The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research on the application of block chain big data platform in the construction of new smart city for low carbon emission and green environment
Abstract
Abstract The sharing of government information resources is significant for improving the level of governance and social information. However, due to the existence of cross-domain security and trust islands, government departments are hindering the sharing of government information resources with other organizations and the public. To this end, the blockchain technology is used to construct a decentralized distributed peer-to-peer trust service system, which is integrated with the existing PKI/CA security system to establish a new trust model that supports multi-CA coexistence. Based on this, the structural composition and functional data flow of the blockchain smart city information resource sharing and exchange model designed in this paper. This paper launched a study on the role of the smart big data platform, and selected the development of smart cities in Hefei as an empirical analysis. From the connotation of smart city, block chain and big data technology combined, and the positive effects of relevant information technology summarized on the construction of smart city big data platform. Based on this, the smart city development level evaluation model of TOPSIS method constructed. The evaluation model constructed to make a vertical comparison from 2012 to 2017, the scale of smart cities is growing at an average annual rate of more than 30%, saving 20% of urban resource allocation and becoming a new pillar industry. Therefore, Hefei City should further increase environmental supervision and promote the use of low-carbon environmental protection new energy. The improvement of government management level has a positive effect on the construction of smart Hefei.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Blockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey
Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H. N., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2018) · International Journal of Web and Grid Services · doi:10.1504/ijwgs.2018.095647 · Cited by 3,651
Cited by
Bhushan, B., Khamparia, A., Sagayam, K. M., Sharma, S. K., Ahad, M. A., & Debnath, N. C. (2020) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102360 · Cited by 353
A Comparative Study: Blockchain Technology Utilization Benefits, Challenges and Functionalities
Ali, O., Jaradat, A., Kulakli, A., & Abuhalimeh, A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3050241 · Cited by 294
Tan, L., Yang, Z., Irfan, M., Ding, C. J., Hu, M., & Hu, J. (2024) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3584 · Cited by 268
Blockchain technology in the smart city: A bibliometric review
Rejeb, A., Rejeb, K., Simske, S. J., & Keogh, J. G. (2022) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-021-01251-2 · Cited by 104
Shan, S., Duan, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, T. T., & Li, H. (2021) · Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society · doi:10.1155/2021/6634386 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, M., & Zhang, J.
- Venue
- Computer Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 149
- Pages
- 332-342
- ISSN
- 0140-3664 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2988375719
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.