CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 78

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An interactive peer-assessment criteria development approach to improving students' art design performance using handheld devices

Lai, Chiu-Lin, Hwang, Gwo-Jen·2015·Computers & Education
DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.011

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 72

  1. Akinoglu, 2013, Effects of concept maps on students critical thinking skills in science education, Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 14, 1424
  2. Auttawutikul, 2014, Use of weblogs to enhance group learning and design creativity amongst students at a Thai University, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51, 378, 10.1080/14703297.2013.796723 · DOI
  3. Bonsignore, 2013, Sharing stories “in the Wild”: a mobile storytelling case study using StoryKit, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20, 10.1145/2491500.2491506 · DOI
  4. Boud, 1999, Peer learning and assessment, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 413, 10.1080/0260293990240405 · DOI
  5. Brader, 2014, Designing online assessment tools for disengaged youth, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18, 698, 10.1080/13603116.2013.817617 · DOI
  6. Carlson, 2008, Using computer-mediated peer review in an engineering design course, Transactions on Professional Communication, 51, 264, 10.1109/TPC.2008.2001254 · DOI
  7. Chang, 2010, Mobile-device-supported strategy for Chinese reading comprehension, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47, 69, 10.1080/14703290903525853 · DOI
  8. Chen, 2010, The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self- and peer-assessment system, Computers & Education, 55, 229, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.008 · DOI
  9. Chen, 2010, User acceptance of mobile knowledge management learning system: design and analysis, Educational Technology & Society, 13, 70
  10. Chen, 2009, Personalised context-aware ubiquitous learning system for supporting effective English vocabulary learning, Interactive Learning Environments, 18, 341, 10.1080/10494820802602329 · DOI
  11. Cho, 2010, Student revision with peer and expert reviewing, Learning and Instruction, 20, 328, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006 · DOI
  12. Chu, 2014, Potential negative effects of mobile learning on students' learning achievement and cognitive load – a format assessment perspective, Educational Technology & Society, 17, 332
  13. Chu, 2010, A knowledge engineering approach to developing mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning, Computers & Education, 54, 289, 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.023 · DOI
  14. Corbalan, 2010, Computer-based feedback in linear algebra: effects on transfer performance and motivation, Computers & Education, 55, 692, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.002 · DOI
  15. Denton, 2008, Students' response to traditional and computer-assisted formative feedback: a comparative case study, British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 486, 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00745.x · DOI
  16. Dkeidek, 2011, Effect of culture on high-school students' question-asking ability resulting from an inquiry-oriented chemistry laboratory, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 1305, 10.1007/s10763-010-9261-0 · DOI
  17. Donnelly, 2010, Interaction analysis in a ‘Learning by Doing’ problem-based professional development context, Computers & Education, 55, 1357, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.010 · DOI
  18. Groenendijk, 2013, Learning to be creative. The effects of observational learning on students' design products and processes, Learning and Instruction, 28, 35, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.001 · DOI
  19. Halverson, 2014, What makes a youth-produced film good? The youth audience perspective, Learning Media and Technology, 39, 386, 10.1080/17439884.2012.706222 · DOI
  20. Hardy, 2014, Student-generated content: enhancing learning through sharing multiple-choice questions, International Journal of Science Education, 36, 2180, 10.1080/09500693.2014.916831 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Hwang, 2014, Improving learning achievements, motivations and problem-solving skills through a peer assessment-based game development approach, Educational Technology Research and Development, 62, 129, 10.1007/s11423-013-9320-7 · DOI
  22. Hwang, 2012, A context-aware ubiquitous learning approach to conducting scientific inquiry activities in a science park, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 931, 10.14742/ajet.825 · DOI
  23. Hwang, 2008, Criteria, strategies and research issues of context-aware ubiquitous learning, Educational Technology & Society, 11, 81
  24. Hwang, 2011, An interactive concept map approach to supporting mobile learning activities for natural science courses, Computers & Education, 57, 2272, 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.011 · DOI
  25. Hwang, 2013, A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students' learning performance in natural science courses, Computers & Education, 69, 121, 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.008 · DOI
  26. Hyewon, 2014, Effects of mobile instant messaging on collaborative learning processes and outcomes: the case of South Korea, Educational Technology & Society, 17, 31
  27. Hyun, 2005, A study of 5-to 6-year-old children's peer dynamics and dialectical learning in a computer-based technology-rich classroom environment, Computers & Education, 44, 69, 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.01.004 · DOI
  28. Jenkins, 2004, Unfulfilled promise: formative assessment using computer-aided assessment, Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 67
  29. Jonassen, 1998, Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking, TechTrends, 43, 24, 10.1007/BF02818172 · DOI
  30. Jones, 2010, Net generation or digital natives: is there a distinct new generation entering university?, Computers & Education, 54, 722, 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022 · DOI
  31. Jordan, 2012, Student engagement with assessment and feedback: some lessons from short-answer free-text e-assessment questions, Computers & Education, 58, 818, 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.007 · DOI
  32. Juwah, 2003, Using peer assessment to develop skills and capabilities, Journal of United States Distance Learning Association, 17, 39
  33. Lin, 2011, Using reflective peer assessment to promote students' conceptual understanding through asynchronous discussions, Educational Technology & Society, 14, 178
  34. Lin, 2013, Data mining for providing a personalized learning path in creativity: an application of decision trees, Computers & Education, 68, 199, 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.009 · DOI
  35. Liu, 2014, Assessment training effects on student assessment skills and task performance in a technology-facilitated peer assessment, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 275, 10.1080/02602938.2013.823540 · DOI
