Cited by 336Technology Adoption and User BehaviourOnline and Blended LearningEducational Technology and E-Learning

The effects of education compatibility and technological expectancy on e-learning acceptance

Chen, Jian-Liang·2011·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.009

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The questionnaire was specifically designed for this study and informed by a review of relevant literature and existing questionnaires on teachers' and students' perceptions of educational technologies based on the EVT framework.

    “The questionnaire was specifically designed for the purposes of this study.It was informed by a review of relevant literature and existing questionnaires on teachers' and students' perceptions of educational technologies based on the EVT framework (e.g., Backfisch et al., 2021aBackfisch et al., , 2021b;;Ball et al., 2019;Chen, 2011;Ranellucci et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, J.-L.
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
1501-1511
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979929739
Cited by
336
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 98 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
93.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
Keywords
e-learning acceptance, UTAUT, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, behavioral intention, learning behavior, information system acceptance, technology adoption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review