Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 240

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An improved transformer network for skin cancer classification

Open access
Xin, Chao, Liu, Zhifang, Zhao, Keyu, Miao, Linlin, Ma, Yizhao, Zhu, Xiaoxia, Zhou, Qiongyan, Wang, Songting, Li, Lingzhi, Yang, Feng, Xu, Suling, Chen, Haijiang·2022·Computers in Biology and Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Use of artificial intelligence to identify dermoscopic images has brought major breakthroughs in recent years to the early diagnosis and early treatment of skin cancer, the incidence of which is increasing year by year worldwide and poses a great threat to human health. Achievements have been made in the research of skin cancer image classification by using the deep backbone of the convolutional neural network (CNN). This approach, however, only extracts the features of small objects in the image, and cannot locate the important parts. OBJECTIVES: As a result, researchers of the paper turn to vision transformers (VIT) which has demonstrated powerful performance in traditional classification tasks. The self-attention is to improve the value of important features and suppress the features that cause noise. Specifically, an improved transformer network named SkinTrans is proposed. INNOVATIONS: To verify its efficiency, a three step procedure is followed. Firstly, a VIT network is established to verify the effectiveness of SkinTrans in skin cancer classification. Then multi-scale and overlapping sliding windows are used to serialize the image and multi-scale patch embedding is carried out which pay more attention to multi-scale features. Finally, contrastive learning is used which makes the similar data of skin cancer encode similarly so that the encoding results of different data are as different as possible. MAIN RESULTS: The experiment is carried out based on two datasets, namely (1) HAM10000: a large dataset of multi-source dermatoscopic images of common skin cancers; (2)A clinical dataset of skin cancer collected by dermoscopy. The model proposed has achieved 94.3% accuracy on HAM10000 and 94.1% accuracy on our datasets, which verifies the efficiency of SkinTrans. CONCLUSIONS: The transformer network has not only achieved good results in natural language but also achieved ideal results in the field of vision, which also lays a good foundation for skin cancer classification based on multimodal data. This paper is convinced that it will be of interest to dermatologists, clinical researchers, computer scientists and researchers in other related fields, and provide greater convenience for patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105939

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 240

Metadata

Authors
Xin, C., Liu, Z., Zhao, K., Miao, L., Ma, Y., Zhu, X., Zhou, Q., Wang, S., Li, L., Yang, F., Xu, S., & Chen, H.
Venue
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
149
Pages
105939
ISSN
0010-4825 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293030607
Cited by
240
References
4
FWCI
16.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An improved transformer network for skin cancer classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105939
The paper
Xin, C., Liu, Z., Zhao, K., Miao, L., Ma, Y., Zhu, X., Zhou, Q., Wang, S., Li, L., Yang, F., Xu, S., & Chen, H. (2022). An improved transformer network for skin cancer classification. Computers in Biology and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105939

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.