The DOI matches its Crossref record; 175 of the 175 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comparative Study: Blockchain Technology Utilization Benefits, Challenges and Functionalities
Open accessAbstract
Blockchain technology enables users to verify, preserve, and synchronize the contents of a data sheet (a transaction ledger) replicated by multiple users. Blockchain technology has provided considerable advantages and incentives to industries in terms of enabling better services. This review aims to explore the benefits, challenges and functionalities that affect blockchain applications in different sectors. This article is constructed as a systematic literature review study. From 1976 articles, 168 final articles were selected and classified into three main dimensions, that is, benefits, challenges, and functionalities, in four different sectors: government, financial, manufacturing, and healthcare. The results were extracted and compared based on factors in three dimensions, which were categorized as benefits (informational, technological, economic, organizational, and strategic), challenges (technological, organizational, adoption, operational, and environmental and sustainability), and functionalities (point-to-point transmission, data ownership, data protection, and transaction processing). The results of this review study aim to support professionals, practitioners, and stakeholders who wish to implement and manage transformation projects related to blockchain in their sectors. Moreover, helping these possible blockchain users to understand the implied factors associated with blockchain would be beneficial for the decision-making processes of their organizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4132319 · Cited by 7,449
Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things
Christidis, K., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2016.2566339 · Cited by 4,552
Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
Shea, B. J., Grimshaw, J. M., Wells, G. A., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C., Porter, A. C., Tugwell, P., Moher, D., & Bouter, L. M. (2007) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-7-10 · Cited by 4,374
Wohlin, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2601248.2601268 · Cited by 4,234 · cited 2×
“It is applied to utilize the rundown of references to recognize the new articles suitable for inclusion [54].”
MethodBlockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management
Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261 · Cited by 4,118
Blockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey
Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H. N., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2018) · International Journal of Web and Grid Services · doi:10.1504/ijwgs.2018.095647 · Cited by 3,651
(2015) · Cited by 3,471
A Multi‐Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x · Cited by 3,244
Decentralizing Privacy: Using Blockchain to Protect Personal Data
Zyskind, G., Nathan, O., & Pentland, A. '. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops · doi:10.1109/spw.2015.27 · Cited by 2,617
Cited by
Blockchain for the metaverse: A Review
Huynh-The, T., Gadekallu, T. R., Wang, W., Yenduri, G., Ranaweera, P., Pham, Q.-V., da Costa, D. B., & Liyanage, M. (2023) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2023.02.008 · Cited by 771
Ali, O., Abdelbaki, W., Shrestha, A., Elbasi, E., Alryalat, M. A. A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2023.100333 · Cited by 568
Self-citationAli, O., Murray, P. A., Momin, M., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Malik, T. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123076 · Cited by 317
Self-citationChemnad, K., & Othman, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1349668 · Cited by 140
The impact of 6G-IoT technologies on the development of agriculture 5.0: a review
Polymeni, S., Plastras, S., Skoutas, D. N., Kormentzas, G., & Skianis, C. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12122651 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Ali, O., Jaradat, A., Kulakli, A., & Abuhalimeh, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 12730-12749
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3119925017
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 175
- FWCI
- 48.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparative Study: Blockchain Technology Utilization Benefits, Challenges and Functionalities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2021.3050241
- The paper
- Ali, O., Jaradat, A., Kulakli, A., & Abuhalimeh, A. (2021). A Comparative Study: Blockchain Technology Utilization Benefits, Challenges and Functionalities. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3050241
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
