Cited by 147Educational Strategies and EpistemologiesVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Toward an Integrated Framework of Multiple Text Use

List, Alexandra, Alexander, Patricia A.·2019·Educational Psychologist

Abstract

We introduce the Integrated Framework of Multiple Texts to understand how students use and form connections between multiple texts to accomplish personal or task goals. The Integrated Framework of Multiple Texts conceptualizes students’ multiple text use as unfolding over the course of three stages—preparation, execution, and production. In the preparation stage of the framework, individual difference factors and students’ task analysis result in learners’ adoption of a default stance, or a general orientation, toward multiple text use. During the execution stage of the framework, students engage in a variety of behavioral, cognitive, and metacognitive/regulatory strategies to develop cross-textual links and to integrate information across multiple texts. The execution stage concludes with students’ development of a variety of affective and cognitive outcomes as a consequence of text access. Finally, in the production stage of the framework, students draw on these affective and cognitive outcomes to develop external, often written products.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00461520.2018.1505514

Cites

168 of 168 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • List and Alexander (2019) argued that students may demonstrate four levels of integration when forming connections across texts: relational identification, separate representation, simultaneous relation, and relational elaboration.

    “List and Alexander (2019) argued that students might demonstrate four levels of integration, or integrative reasoning, when forming connections across texts, i.e. level 1, relational identification; level 2, separate representation; level 3, simultaneous relation; level 4, relational elaboration.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 169 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Ajzen I., 2005, The handbook of attitudes, 173
  2. Britt M. A., 1999, Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso, 209
  3. Coiro J, 2003, The Reading Teacher, 56, 458
  4. Facione P. A., 1995, The Journal of General Education, 1, 25
  5. Hargittai E., 2010, International Journal of Communication, 4, 468
  6. Meyer B. J., 2011, International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4, 127
  7. Petty R. E., 1991, International series in experimental social psychology. Emotion and social judgments, 181
  8. Willingham D. T, 2007, American Educator, 31, 8

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
List, A., & Alexander, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methods, University of Maryland
Corresponding author
Alexander, Patricia A.
Venue
Educational Psychologist
Published
2018-11-05
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
20-39
ISSN
  • 0046-1520 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6985
OpenAlex
W2900296039
Cited by
147
References
169
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 10 · 2013: 1
FWCI
23.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Psychologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
text integration, individual differences, task analysis, metacognitive strategies, regulatory strategy, affective learning outcomes, written expression, reading comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review