, 2017, Corruption in the family: financial abuse of older people in Australia, Current Perspectives and Future Challenges, 335
  4. Binder, 1998, Guidelines for assessing the decision making capacities of potential research subjects with cognitive impairment, Am J Psychiatry, 155
  5. Dong, 2015, Elder abuse: Systematic review and implications for practice, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 63, 1214, 10.1111/jgs.13454 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Ganguli, 2010, Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment by multiple classifications: The Monongahela-Youghiogheny Healthy Aging Team (MYHAT) project, The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18, 674, 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181cdee4f · DOI · Paper page
  7. Harrison, 2020, Trends in prevalance of dementia for people accessing aged care services in Australia, The Journal of Gerontology: Series A, 75, 318
  8. Hegde, 2016, Capacity issues and decision-making in dementia, Ann Indian Acad Neurol, 19, S34, 10.4103/0972-2327.192890 · DOI
  9. Ibrahim, 2015, Nature and extent of external-cause deaths of nursing home residents in Victoria, Australia, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 63, 954, 10.1111/jgs.13377 · DOI
  10. Keeling, 2016, Supported decision making: the rights of people with dementia, Nursing Standard, 30, 38, 10.7748/ns.30.30.38.s45 · DOI
  11. Moher, 2009, Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, PLoS Medicine, 6, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Peisah, 2016, Knowledge translation regarding financial abuse and dementia for the banking sector: the development and testing of an education tool, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 31, 702, 10.1002/gps.4379 · DOI
  13. Samsi, 2013, Everyday decision-making in dementia: findings from a longitudinal interview study of people with dementia and family carers, International Psychogeriatrics, 25, 949, 10.1017/S1041610213000306 · DOI
  14. Sethi, 2011, European report on preventing elder maltreatment, “Regional Office for Europe” Copenhagen
  15. Sinclair, 2018, How couples with dementia experience healthcare, lifestyle, and everyday decision-making, International Psychogeriatrics, 30, 1, 10.1017/S1041610218000741 · DOI
  16. Whittemore, 2005, The integrative review: updated methodology, J Adv Nurs, Vol. 52, 546, 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. Willis, 2016, Rounding, work intensification and new public management, Nursing Inquiry, 23, 158, 10.1111/nin.12116 · DOI
  18. Zannettino, 2015, The role of emotional vulnerability and abuse in the financial exploitation of older people from culturally and linguistically diverse communities in Australia, Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 27, 74, 10.1080/08946566.2014.976895 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Strickland, K., Bail, K., Cope, S., Turner, M., & Moss, C.
Affiliations
University of Canberra (AU)
Corresponding author
Strickland, Karen
Venue
Collegian
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
447-455
ISSN
1322-7696 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3119853723
Cited by
1
References
26
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia (publishedVersion)
Funders
Aged and Disability Advocacy Australia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
supported decision-making, elder abuse, older adults, advocacy, autonomy, human rights, paternalism, neglect, emotional abuse, physical abuse, evaluation framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supported decision-making to assist older persons experiencing elder abuse: An integrative review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.colegn.2020.12.003
The paper
Strickland, K., Bail, K., Cope, S., Turner, M., & Moss, C. (2021). Supported decision-making to assist older persons experiencing elder abuse: An integrative review. Collegian. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2020.12.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.