The DOI matches its Crossref record; 212 of the 215 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review and classification of recent observers applied in chemical process systems
Open accessAbstract
Observers are computational algorithms designed to estimate unmeasured state variables due to the lack of appropriate estimating devices or to replace high-priced sensors in a plant. It is always important to estimate those states prior to developing state feedback laws for control and to prevent process disruptions, process shutdowns and even process failures. The diversity of state estimation techniques resulting from intrinsic differences in chemical process systems makes it difficult to select the proper technique from a theoretical or practical point of view for design and implementation in specific applications. Hence, in this paper, we review the applications of recent observers to chemical process systems and classify them into six classes, which differentiate them with respect to their features and assists in the design of observers. Furthermore, we provide guidelines in designing and choosing the observers for particular applications, and we discuss the future directions for these observers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Luenberger-based observers are well-suited for infinite-dimensional systems when the system parameters are perfectly known.[27]”
From Optimal control of axial dispersion tubular reactors with recycle: Addressing state‐delay through transport PDEs (2025) · cites this paper as [27]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to the Kalman Filter
Welch, G., & Bishop, G. (1995) · CiteSeer X (The Pennsylvania State University) · Cited by 4,895
An Introduction to Infinite-Dimensional Linear Systems Theory
Curtain, R. F., & Zwart, H. J. (1995) · Texts in applied mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4224-6 · Cited by 3,325
Luenberger, D. G. (1971) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1971.1099826 · Cited by 2,714
Nonlinear controllability and observability
Hermann, R., & Krener, A. (1977) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1977.1101601 · Cited by 2,374 · cited 1×
“Extensive discussions on observability and detectability can be found in various references (Astolfi and Praly, 2006; Evangelisti, 2011; Hermann and Krener, 1977; Moreno and Dochain, 2008; Soroush, 1997; Zuazua, 2007).”
BackgroundObservers for multivariable systems
Luenberger, D. (1966) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1966.1098323 · Cited by 1,763
Observing the State of a Linear System
Luenberger, D. G. (1964) · IEEE Transactions on Military Electronics · doi:10.1109/tme.1964.4323124 · Cited by 1,698
(2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-387-28154-1_8 · Cited by 1,550
On-line Estimation and Adaptive Control of Bioreactors
Bastin, G., & Dochain, D. (1990) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-12088-3 · Cited by 1,173
Self-citation尾形, 克. (1995) · Prentice-Hall International eBooks · Cited by 1,137
On-line estimation and adaptive control of bioreactors
Bastin, G., & Dochain, D. (1991) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0003-2670(00)82585-4 · Cited by 861
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 215 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- D’Attellis, 1997, Nonlinear observers. Nonlinear analysis: theory, Methods Appl, 30, 3891
- Daum, 2005, Nonlinear filters: beyond the Kalman filter. Aerospace and electronic systems magazine, IEEE, 20, 57
Cited by
Sorted by citations
All you need to know about model predictive control for buildings
Drgoňa, J., Arroyo, J., Cupeiro Figueroa, I., Blum, D., Arendt, K., Kim, D., Ollé, E. P., Oravec, J., Wetter, M., Vrabie, D. L., et al. (2020) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.09.001 · Cited by 1,020
Adegboye, M. A., Fung, W.-K., & Karnik, A. U. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19112548 · Cited by 493
Optimization strategies for Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) application: A literature survey
Ramadhani, F., Hussain, M. A., Mokhlis, H., & Hajimolana, Y. S. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.052 · Cited by 342
Self-citationNor, N. M., Hassan, C. R. C., & Hussain, M. A. (2019) · Reviews in Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1515/revce-2017-0069 · Cited by 248
Self-citationBioprocessing in the Digital Age: The Role of Process Models
Narayanan, H., Luna, M. F., von Stosch, M., Bournazou, M. N. C., Polotti, G., Morbidelli, M., Butté, A., & Sokolov, M. (2019) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.201900172 · Cited by 254
Observer design for continuous-time dynamical systems
Bernard, P., Andrieu, V., & Astolfi, D. (2022) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2021.11.002 · Cited by 187
