Cited by 18Advanced Control Systems OptimizationControl Systems and IdentificationStability and Controllability of Differential Equations

Model predictive control of a non-isothermal axial dispersion tubular reactor with recycle

Khatibi, Seyedhamidreza, Ozorio Cassol, Guilherme, Dubljevic, Stevan·2021·Computers & Chemical Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.107159

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khatibi, S., Ozorio Cassol, G., & Dubljevic, S.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Dubljevic, Stevan
Venue
Computers & Chemical Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
145
Pages
107159
ISSN
0098-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3095814987
Cited by
18
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Chemical Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Alberta
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations
Keywords
model predictive control, axial dispersion, recycle streams, output feedback control, Crank-Nicolson discretization, state and input constraints, disturbance rejection, state estimation, distributed parameter systems, Peclet number

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review