Cited by 589Internet of Things and AIIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingIoT Networks and Protocols

Internet of Things applications: A systematic review

Asghari, Parvaneh, Rahmani, Amir Masoud, Javadi, Hamid Haj Seyyed·2019·Computer Networks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.comnet.2018.12.008

Cites

122 of 122 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asghari, P., Rahmani, A. M., & Javadi, H. H. S.
Affiliations
  • Islamic Azad University, Tehran (IR)
  • Shahed University (IR)
Corresponding author
Rahmani, Amir Masoud
Venue
Computer Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
148
Pages
241-261
ISSN
1389-1286 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2905503927
Cited by
589
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 27
FWCI
9.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computer Networks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IoT Networks and Protocols
Keywords
Internet of Things, IoT applications, smart services, health care applications, environmental monitoring, smart cities, Industrial Internet of Things, quality of service

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review