Xu, Q. (2017) · IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · doi:10.1109/tmech.2017.2701417 · Cited by 167
Ali, J. M., Hussain, M. A., Tadé, M. O., & Zhang, J. (2015) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.03.023 · Cited by 155
Self-citationYuan, J., Mao, W., Hu, C., Zheng, J., Zheng, D., & Yang, Y. (2023) · Engineering Failure Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107060 · Cited by 131
A survey on model-based fault diagnosis for linear discrete time-varying systems
Zhong, M., Xue, T., & Ding, S. X. (2018) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.04.037 · Cited by 110
Narayanan, H., Behle, L., Luna, M. F., Sokolov, M., Guillén‐Gosálbez, G., Morbidelli, M., & Butté, A. (2020) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.27437 · Cited by 85
Model-Based Methods in the Biopharmaceutical Process Lifecycle
Kröll, P., Hofer, A., Ulonska, S., Kager, J., & Herwig, C. (2017) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-017-2308-y · Cited by 76
Nor, N. M., Hussain, M. A., & Hassan, C. R. C. (2017) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2017.09.019 · Cited by 62
Self-citationAdvanced process control for ultrafiltration membrane water treatment system
Chew, C. M., Aroua, M. K., & Hussain, M. A. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.075 · Cited by 58
Self-citationA study on model predictive control in paste thickeners with rake torque constraint
Tan, C. K., Bao, J., & Bickert, G. (2017) · Minerals Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2017.01.011 · Cited by 56
Comprehensive Review of Models and Methods for Inferences in Bio-Chemical Reaction Networks
Loskot, P., Atitey, K., & Mihaylova, L. S. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00549 · Cited by 50
Yoo, H., & Gajić, Z. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2018.2814920 · Cited by 47
Comparison of fault detection and isolation methods: A review
Thirumarimurugan, M., Bagyalakshmi, N., & Paarkavi, P. (2016) · International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control · doi:10.1109/isco.2016.7726957 · Cited by 46
Machine-learning-based state estimation and predictive control of nonlinear processes
Alhajeri, M. S., Wu, Z., Rincón, D., Albalawi, F., & Christofides, P. D. (2021) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2021.01.009 · Cited by 46
Numerical study of pipeline leak detection for gas-liquid stratified flow
Adegboye, M. A., Karnik, A. U., & Fung, W.-K. (2021) · Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104054 · Cited by 46
Kager, J., Herwig, C., & Stelzer, I. V. (2017) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2017.11.049 · Cited by 43
Review of Soft Sensors in Anaerobic Digestion Process
Yan, P., Gai, M., Wang, Y., & Gao, X. (2021) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr9081434 · Cited by 42
Kager, J., Tuveri, A., Ulonska, S., Kröll, P., & Herwig, C. (2019) · Process Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2019.11.023 · Cited by 42
Destro, F., Facco, P., García‐Muñoz, S., Bezzo, F., & Barolo, M. (2020) · Journal of Process Control · doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2020.06.002 · Cited by 42
Challenges and Opportunities on Nonlinear State Estimation of Chemical and Biochemical Processes
Alexander, R., Campani, G., Dinh, S., & Lima, F. V. (2020) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr8111462 · Cited by 45
Road traffic density estimation and congestion detection with a hybrid observer-based strategy
Zeroual, A., Harrou, F., & Sun, Y. (2018) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.12.039 · Cited by 41
A novel multiple rule sets data classification algorithm based on ant colony algorithm
Liang, Z., Sun, J., Lin, Q., Du, Z., Chen, J., & Ming, Z. (2015) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.10.046 · Cited by 40
Adaptive Observer Based Control for Rooftop Solar PV System
Shah, P., & Singh, B. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2019.2898038 · Cited by 40
Design of Adaptive Observer-Based Backstepping Control of Cart-Pole Pendulum System
Humaidi, A. J., Tala'at, E. N., Hameed, M. R., & Hameed, A. H. (2019) · International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT) · doi:10.1109/icecct.2019.8869179 · Cited by 40
Fermentation: Metabolism, Kinetic Models, and Bioprocessing
González-Figueredo, C., Flores–Estrella, R. A., & Rojas‐Rejón, Ó. A. (2019) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.82195 · Cited by 38
On-line estimation of VFA concentration in anaerobic digestion via methane outflow rate measurements
Lara‐Cisneros, G., Aguilar‐López, R., Dochain, D., & Femat, R. (2016) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.07.005 · Cited by 34
Self-citationFlexible process operation for electrified chemical plants
Cegla, M., Semrau, R., Tamagnini, F., & Engell, S. (2023) · Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.coche.2023.100898 · Cited by 33
