Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,217

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On the features and challenges of security and privacy in distributed internet of things

Roman, Rodrigo, Zhou, Jianying, Lopez, Javier·2013·Computer Networks

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.comnet.2012.12.018

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. A. Gómez-Goiri, D. López-de-Ipiña, On the complementarity of Triple Spaces and the Web of Things, in: 2nd International Workshop on Web of Things (WoT’11), San Francisco, USA, 2011. · doi:10.1145/1993966.1993983
  2. Ning, 2012, Cyber-physical-social based security architecture for future internet of things, Advances in Internet of Things, 2, 1, 10.4236/ait.2012.21001 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Joachim W. Walewski (Ed.), D1.2 – Initial Architectural Reference Model for IoT, IoT-A Project, 2011. <http://www.iot-a.eu/public/public-documents>.
  4. M. Ohashi, Introduction of Ubiquitous Service Platform Project CUBIQ, in: 10th International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems (ISADS’11), Kobe, Japan, 2011, pp. 456–460. · doi:10.1109/isads.2011.66
  5. A. Williams. How the Internet of Things Helps us Understand Radiation Levels. <https://cosm.com/press> (accessed 11.12).
  6. Viehland, 2010, The future of personal area networks in a ubiquitous computing world, International Journal of Advanced Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 2, 30, 10.4018/japuc.2010040102 · DOI
  7. Schaffers, 2011, Smart cities and the future internet: towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation, vol. 6656, 431
  8. S. Babar, P. Mahalle, A. Stango, N. Prasad, R. Prasad, Proposed Security Model and Threat Taxonomy for the Internet of Things (IoT), in: 3rd International Conference on Recent Trends in Network Security and Applications (CNSA’10), Chennai, India, 2010, pp. 420–429. · DOI · Paper page
  9. S. Turner, T. Polk, Security Challenges For the Internet of Things, in: IAB Interconnecting Smart Objects with the Internet Workshop, Prague, Czech Republic, 2011.
  10. Roman, 2011, Securing the internet of things, IEEE Computer, 44, 51, 10.1109/MC.2011.291 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Mahalle, 2010, Identity management framework towards Internet of Things (IoT): roadmap and key challenges, vol. 89, 430
  12. Hartenstein, 2008, A tutorial survey on vehicular ad hoc networks, IEEE Communications Magazine, 46, 164, 10.1109/MCOM.2008.4539481 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Ilie-Zudor, 2011, A survey of applications and requirements of unique identification systems and RFID techniques, Computers in Industry, 62, 227, 10.1016/j.compind.2010.10.004 · DOI
  14. J. Takalo-Mattila, J. Kiljander, M. Etelapera, J.-P. Soininen, Ubiquitous computing by utilizing semantic interoperability with item-level object identification, in: Second International ICST Conference on Mobile Networks and Management (MONAMI’10), Santander, Spain, 2010, pp. 198–209. · DOI
  15. T. Bauge (Ed.), D3.5 – Global and Pluggable Sensor and Actuator Networking Framework, SENSEI Project, 2011. <http://www.sensei-project.eu/>.
  16. H. Akram, M. Hoffmann, Supports for identity management in ambient environments – the hydra approach, in: 3rd International Conference on Systems and Networks Communications (ICSNC’08), Sliema, Malta, 2008, pp. 371–377. · DOI
  17. D. Guinard, M. Fischer, V. Trifa, Sharing using social networks in a composable web of things, in: 1st International Workshop on the Web of Things (WoT’10), Mannheim, Germany, 2010, pp. 702–707. · DOI · Paper page
  18. S.G. Weber, L.A. Martucci, S. Ries, M. Mühlhäuser, Towards trustworthy identity and access management for the future internet, in: 4th International Workshop on Trustworthy Internet of People, Things & Services (Trustworthy IoPTS’10), 2010.
  19. Sarma, 2009, Identities in the future internet of things, Wireless Personal Communications, 49, 353, 10.1007/s11277-009-9697-0 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Z. Wei, C. Meinel, Implement role based access control with attribute certificates, in: 6th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT’04), Phoenix Park, Korea, 2004, pp. 536–540.
  21. G. Bai, L. Yan, L. Gu, Y. Guo, X. Chen, Context-aware usage control for web of things, Security and Communication Networks (in press). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sec.424/abstract. · doi:10.1002/sec.424/abstract
  22. M. Brachmann, S.L. Keoh, O.G. Morchon, S.S. Kumar, End-to-end transport security in the IP-based internet of things, in: 21st International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN’12), Munich, Germany, 2012, pp. 1–5. · DOI
  23. S. Raza, S. Duquennoy, J. Hglund, U. Roedig, T. Voigt, Secure communication for the internet of things – a comparison of link-layer security and IPsec for 6LoWPAN, Security and Communication Networks (in press). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sec.406/abstract. · doi:10.1002/sec.406/abstract
