Cited by 17Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

DeepRF: A deep learning method for predicting metabolic pathways in organisms based on annotated genomes

Shah, Hayat Ali, Liu, Juan, Yang, Zhihui, Zhang, Xiaolei, Feng, Jing·2022·Computers in Biology and Medicine

Abstract

The rapid increase of metabolomics has led to an increasing focus on metabolic pathway modeling and reconstruction. In particular, reconstructing an organism's metabolic network based on its genome sequence is a key challenge in systems biology. The method used to address this problem predicts the presence or absence of metabolic pathways from known pathways in a reference database. However, this method is based on manual metabolic pathway construction and cannot be used for large genome sequencing data. To address such problems, we apply a supervised machine learning approach consisting of deep neural networks to learn feature representations of metabolic pathways and feed these representations into random forests to predict metabolic pathways. The supervised learning model, DeepRF, predicts all known and unknown metabolic pathways in an organism. Evaluation of DeepRF on over 318,016 instances shows that the model can predict metabolic pathways with high-performance metrics accuracy (>97%), recall (>95%), and precision (>99%). Comparing DeepRF with other methods in the literature shows that DeepRF produces more reliable results than other methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105756

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shah, H. A., Liu, J., Yang, Z., Zhang, X., & Feng, J.
Affiliations
Wuhan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Juan
Venue
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
147
Pages
105756
ISSN
0010-4825 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283155576
Cited by
17
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers in Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Hubei Technological Innovation Special Fund (2019010701011381, 2019AEA170)
  • Wuhan University
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFA0904303)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
metabolic pathway prediction, metabolic pathway reconstruction, genome annotation, annotated genome, deep neural network, random forest, metabolic network reconstruction, metabolomics, systems biology
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Databases, Factual, Neural Networks, Computer, Genome, Metabolic Networks and Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review