Trinh, H. M., & Huong, D. C. (2018) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/j.jfranklin.2017.12.030 · Cited by 31
Decentralized scheme for leaks’ location in a branched pipeline
Verde, C., Torres, L., & González, O. M. (2016) · Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries · doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2016.03.023 · Cited by 30
García-Mañas, F., Guzmán, J. L., Berenguel, M., & Acién, F. G. (2019) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2018.11.009 · Cited by 29
Evaluation of a Combined MHE-NMPC Approach to Handle Plant-Model Mismatch in a Rotary Tablet Press
Huang, Y.-S., Sheriff, M. Z., Bachawala, S., Gonzalez, M., Nagy, Z. K., & Reklaitis, G. V. (2021) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr9091612 · Cited by 29
State Estimators in Soft Sensing and Sensor Fusion for Sustainable Manufacturing
McAfee, M., Kariminejad, M., Weinert, A., Huq, S., Stigter, J. D., & Tormey, D. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14063635 · Cited by 29
Chae, S. H., Kim, Y. M., Park, H., Seo, J., Lim, S. J., & Kim, J. H. (2019) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en12020243 · Cited by 28
Brahmi, B., Saad, M., Rahman, M. H., & Brahmi, A. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · doi:10.1109/tcst.2019.2931522 · Cited by 27
Rapaport, A., & Dochain, D. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2019.2940870 · Cited by 26
Self-citationAdvances in monitoring and control of refolding kinetics combining PAT and modeling
Pauk, J. N., Raju Palanisamy, J., Kager, J., Koczka, K., Berghammer, G., Herwig, C., & Veiter, L. (2021) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-021-11151-y · Cited by 25
Advanced methodologies for model-based optimization and control of pharmaceutical processes
Destro, F., Inguva, P., Srisuma, P., & Braatz, R. D. (2024) · Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.coche.2024.101035 · Cited by 25
A new framework of global sensitivity analysis for the chemical kinetic model using PSO-BPNN
An, J., He, G., Qin, F., Li, R., & Huang, Z. (2018) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.02.003 · Cited by 25
Generic Model Control (GMC) in Multistage Flash (MSF) Desalination
Alsadaie, S. M., & Mujtaba, I. M. (2016) · Journal of Process Control · doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2016.05.006 · Cited by 25
Comparison of Particle Filter and Extended Kalman Filter Algorithms for Monitoring of Bioprocesses
Stelzer, I. V., Kager, J., & Herwig, C. (2017) · Computer-aided chemical engineering/Computer aided chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63965-3.50249-x · Cited by 25
State observers for reaction systems with improved convergence rates
Ortega, R. S., Bobtsov, A. A., Dochain, D., & Nikolaev, N. (2019) · Journal of Process Control · doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2019.08.003 · Cited by 22
Self-citationA discrete‐time nonlinear state observer for the anaerobic digestion process
Draa, K. C., Zemouche, A., Alma, M., Voos, H., & Darouach, M. (2018) · International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · doi:10.1002/rnc.4434 · Cited by 22
Vulnerabilities of Control Systems in Internet of Things Applications
Radisavljević-Gajić, V., Park, S., & Chasaki, D. (2017) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2787962 · Cited by 21
Alvarado‐Santos, E., Mata-Machuca, J. L., Pérez, P. A. L., Moctezuma, R. G., Pérez‐Guevara, F., & Aguilar‐López, R. (2022) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation8090446 · Cited by 20
Observer design for a nano-positioning system using neural, fuzzy and ANFIS networks
Bayat, S., Pishkenari, H. N., & Salarieh, H. (2019) · Mechatronics · doi:10.1016/j.mechatronics.2019.02.007 · Cited by 20
A robust hybrid observer for monitoring high-cell density cultures exhibiting overflow metabolism
Bárzaga-Martell, L., Duarte‐Mermoud, M. A., Ibáñez-Espinel, F., Gamboa-Labbé, B., Saa, P. A., & Pérez‐Correa, J. R. (2021) · Journal of Process Control · doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2021.06.006 · Cited by 20
Sun, B., Jämsä‐Jounela, S., Todorov, Y. V., Olivier, L. E., & Craig, I. K. (2017) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.12.012 · Cited by 19
Multi-rate state estimation applied to a pilot-scale reactive distillation process
Haßkerl, D., Subramanian, S., Markert, S., Kaiser, S., & Engell, S. (2018) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2018.04.018 · Cited by 19
Model predictive control of a non-isothermal axial dispersion tubular reactor with recycle
Khatibi, S., Ozorio Cassol, G., & Dubljevic, S. (2021) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.107159 · Cited by 18
Multi‐rate observer design for process monitoring using asynchronous inter‐sample output predictions
Ling, C., & Kravaris, C. (2017) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.15707 · Cited by 18
