Cited by 159Innovative Teaching MethodsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies

Implementing flipped classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system into learning process

Mohamed, Hafidi, Lamia, Mahnane·2018·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.011

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mohamed, H., & Lamia, M.
Affiliations
Badji Mokhtar-Annaba University (DZ)
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
124
Pages
62-76
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2803876593
Cited by
159
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7
FWCI
55.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Keywords
flipped classroom, intelligent tutoring systems, Internet of Things, student motivation, continuance intention, perceived usefulness, self-efficacy, compatibility, perceived support, social ties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review