The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aerial imagery pile burn detection using deep learning: The FLAME dataset
Open accessAbstract
Wildfires are one of the costliest and deadliest natural disasters in the US, causing damage to millions of hectares of forest resources and threatening the lives of people and animals. Of particular importance are risks to firefighters and operational forces, which highlights the need for leveraging technology to minimize danger to people and property. FLAME (Fire Luminosity Airborne-based Machine learning Evaluation) offers a dataset of aerial images of fires along with methods for fire detection and segmentation which can help firefighters and researchers to develop optimal fire management strategies. This paper provides a fire image dataset collected by drones during a prescribed burning piled detritus in an Arizona pine forest. The dataset includes video recordings and thermal heatmaps captured by infrared cameras. The captured videos and images are annotated, and labeled frame-wise to help researchers easily apply their fire detection and modeling algorithms. The paper also highlights solutions to two machine learning problems: (1) Binary classification of video frames based on the presence [and absence] of fire flames. An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) method is developed that achieved a 76% classification accuracy. (2) Fire detection using segmentation methods to precisely determine fire borders. A deep learning method is designed based on the U-Net up-sampling and down-sampling approach to extract a fire mask from the video frames. Our FLAME method approached a precision of 92%, and recall of 84%. Future research will expand the technique for free burning broadcast fire using thermal images.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404
Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision
Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., & Wojna, Z. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.308 · Cited by 32,138
Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions
Chollet, F. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.195 · Cited by 20,380
Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learning
Szegedy, C., Ioffe, S., Vanhoucke, V., & Alemi, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11231 · Cited by 4,636
Friedlingstein, P., Jones, M. W., O'Sullivan, M., Andrew, R. M., Hauck, J., Peters, G. P., Peters, W., Pongratz, J., Sitch, S., Le Quéré, C., et al. (2019) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019 · Cited by 1,657
Help from the Sky: Leveraging UAVs for Disaster Management
Erdelj, M., Natalizio, E., Chowdhury, K. R., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2017) · IEEE Pervasive Computing · doi:10.1109/mprv.2017.11 · Cited by 996
Deep Reinforcement Learning: An Overview
Li, Y. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.07274 · Cited by 762
Fire detection in video sequences using a generic color model
Çelik, T., & Demirel, H. (2009) · Fire Safety Journal · doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2008.05.005 · Cited by 553
Traffic light control using deep policy‐gradient and value‐function‐based reinforcement learning
Mousavi, S. S., Schukat, M., & Howley, E. (2017) · IET Intelligent Transport Systems · doi:10.1049/iet-its.2017.0153 · Cited by 354
Cited by
HIT-UAV: A high-altitude infrared thermal dataset for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-based object detection
Suo, J., Wang, T., Zhang, X., Chen, H., Zhou, W., & Shi, W. (2023) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-023-02066-6 · Cited by 291
Drones’ Edge Intelligence Over Smart Environments in B5G: Blockchain and Federated Learning Synergy
Alsamhi, S. H., Almalki, F. A., Afghah, F., Hawbani, A., Shvetsov, A. V., Lee, B., & Song, H. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking · doi:10.1109/tgcn.2021.3132561 · Cited by 139
Self-citationWildfire and Smoke Detection Using Staged YOLO Model and Ensemble CNN
Bahhar, C., Ksibi, A., Ayadi, M., Jamjoom, M. M., Ullah, Z., Soufiene, B. O., & Sakli, H. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12010228 · Cited by 99
Han, Y., Duan, B., Guan, R., Yang, G., & Zhen, Z. (2024) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs16122177 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Shamsoshoara, A., Afghah, F., Razi, A., Zheng, L., Fulé, P. Z., & Blasch, E.
- Venue
- Computer Networks
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-07
- Volume
- 193
- Pages
- 108001
- ISSN
- 1389-1286 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3117841975
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 47.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aerial imagery pile burn detection using deep learning: The FLAME dataset. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108001
- The paper
- Shamsoshoara, A., Afghah, F., Razi, A., Zheng, L., Fulé, P. Z., & Blasch, E. (2021). Aerial imagery pile burn detection using deep learning: The FLAME dataset. Computer Networks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
