Cited by 162EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEnglish Language Learning and Teaching

The Effect of Computer-Assisted Cooperative Learning Methods and Group Size on the EFL Learners’ Achievement in Communication Skills

AbuSeileek, Ali Farhan·2012·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.011

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
AbuSeileek, A. F.
Affiliations
Al al-Bayt University (JO)
Corresponding author
AbuSeileek, Ali Farhan
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
231-239
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994588611
Cited by
162
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
63.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
group size, positive interdependence, individual accountability, English as a foreign language, speaking skills, writing skills, communication skills, identity disclosure, computer-mediated communication, language anxiety, undergraduate students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review