Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis.
Abstract
A gender gap in mathematics achievement persists in some nations but not in others. In light of the underrepresentation of women in careers in science, technology, mathematics, and engineering, increasing research attention is being devoted to understanding gender differences in mathematics achievement, attitudes, and affect. The gender stratification hypothesis maintains that such gender differences are closely related to cultural variations in opportunity structures for girls and women. We meta-analyzed 2 major international data sets, the 2003 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study and the Programme for International Student Assessment, representing 493,495 students 14-16 years of age, to estimate the magnitude of gender differences in mathematics achievement, attitudes, and affect across 69 nations throughout the world. Consistent with the gender similarities hypothesis, all of the mean effect sizes in mathematics achievement were very small (d < 0.15); however, national effect sizes showed considerable variability (ds = -0.42 to 0.40). Despite gender similarities in achievement, boys reported more positive math attitudes and affect (ds = 0.10 to 0.33); national effect sizes ranged from d = -0.61 to 0.89. In contrast to those of previous tests of the gender stratification hypothesis, our results point to specific domains of gender equity responsible for gender gaps in math. Gender equity in school enrollment, women's share of research jobs, and women's parl…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evidence for social-structural theory exists for several psychological gender differences, including mate preferences, mathematics performance, and some aspects of sexuality.
“Evidence for this theory exists for several psychological gender differences, including mate preferences, mathematics performance, and some aspects of sexuality”
From Gender Differences in Depression in Representative National Samples: Meta-Analyses of Diagnoses and Symptoms (2017) · cites this paper as Else-Quest et al., 2010
Other studies have found smaller gender differences in nations with more gender inequality for outcomes such as self-reports of personality traits and attitudes about mathematics.
“However, other studies have found smaller gender differences in nations with more gender inequality. This pattern has been found for outcomes such as self-reports of personality traits and attitudes about mathematics”
From Gender Differences in Depression in Representative National Samples: Meta-Analyses of Diagnoses and Symptoms (2017) · cites this paper as Else-Quest et al., 2010
The Hedges and Nowell strategy has been used in other meta-analyses on gender differences in cognitive abilities.
“The Hedges and Nowell strategy has since been used in other meta-analyses on gender differences in cognitive abilities”
From Gender Differences in Depression in Representative National Samples: Meta-Analyses of Diagnoses and Symptoms (2017) · cites this paper as Else-Quest et al., 2010
For objective measures such as mathematics performance or ratings of others such as mate preferences, the gender gap is smaller in more equitable nations.
“For objective measures such as mathematics performance, or for ratings of others such as mate preferences, the gender gap is smaller in more equitable nations (e.g., Else-Quest et al., 2010; Zentner & Mitura, 2012).”
From Gender Differences in Depression in Representative National Samples: Meta-Analyses of Diagnoses and Symptoms (2017) · cites this paper as Else-Quest et al., 2010
In general, males performed at a higher level in Math, and this holds true for both young and old, although sex differences are lacking in data from TIMSS.
“In general, males performed at a higher level in Math, and this holds true for both young and old (Dickerson et al., 2015; Else-Quest et al., 2010; Marks, 2008; Stoet & Geary, 2013, 2015; Tao & Michalopoulos, 2018; van Hek et al., 2017; Weber et al., 2014), although sex differences are lacking in data from TIMSS (Else-Quest et al., 2010).”
From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Else-Quest et al., 2010
The results of Else-Quest et al. (2010) show that the nonsignificant overall sex difference becomes a female advantage in countries with higher living conditions.
“Hence, the larger effect in Else-Quest et al. (2010) indicates that the nonsignificant overall sex difference becomes a female advantage in countries with higher living conditions.”
From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Else-Quest et al., 2010
Females reported higher levels of internalizing emotions such as guilt, shame, crying, and fear than males, with SMDs of 0.12-1.11.
“Regarding Negative emotions, females reported higher levels of internalizing emotions, such as guilt, shame, crying, and fear (SMDs = 0.12–1.11; Chaplin & Aldao, 2013; Else-Quest et al., 2010; Fischer et al., 2004; van Hemert et al., 2011)”
From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Else-Quest et al., 2010
Males show higher Self-concept STEM than females, with SMDs of 0.10-0.33.
“Considering both the old analyses and new analyses, we found that males show higher Self-concept STEM (SMDs = 0.10–0.33; Else-Quest et al., 2010; Goldman & Penner, 2016; Huang, 2013; Stoet & Geary, 2018).”
From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Else-Quest et al., 2010
In old analyses, 13 analyses indicated that sex differences in Self-concept STEM are smaller in societies with higher living conditions.
“By contrast, there are 13 analyses in the old analyses that indicated that these sex differences are smaller (Else-Quest et al., 2010)”
From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Else-Quest et al., 2010
In old analyses using PISA or TIMSS, 19 analyses showed associations suggesting that sex differences in Self-concept STEM are larger in societies with higher living conditions.
“there are 19 analyses in the old analyses that showed associations suggesting that sex differences are larger in societies with higher living conditions (Else-Quest et al., 2010; Goldman & Penner, 2016; Stoet & Geary, 2018).”
From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Else-Quest et al., 2010
Cites
Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis.
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.486 · Cited by 2,977 · see citing works
Schmitt, D. P., Realo, A., Voracek, M., & Allik, J. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168 · Cited by 1,391 · see citing works
Culture, gender, and the self: Variations and impact of social comparison processes.
