Cited by 28Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementAI in cancer detectionNonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies

Artificial Intelligence Applied to Non-Invasive Imaging Modalities in Identification of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer: A Systematic Review

Open access
Foltz, Emilie A., Witkowski, Alexander, Becker, Alyssa L., Latour, Emile, Lim, Jeong Youn, Hamilton, Andrew, Ludzik, Joanna·2024·Cancers

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study is to systematically analyze the current state of the literature regarding novel artificial intelligence (AI) machine learning models utilized in non-invasive imaging for the early detection of nonmelanoma skin cancers. Furthermore, we aimed to assess their potential clinical relevance by evaluating the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of each algorithm and assessing for the risk of bias. Methods: Two reviewers screened the MEDLINE, Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase databases for peer-reviewed studies that focused on AI-based skin cancer classification involving nonmelanoma skin cancers and were published between 2018 and 2023. The search terms included skin neoplasms, nonmelanoma, basal-cell carcinoma, squamous-cell carcinoma, diagnostic techniques and procedures, artificial intelligence, algorithms, computer systems, dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy, and optical coherence tomography. Based on the search results, only studies that directly answered the review objectives were included and the efficacy measures for each were recorded. A QUADAS-2 risk assessment for bias in included studies was then conducted. Results: A total of 44 studies were included in our review; 40 utilizing dermoscopy, 3 using reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), and 1 for hyperspectral epidermal imaging (HEI). The average accuracy of AI algorithms applied to all imaging modalities combined was 86.80%, with the same average for dermoscopy. Only one of the three studies applying AI to RCM measured accuracy, with a result of 87%. Accuracy was not measured in regard to AI based HEI interpretation. Conclusion: AI algorithms exhibited an overall favorable performance in the diagnosis of nonmelanoma skin cancer via noninvasive imaging techniques. Ultimately, further research is needed to isolate pooled diagnostic accuracy for nonmelanoma skin cancers as many testing datasets also include melanoma and other pigmented lesions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/cancers16030629

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foltz, E. A., Witkowski, A., Becker, A. L., Latour, E., Lim, J. Y., Hamilton, A., & Ludzik, J.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
Corresponding author
Foltz, Emilie A.
Venue
Cancers
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-02-01
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
629
ISSN
2072-6694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391432064
Cited by
28
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Homo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Keywords
artificial intelligence, non-melanoma skin cancer, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy, optical coherence tomography, non-invasive imaging, early detection, diagnostic accuracy, machine learning classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review