Torgashov, A. Y., & Skogestad, S. (2019) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2019.08.017 · Cited by 18
Müller, D. F., Wibbing, D., Herwig, C., & Kager, J. (2023) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108203 · Cited by 17
Leong, W. Y., Trinh, H. M., & Hien, L. V. (2016) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/j.jfranklin.2016.04.017 · Cited by 17
Campani, G., Ribeiro, M. P. D. A., Zangirolami, T. C., & Lima, F. V. (2019) · Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00449-019-02143-4 · Cited by 17
Soft sensor for an orifice flowmeter in presence of disturbances
Vemulapalli, S., & Venkata, S. K. (2022) · Flow Measurement and Instrumentation · doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2022.102178 · Cited by 16
Zhao, L., Wang, J., Yu, T., Chen, K., & Su, A. (2018) · ISA Transactions · doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2018.11.004 · Cited by 16
Salehi, Y., Fatehi, A., & Nayebi, M. A. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2018.2884604 · Cited by 16
Observer and filter design for linear transport-reaction systems
Xie, J., Xu, Q., Ni, D., & Dubljevic, S. S. (2019) · European Journal of Control · doi:10.1016/j.ejcon.2019.01.005 · Cited by 16
Robust control of fed-batch high-cell density cultures: a simulation-based assessment
Ibáñez, F., Saa, P. A., Bárzaga-Martell, L., Duarte‐Mermoud, M. A., Fernández‐Fernández, M., Agosin, E. E., & Pérez‐Correa, J. R. (2021) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107545 · Cited by 15
Sinner, P., Stiegler, M., Goldbeck, O., Seibold, G. M., Herwig, C., & Kager, J. (2021) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.28001 · Cited by 12
Fermentation monitoring by Bayesian states estimators. Application to red wines elaboration
Fernández, C., Pantano, N., Rossomando, F., Amicarelli, A., & Scaglia, G. J. E. (2020) · Control Engineering Practice · doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2020.104608 · Cited by 14
Hernández-Gómez, Á., Langarica‐Cordoba, D., Martinez-Rodriguez, P. R., González-Aguilar, H., Guilbert, D., & Saldivar, B. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3400049 · Cited by 14
Traffic congestion detection based on hybrid observer and GLR test
Harrou, F., Zeroual, A., & Sun, Y. (2018) · Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · doi:10.23919/acc.2018.8431387 · Cited by 14
Pernsteiner, D., Schirrer, A., Kasper, L., Hofmann, R., & Jakubek, S. (2021) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107444 · Cited by 14
State Estimation Using Non-uniform and Delayed Information: A Review
Isaza, J. A., Botero, H., & Álvarez, H. (2018) · Machine Intelligence Research · doi:10.1007/s11633-017-1106-7 · Cited by 14
A novel nonlinear sliding mode observer to estimate biomass for lactic acid production
Pérez, P. A. L., López-López, M., Núñez-Colín, C. A., Mukhtar, H., Aguilar‐López, R., & Peña-Caballero, V. (2022) · Chemical Product and Process Modeling · doi:10.1515/cppm-2021-0074 · Cited by 13
Srisuma, P., Barbastathis, G., & Braatz, R. D. (2024) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124693 · Cited by 13
Improving operation in an industrial MDF flash dryer through physics-based NMPC
Santos, P., Pitarch, J. L., Vicente, A., de Prada, C., & García, Á. (2019) · Control Engineering Practice · doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2019.104213 · Cited by 13
Rómoli, S., Amicarelli, A., Ortiz, O. A., Scaglia, G. J. E., & di Sciascio, F. A. (2016) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.05.017 · Cited by 12
Lara‐Cisneros, G., & Dochain, D. (2018) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.8b02607 · Cited by 12
Self-citationDesign of Optimal UKF State Observer–Controller for Stochastic Dynamical Systems
Rana, R., Agarwal, V., Gaur, P., & Parthasarathy, H. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · doi:10.1109/tia.2020.3048647 · Cited by 12
Actuator fault detection using extended Kalman filter for a wastewater treatment process
Miron, M., Frangu, L., & Caraman, S. (2017) · International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC) · doi:10.1109/icstcc.2017.8107098 · Cited by 12
Vlahakis, E. E., & Halikias, G. D. (2019) · Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control · doi:10.1177/0142331219855591 · Cited by 12
Monitoring a segmented fluid bed dryer by hybrid data-driven/knowledge-driven modeling
Destro, F., Salmon, A. J., Facco, P., Pantelides, C. C., Bezzo, F., & Barolo, M. (2020) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.646 · Cited by 12
Rómoli, S., Serrano, M. E., Rossomando, F., Vega, J. R., Ortiz, O. A., & Scaglia, G. J. E. (2017) · Complexity · doi:10.1155/2017/9391879 · Cited by 12
Tuveri, A., Nakama, C. S. M., Matias, J., Holck, H. E., Jäschke, J., Imsland, L., & Bar, N. (2023) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108183 · Cited by 11
