A descriptive model of information problem solving while using internet

Open access

Brand-Gruwel, Saskia, Wopereis, Iwan, Walraven, Amber·2009·Computers & Education

DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.004

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.004

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS): Measuring Undergraduates’ Evaluation of Scientific Information and Arguments
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026 · Cited by 437
Promoting Integration of Multiple Texts: a Review of Instructional Approaches and Practices
Barzilai, S., Zohar, A. R., & Mor-Hagani, S. (2018) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-018-9436-8 · Cited by 176
Toward an Integrated Framework of Multiple Text Use
List, A., & Alexander, P. A. (2019) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2018.1505514 · Cited by 147
An empirical approach to understanding users' fake news identification on social media
Aoun Barakat, K., Dabbous, A., & Tarhini, A. (2021) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-08-2020-0333 · Cited by 80
Assessing university students’ critical online reasoning ability: a conceptual and assessment framework with preliminary evidence
Molerov, D., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Nagel, M.-T., Brückner, S., Schmidt, S., & Shavelson, R. J. (2020) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2020.577843 · Cited by 70
Making sources visible: Promoting multiple document literacy with digital epistemic scaffolds
Barzilai, S., Mor-Hagani, S., Zohar, A. R., Shlomi-Elooz, T., & Ben-Yishai, R. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103980 · Cited by 49
Investigation of High School Students’ Online Science Information Searching Performance: The Role of Implicit and Explicit Strategies
Tsai, M.-J., Hsu, C.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2012) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9307-2 · Cited by 47
Comparing marginal effects of Chilean students' economic, social and cultural status on digital versus reading and mathematics performance
Claro, M., Cabello, T., San Martín, E., & Nussbaum, M. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.018 · Cited by 42
Untangling Critical Interaction with AI in Students’ Written Assessment
Shibani, A., Knight, S., Kitto, K., Karunanayake, A., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2024) · Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613905.3651083 · Cited by 35
A Vision for University Biology Education for Non-science Majors
Gormally, C., & Heil, A. (2022) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.21-12-0338 · Cited by 28
Validation of newly developed tasks for the assessment of generic critical online reasoning (COR) of university students and graduates
Nagel, M.-T., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., & Fischer, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.914857 · Cited by 27
Supporting Metacognition during Exploratory Search with the OrgBox
Crescenzi, A., Ward, A. R., Li, Y., & Capra, R. (2021) · Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3404835.3462955 · Cited by 25
Ecological momentary assessment of digital literacy: Influence of fluid and crystallized intelligence, domain-specific knowledge, and computer usage
Moehring, A., Schroeders, U., Leichtmann, B., & Wilhelm, O. (2016) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2016.10.003 · Cited by 16
Investigation of students' use of online information in higher education using eye tracking
Kunz, A.-K., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Schmidt, S., Nagel, M.-T., & Brückner, S. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00333-6 · Cited by 12
AI humanizers and the crisis of information integrity: implications for scientific writing
Giray, L. (2026) · Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00210-026-05200-4 · Cited by 5
The DIPS model: GenAI integration in digital information problem solving by experts and novices
Boetje, J., de Graaf, Z., Wopereis, I., van Ginkel, S. O., Smakman, M. H. J., Versendaal, J., & Barendsen, E. (2026) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105677 · Cited by 1
Self-citation

Authors: Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Walraven, A.
Venue: Computers & Education
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2009-12
Volume: 53
Issue: 4
Pages: 1207-1217
ISSN: 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.004
OpenAlex: W2151565993
Cited by: 335
References: 0
FWCI: 37.25
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review