Elder Abuse: Systematic Review and Implications for Practice
Open accessAbstract
This article is based on the lecture for the 2014 American Geriatrics Society Outstanding Scientific Achievement for Clinical Investigation Award. Elder abuse is a global public health and human rights problem. Evidence suggests that elder abuse is prevalent, predictable, costly, and sometimes fatal. This review will highlight the global epidemiology of elder abuse in terms of its prevalence, risk factors, and consequences in community populations. The global literature in PubMed, MEDLINE , Psyc INFO , BIOSIS , Science Direct, and Cochrane Central was searched. Search terms included elder abuse, elder mistreatment, elder maltreatment, prevalence, incidence, risk factors, protective factors, outcomes, and consequences. Studies that existed only as abstracts, case series, or case reports or recruited individuals younger than 60; qualitative studies; and non‐English publications were excluded. Tables and figures were created to highlight the findings: the most‐detailed analyses to date of the prevalence of elder abuse according to continent, risk and protective factors, graphic presentation of odds ratios and confidence intervals for major risk factors, consequences, and practical suggestions for health professionals in addressing elder abuse. Elder abuse is common in community‐dwelling older adults, especially minority older adults. This review identifies important knowledge gaps, such as a lack of consistency in definitions of elder abuse; insufficient research with regard to screening; and etiological, intervention, and prevention research. Concerted efforts from researchers, community organizations, healthcare and legal professionals, social service providers, and policy‐makers should be promoted to address the global problem of elder abuse.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Leung, M. W. (2004) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyh010 · Cited by 565 · see citing works
Fisher, B. S., & Regan, S. L. (2006) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/46.2.200 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
A systematic review of interventions for elder abuse
Ploeg, J., Fear, J., Hutchison, B., MacMillan, H., & Bolan, G. (2009) · Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1080/08946560902997181 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Abuse of people with dementia by family carers: representative cross sectional survey
Cooper, C., Selwood, A., Blanchard, M., Walker, Z., Blizard, R., & Livingston, G. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b155 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Is psychological vulnerability related to the experience of fraud in older adults?
Lichtenberg, P. A., Stickney, L., & Paulson, D. (2013) · Clinical Gerontologist · doi:10.1080/07317115.2012.749323 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Prevalence and Psychological Impact of Chinese Elder Abuse
YAN, E., & TANG, C. S.-K. (2001) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/088626001016011004 · Cited by 142 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For instance, one study used the revised CTS and regarded older adults who endorsed any item of the measurement as having experienced verbal abuse and found a 1-year prevalence of 21%.(31) Another study used the modified CTS but included those who endorsed 10 or more items as having experienced psychological abuse and…”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Muhammad, T., Meher, T., & Sekher, T. V. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055625 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Lifetime Abuse and Mental Health Among Older Persons: A European Study
Eslami, B., Macassa, G., Melchiorre, M. G., Barros, H., Viitasara, E., Lindert, J., Stankunas, M., Torres-Gonzalez, F., Ioannidi-Kapolou, E., & Soares, J. J. F. (2017) · Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma · doi:10.1080/10926771.2017.1330295 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dong, X. Q.
- Affiliations
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dong, Xin Qi
- ORCID
- Dong, Xin Qi
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1214-1238
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- PMC
- PMC9958516
- OpenAlex
- W2136979783
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 11.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R01 AG042318, R01 MD006173, R01 NR 14846, R01 CA163830, R34MH100443, R34MH100393, RC4 AG039085)
- Starr Foundation
- American Federation for Aging Research
- John A. Hartford Foundation
- Atlantic Philanthropies
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child Abuse and Related Trauma
- Keywords
- elder abuse, prevalence, risk factors, protective factors, community-dwelling older adults, minority older adults, elder abuse screening, elder abuse prevention, elder abuse intervention, global epidemiology
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Elder Abuse, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Social Work, Socioeconomic Factors, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review