On the robustness of the soft sensors used to monitor a vial freeze-drying process
Bosca, S., Barresi, A. A., & Fissore, D. (2016) · Drying Technology · doi:10.1080/07373937.2016.1243553 · Cited by 11
Thermal Energy Correction Based Model Predictive Control for Fluid Catalytic Cracking Riser
Huang, M., Zheng, Y., Li, S., & Li, M. (2020) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.0c03632 · Cited by 11
Dynamic and sensor fault tolerant control for an intensified heat-exchanger/reactor
Han, X., Rammal, R., He, M., Li, Z., Cabassud, M., & Dahhou, B. (2022) · European Journal of Control · doi:10.1016/j.ejcon.2022.100736 · Cited by 11
Bioprocess Monitoring: A Moving Horizon Estimation Experimental Application
Tuveri, A., Holck, H. E., Nakama, C. S. M., Matias, J., Jäschke, J., Imsland, L., & Bar, N. (2022) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.07.448 · Cited by 10
Sun, B., Fan, M., Liu, G., Lv, M., Liu, S., He, M., Huang, K., & Yang, C. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2023.3263571 · Cited by 10
Physics-informed neural networks for state reconstruction of hydrogen energy transportation systems
Zhang, L., Xie, J., Xu, Q., Koch, C. R., & Dubljevic, S. S. (2024) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108898 · Cited by 10
Grijalva-Hernández, F., Peña-Caballero, V., Pérez, P. A. L., & Aguilar‐López, R. (2018) · Chemical Papers · doi:10.1007/s11696-018-0478-7 · Cited by 10
Masooleh, L. S., Arbogast, J. E., Seider, W. D., Oktem, U. G., & Soroush, M. (2021) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107544 · Cited by 13
Zhang, L., Xie, J., & Dubljevic, S. S. (2023) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108381 · Cited by 10
Pauk, J. N., Igwe, C. L., Herwig, C., & Kager, J. (2024) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2024.119774 · Cited by 10
Fluid temperature predictions of geothermal borefields using load estimations via state observers
Figueroa, I. C., Cimmino, M., Drgoňa, J., & Helsen, L. (2020) · Journal of Building Performance Simulation · doi:10.1080/19401493.2020.1838612 · Cited by 10
Astorga‐Zaragoza, C. M., Osorio-Gordillo, G. L., Reyes-Martínez, J., Madrigal-Espinosa, G., & Chadli, M. (2018) · International Journal of Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1007/s40815-018-0481-8 · Cited by 9
Hernandez, C., Velez, D., & Isaza, J. A. (2018) · Revista CINTEX · doi:10.33131/24222208.318 · Cited by 9
Sensor location for nonlinear state estimation
Rodriguez, L. P. F., Tupaz, J., & Sánchez, M. (2021) · Journal of Process Control · doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2021.02.005 · Cited by 9
Tracking of stribeck friction based on second-order linear extended state observer
Wang, L., Li, Q., Jiao, R., Yin, Y., Feng, Y., & Liu, Y. (2016) · Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC) · doi:10.1109/ccdc.2016.7531746 · Cited by 9
Unscented Kalman Filter in Gas pipeline leakage magnitude estimation and localization
Doshmanziari, R., Khaloozadeh, H., & Nikoofard, A. (2019) · International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, and Automation · doi:10.1109/iccia49288.2019.9030826 · Cited by 9
Ross, E. A., Wagterveld, R. M., Stigter, J. D., Mayer, M. J. J., & Keesman, K. J. (2023) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.108128 · Cited by 8
Optimal tracking control of artificial gas-lift process
Shi, J., Al‐Durra, A., & Boiko, I. M. (2018) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.05.011 · Cited by 8
Smooth Non Linear High Gain Observers for a Class of Dynamical Systems
Gonzalez-Prieto, J. A., & Villaverde, A. F. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3137650 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohd Ali, J., Ha Hoang, N., Hussain, M. A., & Dochain, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Malaya (MY)
- UCLouvain (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Hussain, M.A.
- Venue
- Computers & Chemical Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 76
- Pages
- 27-41
- ISSN
- 0098-1354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034764524
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 215
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 23.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers & Chemical Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- The University of Malaya Research Repository (University of Malaya) (acceptedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Malaya
- Ministry of Higher Education in Malaysia
- Viet Nam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) (104.99-2014.74)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
- Keywords
- state observer, state estimation, chemical process systems, observer design, sensor replacement, state feedback control, process fault detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review