CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 103

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effectiveness of a one-year online mentoring program for girls in STEM

Stoeger, Heidrun, Duan, Xiaoju, Schirner, Sigrun, Greindl, Teresa, Ziegler, Albert·2013·Computers & Education
DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.032
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.032

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Agars, 2004, Reconsidering the impact of gender stereotypes on the advancement of women in organizations, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 103, 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00127.x · DOI
  2. Allen, 2004, Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: a meta-analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 127, 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.127 · DOI
  3. Bussey, 1999, Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation, Psychological Review, 106, 676, 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.676 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Cheryan, 2012, Enduring influences of stereotypical computer science role models on women's academic aspirations, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 72, 10.1177/0361684312459328 · DOI
  5. Cook, 2004, Beyond formal learning: informal community elearning, Computers and Education, 43, 35, 10.1016/j.compedu.2003.12.003 · DOI
  6. Dasgupta, 2011, Ingroup experts and peers as social vaccines who inoculate the self-concept: the stereotype inoculation model, Psychological Inquiry, 22, 231, 10.1080/1047840X.2011.607313 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Deaux, 1998, Gender, Vol. 1, 788
  8. Deaux, 1984, Structure of gender stereotypes: interrelationships among components and gender label, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991, 10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.991 · DOI
  9. Döring, 2003, Vol. 2
  10. Eby, 2008, Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and nonmentored individuals, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 254, 10.1016/j.jvb.2007.04.005 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Eccles, 1994, Understanding women's educational and occupational choices: applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices, Psychology of Woman Quarterly, 18, 585, 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01049.x · DOI
  12. Eccles, 1989, Self-concepts, domain values, and self-esteem: relations and changes at early adolescence, Journal of Personality, 57, 283, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00484.x · DOI
  13. Ensher, 2003, Online mentoring and computer-mediated communication: new directions in research, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 264, 10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00044-7 · DOI
  14. Evans, 1995, The effect of a role model project upon the attitudes of ninth-grade science students, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 195, 10.1002/tea.3660320208 · DOI
  15. Friedman, 2004, Telementoring as a collaborative agent for change, Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3
  16. Halpern, 2007, The science of sex differences in science and mathematics, Psychological Science in Public Interest, 8, 1, 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x · DOI
  17. Kerr, 2004, Encouraging talented girls in math and science: effects of a guidance intervention, High Ability Studies, 15, 85, 10.1080/1359813042000225357 · DOI
  18. Martell, 1996, Male-female differences: a computer simulation, American Psychologist, 51, 157, 10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.157 · DOI
  19. O'Neill, 2011, Trade-offs between perceptions of success and planned outcomes in an online mentoring program, Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 19, 45, 10.1080/13611267.2011.543570 · DOI
  20. Papastergiou, 2008, Are computer science and information technology still masculine fields? High school students' perceptions and career choices, Computers and Education, 51, 594, 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.009 · DOI
  21. Parks, 1998, “Making MOOsic”: the development of personal relationships on line and a comparison to their off-line counterparts, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 517, 10.1177/0265407598154005 · DOI
  22. Penny, 2009, eMentoring: connecting teacher candidates with k–12 students from urban schools, International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 5, 169
  23. Richards, 2001, Subtyping and subgrouping: processes for the prevention and promotion of stereotype change, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 52, 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0501_4 · DOI
  24. Sáinz, 2010, Gender differences in computer attitudes and the choice of technology-related occupations in a sample of secondary students in Spain, Computers and Education, 54, 578, 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.007 · DOI
  25. Segall, 2000, Online shrinks: the inside story, Psychology Today, 32, 38
  26. Smith, 1986, Effect of women science career role models on early adolescents’ attitudes toward scientists and women in science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 667, 10.1002/tea.3660230802 · DOI
  27. Spencer, 1999, Stereotype threat and women's math performance, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 4
  28. Stelle, 1997, A threat in the air: how stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance, American Psychologist, 52, 613, 10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Underhill, 2006, The effectiveness of mentoring programs in corporate settings: a meta-analytical review of the literature, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 292, 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.05.003 · DOI
  30. Walberg, 1984, Improving productivity of America's schools, Educational Leadership, 41, 19
  31. Ziegler, 2010, Standards for field evaluations of modifications to educational settings, Problems of Evaluation in the 21st Century, 20, 156

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stoeger, H., Duan, X., Schirner, S., Greindl, T., & Ziegler, A.
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
69
Pages
408-418
ISSN
0360-1315
DOI
10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.032
Cited by
103
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review