  24. Roman, 2011, Key management systems for sensor networks in the context of the internet of things, Computers & Electrical Engineering, 37, 147, 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2011.01.009 · DOI · Paper page
  25. I. Verbauwhede, J. Fan, Light-weight public key implementations for constrained devices, in: Workshop on Cryptography for the Internet of Things, Antwerp, Belgium, 2012.
  26. K. Beznosov, P. Inglesant, J. Lobo, R. Reeder, M. Zurko, Panel: usability meets access control: challenges and research opportunities, in: 14th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies (SACMAT’09), Stresa, Italy, 2009. · DOI
  27. Aggarwal, 2008, A general survey of privacy-preserving data mining models and algorithms, vol. 34, 11
  28. Y. Shen, S. Pearson, Privacy Enhancing Technologies: A Review, Tech. rep., HP Laboratories, 2011.
  29. V. Oleshchuk, Internet of things and privacy preserving technologies, in: 1st International Conference on Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace & Electronic Systems Technology (WirelessVITAE’09), Aalborg, Denmark, 2009, pp. 336–340. · DOI
  30. P. Angin, B. Bhargava, R. Ranchal, N. Singh, M. Linderman, L.B. Othmane, L. Lilien, An entity-centric approach for privacy and identity management in cloud computing, in: 29th IEEE Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS’10), New Delhi, India, 2010, pp. 177–183. · DOI
  31. Weber, 2010, Internet of things new security and privacy challenges, Computer Law & Security Review, 26, 23, 10.1016/j.clsr.2009.11.008 · DOI · Paper page
  32. S. Radomirovic, Towards a model for security and privacy in the internet of things, in: 1st International Workshop on the Security of the Internet of Things (SecIoT’10), Tokyo, Japan, 2010.
  33. G. Broenink, J.-H. Hoepman, C. van’t Hof, R. van Kranenburg, D. Smits, T. Wisman, The privacy coach: supporting customer privacy in the Internet of things, in: Pervasive 2010 Conference Workshop on What can the Internet of Things do for the citizen? (CIoT’10), Helsinki, Finland, 2010, pp. 72–81.
  34. Button, 2011, Setting the watch privacy and ethics of CCTV surveillance, International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 39, 215, 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2011.08.003 · doi:10.1016/j.ijlcj.2011.08.003
  35. J.-H. Hoepman, In Things We Trust? Towards trustability in the Internet of Things, CoRR abs/1109.2637. · arXiv
  36. Køien, 2011, Reflections on trust in devices: an informal survey of human trust in an internet-of-things context, Wireless Personal Communications, 61, 495, 10.1007/s11277-011-0386-4 · DOI
  37. A. Jøsang, R. Hayward, S. Pope, Trust Network Analysis with Subjective Logic, in: 29th Australasian Computer Science Conference (ACSC’06), Hobart, Australia, 2006.
  38. Cho, 2011, A survey on trust management for mobile ad hoc networks, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 13, 562, 10.1109/SURV.2011.092110.00088 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Trcek, 2011, Trust management in the pervasive computing era, IEEE Security & Privacy, 9, 52, 10.1109/MSP.2011.95 · DOI
  40. J. Robinson, I. Wakeman, D. Chalmers, B. Horsfall, Trust and the internet of things, in: Joint International Workshop on Trust in Location and Communications in Decentralised Computing (TruLoco’10), Morioka, Japan, 2010.
  41. T. Teixeira, S. Hachem, V. Issarny, N. Georgantas, Service oriented middleware for the internet of things: a perspective, in: Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Towards a Service-based Internet (ServiceWave’11), Poznan, Poland, 2011, pp. 220–229. · DOI
  42. S. Amin, Y. jig Young, M. Siddiqui, C.S. Hong, A novel intrusion detection framework for IP-based sensor networks, in: International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN’09), 2009, pp. 1–3.
  43. Chen, 2011, A security situation sense model based on artificial immune system in the internet of things, Advanced Materials Research, 403–408, 2457, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.403-408.2457 · doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.403-408.2457
  44. G. Singh, F. Masseglia, C. Fiot, A. Marascu, P. Poncelet, Data mining for intrusion detection: from outliers to true intrusions, in: 13th Pacific–Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD-09), Bangkok, Thailand, 2009. · DOI
  45. Zhang, 2011, Distributed intrusion detection system in a multi-layer network architecture of smart grids, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2, 796, 10.1109/TSG.2011.2159818 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,217

Metadata

Authors
Roman, R., Zhou, J., & Lopez, J.
Venue
Computer Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
57
Issue
10
Pages
2266-2279
ISSN
1389-1286
Cited by
1,217
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the features and challenges of security and privacy in distributed internet of things. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.comnet.2012.12.018
The paper
Roman, R., Zhou, J., & Lopez, J. (2013). On the features and challenges of security and privacy in distributed internet of things. Computer Networks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2012.12.018

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.