Cited by 134Spectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques

Near-infrared spectroscopic sensing system for on-line milk quality assessment in a milking robot

Open access
Kawasaki, Masataka, Kawamura, Shuso, Tsukahara, Maki, Morita, Shigeru, Komiya, Michio, Natsuga, Motoyasu·2008·Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

Abstract

A near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopic sensing system was constructed on an experimental basis. This system enabled NIR spectra of raw milk to be obtained in an automatic milking system (milking robot system) over a wavelength range of 600-1050nm. Calibration models for determining three major milk constituents (fat, protein and lactose), somatic cell count (SCC) and milk urea nitrogen (MUN) of unhomogenized milk were developed, and the precision and accuracy of the models were validated. The coefficient of determination (r ²) and standard error of prediction (SEP) of the validation set for fat were 0.95 and 0.25%, respectively. The values of r ² and SEP for lactose were 0.83 and 0.26%, those for protein were 0.72 and 0.15%, those for SCC were 0.68 and 0.28logSCC/mL, and those for MUN were 0.53 and 1.50mg/dL, respectively. These results indicate that the NIR spectroscopic system can be used to assess milk quality in real-time in an automatic milking system. The system can provide dairy farmers with information on milk quality and physiological condition of an individual cow and, therefore, give them feedback control for optimizing dairy farm management. By using the system, dairy farmers will be able to produce high-quality milk and precision dairy farming will be realized.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compag.2008.01.006

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shao et al. used an in situ portable visible NIR (Vis-NIR) fiber-optic probe to measure intracellular carotenoid content in Spirulina sp. suspensions, predicting carotenoid content using three PLSR prediction models with correlation coefficients as high as 0.96.

    “Shao et al . [71] used an in situ portable visible NIR (Vis-NIR) fiber-optic probe to measure intracellular carotenoid content in Spirulina sp. suspensions. In the study, carotenoid content was predicted using three PLSR prediction models with correlation coefficients as high as 0.96.”

    From Microalgal process-monitoring based on high-selectivity spectroscopy tools: status and future perspectives (2018) · cites this paper as [71]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 2 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Natsuga, M., Kawamura, S., Itoh, K., 2001. Determination of the Quality of High-Moisture Wheat Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (Part 1) -Determination of Moisture and Protein Content in High-Moisture Wheat. J. Jpn. Soc. of Agricultural Machinery. 63(1), 93-99.
  2. Natsuga, M., Kawamura, S., Itoh, K., 2002. Effects of Wavelength Range and Light Path-length on the Accuracy of the Constituent Analysis of Raw Milk Using Near-infrared Spectroscopy. J. Jpn. Soc. of Agricultural Machinery. 64(5), 83-88.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kawasaki, M., Kawamura, S., Tsukahara, M., Morita, S., Komiya, M., & Natsuga, M.
Affiliations
  • Hokkaido University (JP)
  • Rakuno Gakuen University (JP)
  • Yamagata University (JP)
Corresponding author
Kawamura, Shuso
Venue
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
22-27
ISSN
0168-1699 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070263327
Cited by
134
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers and Electronics in Agriculture (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (Hokkaido University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Keywords
near-infrared spectroscopy, milk quality testing, automatic milking systems, milk fat, milk protein, lactose, somatic cell count, milk urea nitrogen, precision dairy farming, calibration models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review