Cited by 69Literacy, Media, and EducationDigital Media and PhilosophyLibrary Science and Information Literacy

The algorithms know me and I know them: Using student journals to uncover algorithmic literacy awareness

Koenig, Abby·2020·Computers and Composition

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102611

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies have suggested that students' algorithmic literacy skills were too low.

    “Recent studies have suggested that students' algorithmic literacy skills were too low (Brodsky et al., 2020;Head et al., 2020;Koenig, 2020;Powers, 2017).”

    From Expanding on the Frames: Making a Case for Algorithmic Literacy (2023) · cites this paper as Koenig, 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koenig, A.
Affiliations
University of Louisville (US)
Corresponding author
Koenig, Abby
Venue
Computers and Composition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
58
Pages
102611
ISSN
  • 1873-2011 (ISSN-L)
  • 8755-4615
OpenAlex
W3101508391
Cited by
69
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5
FWCI
57.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & composition/Computers and composition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
Keywords
algorithmic literacy, algorithmic platforms, student journals, rhetorical awareness, digital communication practices, self-reflection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review