The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing marginal effects of Chilean students' economic, social and cultural status on digital versus reading and mathematics performance
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The results showed that the effect of SES was even stronger for ICT literacy achievement.”
From Taking a future perspective by learning from the past – A systematic review of assessment instruments that aim to measure primary and secondary school students' ICT literacy (2016) · cites this paper as Claro et al., 2015
Citations
Cites
An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias
Zellner, A. (1962) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1962.10480664 · Cited by 8,401
Socioeconomic status and child development
Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233 · Cited by 5,484
Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research
Sirin, S. R. (2005) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543075003417 · Cited by 4,687 · cited 4×
“This is because research has found evidence to suggest that factors such as educational resources at home, as well as the family's social and cultural capital also influence student's educational outcomes (Buchmann, 2002; Sirin, 2005; Sullivan, 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialFrom Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development
(2000) · doi:10.17226/9824 · Cited by 4,484
Equality of Educational Opportunity.
Sewell, W. H., Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091094 · Cited by 2,753
Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings
van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2006) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004 · Cited by 2,046
The digital divide shifts to differences in usage
van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2014) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444813487959 · Cited by 1,733
Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet Skills and Uses among Members of the “Net Generation”
Hargittai, E. (2010) · Sociological Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1475-682x.2009.00317.x · Cited by 1,564
Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the Digital Divide
Selwyn, N. (2004) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444804042519 · Cited by 1,437
DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe.
(2013) · Joint Research Centre (European Commission) · doi:10.2788/52966 · Cited by 1,394
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Warschauer, 2012, The digital divide and social inclusion, Americas Quarterly
Cited by
Scheerder, A., van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2017) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007 · Cited by 1,471
Siddiq, F., Hatlevik, O. E., Olsen, R. V., Throndsen, I., & Scherer, R. (2016) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.05.002 · Cited by 269
Intended and Unintended Consequences of Educational Technology on Social Inequality
Tawfik, A. A., Reeves, T. D., & Stich, A. (2016) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-016-0109-5 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Claro, M., Cabello, T., San Martín, E., & Nussbaum, M.
- ORCID
- Claro, Magdalena
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 82
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 0360-1315
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 51
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