Guimond, S., Branscombe, N. R., Brunot, S., Buunk, A. P., Chatard, A., Désert, M., Garcia, D. M., Haque, S., Martinot, D., & Yzerbyt, V. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1118 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Salk, R. H., Hyde, J. S., & Abramson, L. Y. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000102 · Cited by 2,622 · see citing works
“The Hedges and Nowell strategy has since been used in other meta-analyses on gender differences in cognitive abilities (e.g., Else-Quest et al., 2010; Reilly, Neumann, & Andrews, 2015).”
Self-citationWhy are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000052 · Cited by 1,259 · see citing works
The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617741719 · Cited by 1,054 · see citing works
Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021385 · Cited by 1,050 · see citing works
Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. (2013) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001 · Cited by 837 · see citing works
Mathematics anxiety: what have we learned in 60 years?
Dowker, A., Sarkar, A., & Looi, C. Y. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00508 · Cited by 811 · see citing works
Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2012) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394281-4.00002-7 · Cited by 770 · see citing works
A meta-analysis of the relation between math anxiety and math achievement
Barroso, C., Ganley, C. M., McGraw, A. L., Geer, E. A., Hart, S. A., & Daucourt, M. C. (2021) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000307 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
Miller, D. I., Eagly, A. H., & Linn, M. C. (2015) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000005 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Self-citationDasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732214549471 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis
Flore, P. C., & Wicherts, J. M. (2015) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2014.10.002 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
The relationship between math anxiety and math performance: a meta-analytic investigation
Zhang, J., Zhao, N., & Kong, Q. P. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01613 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Hill, F., Mammarella, I. C., Devine, A., Caviola, S., Passolunghi, M. C., & Szűcs, D. (2016) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.006 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
The reality and evolutionary significance of human psychological sex differences
Archer, J. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12507 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Smith, J. L., Lewis, K. L., Hawthorne, L., & Hodges, S. D. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167212468332 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Gender differences in individual variation in academic grades fail to fit expected patterns for STEM
O’Dea, R. E., Lagisz, M., Jennions, M. D., & Nakagawa, S. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06292-0 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, economic, or social equality
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2015) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2014.11.006 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Sex Differences in Spatial Cognition: Advancing the Conversation
Levine, S. C., Foley, A., Lourenco, S., Ehrlich, S., & Ratliff, K. (2016) · WIREs Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1380 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
What did you do yesterday? A meta-analysis of sex differences in episodic memory.
Asperholm, M., Högman, N., Rafi, J., & Herlitz, A. (2019) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000197 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Grigg, S., Perera, H. N., McIlveen, P., & Svetleff, Z. (2018) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.007 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Nivette, A., Sutherland, A., Eisner, M., & Murray, J. (2019) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.21799 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Rosenthal, L., Levy, S. R., London, B., Lobel, M., & Bazile, C. (2013) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0257-9 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
“…career identities has been found to be a key variable that predicts better performance and greater interest in remaining in non-traditional fields (e.g., Settles 2004; also see Cheryan et al. 2009; Eccles 2005; Else-Quest et al. 2010 internationally; Good et al. 2008; Shapiro and Williams 2012).”
Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., Guo, J., Arens, A. K., & Murayama, K. (2016) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000146 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Men, women and STEM: Why the differences and what should be done?
Stewart-Williams, S., & Halsey, L. G. (2021) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/0890207020962326 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Sex/gender differences in cognitive abilities
Kheloui, S., Jacmin-Park, S., Larocque, O., Kerr, P., Rossi, M., Cartier, L., & Juster, R.-P. (2023) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105333 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Educational Systems and Gender Differences in Reading: A Comparative Multilevel Analysis
van Hek, M., Buchmann, C., & Kraaykamp, G. (2019) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcy054 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Blended learning and traditional learning: a comparative study of college mechanics courses
Bazelais, P., & Doleck, T. (2018) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-018-9748-9 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox
Herlitz, A., Hönig, I., Hedebrant, K., & Asperholm, M. (2025) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231202685 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“Six studies in the old analyses used data from PISA (2000–2012) and TIMSS (2003).”
InfluentialAsperholm, M., Nagar, S., Dekhtyar, S., & Herlitz, A. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0214945 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Tsaousis, I., & Alghamdi, M. H. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896638 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
The Effects of ALEKS on Mathematics Learning in K-12 and Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis
Sun, S., Else-Quest, N. M., Hodges, L. C., French, A. M., & Dowling, R. (2021) · Investigations in Mathematics Learning · doi:10.1080/19477503.2021.1926194 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationSimpson’s gender-equality paradox
Berggren, M., & Bergh, R. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2422247122 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Trajectories in quantitative and humanities self-efficacy during the first year of college
Han, J., Usher, E. L., & Brown, C. S. (2021) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102054 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Block, K., olsson, M. I. T., Schmader, T., van Laar, C., Martiny, S. E., Schuster, C., Van Grootel, S., Meeussen, L., & Croft, A. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/k6g5d · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C.
- Affiliations
- Villanova University (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-127
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2012805784
- Cited by
- 1,630
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 108 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 124 · 2022: 119 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 169 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 102 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 108 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 85 · 2012: 64
- FWCI
- 88.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2010-03-01)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (REC 0635444)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Keywords
- gender differences in mathematics, gender equity, student attitudes toward mathematics, TIMSS, PISA, student enrollment, women's parliamentary representation, girls' agency
- MeSH terms
- Achievement, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Mathematics, Sex Factors, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review