  36. Llado, 2014, Student perceptions of peer assessment: an interdisciplinary study, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 592, 10.1080/02602938.2013.860077 · DOI
  37. Longfellow, 2008, ‘They had a way of helping that actually helped’: a case study of a peer-assisted learning scheme, Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 93, 10.1080/13562510701794118 · DOI
  38. Looi, 2010, Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: a research agenda, British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 154, 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00912.x · DOI
  39. Maas, 2014, Why peer assessment helps to improve clinical performance in undergraduate physical therapy education: a mixed methods design, Bmc Medical Education, 14, 117, 10.1186/1472-6920-14-117 · DOI
  40. Matsuno, 2009, Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments in Japanese university EFL writing classrooms, Language Testing, 26, 75, 10.1177/0265532208097337 · DOI
  41. McMahon, 2010, Combining peer-assessment with negotiated learning activities on a day-release undergraduate-level certificate course (ECTS level 3), Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 223, 10.1080/02602930902795919 · DOI
  42. Miller, 2010, Peer tutoring in reading: the effects of role and organization on two dimensions of self-esteem, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 417, 10.1348/000709909X481652 · DOI
  43. Mokhtari, 2002, Assessing students' meta-cognitive awareness of reading strategies, Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 249, 10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249 · DOI
  44. Ng, 2014, Using a mixed research method to evaluate the effectiveness of formative assessment in supporting student teachers' wiki authoring, Computers & Education, 73, 141, 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.016 · DOI
  45. Nicolaidou, 2013, E-portfolios supporting primary students' writing performance and peer feedback, Computers & Education, 68, 404, 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.004 · DOI
  46. Ogata, 2008, Supporting classroom activities with the BSUL system, Educational Technology & Society, 11, 1
  47. Paas, 2003, Cognitive load theory and instructional design: recent developments, Educational Psychologist, 38, 1, 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Peng, 2009, Ubiquitous knowledge construction: mobile learning re-defined and a conceptual framework, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 171, 10.1080/14703290902843828 · DOI
  49. Pintrich, 2003, A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts, Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667, 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667 · DOI
  50. Prins, 2005, Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment: a case study, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 417, 10.1080/02602930500099219 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Sandberg, 2014, The added value of a gaming context and intelligent adaptation for a mobile learning application for vocabulary learning, Computers & Education, 76, 119, 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.006 · DOI
  52. Schraw, 1994, Assessing meta-cognitive awareness, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460, 10.1006/ceps.1994.1033 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Segrist, 2006, Skills-building assessment of service-focused wellness assistantships, Educational Gerontology, 32, 185, 10.1080/03601270500476854 · DOI
  54. Shih, 2010, An inquiry-based Mobile learning approach to enhancing social science learning effectiveness, Educational Technology & Society, 13, 50
  55. Su, 2010, Evaluating the use of a wiki for collaborative learning, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47, 417, 10.1080/14703297.2010.518428 · DOI
  56. Sung, 2014, A prompt-based annotation approach to conducting mobile learning activities for architecture design courses, Computers & Education, 76, 80, 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.015 · DOI
  57. Sutopo, 2014, Impact of a representational approach on students' reasoning and conceptual understanding in learning mechanics, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 741, 10.1007/s10763-013-9431-y · DOI
  58. Topping, 1998, Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities, Review of Educational Research, 68, 249, 10.3102/00346543068003249 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Tsai, 2009, The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: the role of scientific epistemological views, Instructional Science, 37, 293, 10.1007/s11251-007-9047-0 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Tsivitanidou, 2012, Peer assessment among secondary school students: Introducing a peer feedback tool in the context of a computer supported inquiry learning environment in science, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 31, 433
  61. Tsuei, 2012, Using synchronous peer tutoring system to promote elementary students' learning in mathematics, Computers & Education, 58, 1171, 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.025 · DOI
  62. Wang, 2008, The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: the social cognitive perspective, Computers & Education, 51, 1589, 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.004 · DOI
  63. Wen, 2008, Online peer assessment in an in-service science and mathematics teacher education course, Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 55, 10.1080/13562510701794050 · DOI
  64. Wu, 2012, An innovative concept map approach for improving students' learning performance with an instant feedback mechanism, British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 217, 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01167.x · DOI
  65. Yang, 2010, Students' reflection on online self-correction and peer review to improve writing, Computers & Education, 55, 1202, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.017 · DOI
  66. Yang, 2006, A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class, Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179, 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Yang, 2010, Creativity of student information system projects: from the perspective of network embeddedness, Computers & Education, 54, 209, 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.004 · DOI
  68. Yang, 2014, An online adaptive learning environment for critical-thinking-infused English literacy instruction, British Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 723, 10.1111/bjet.12080 · DOI
  69. Yang, 2010, Development and evaluation of an interactive mobile learning environment with shared display groupware, Educational Technology & Society, 13, 195
  70. Yu, 2011, Multiple peer-assessment modes to augment online student question-generation processes, Computers & Education, 56, 484, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.025 · DOI
  71. Yu, 2013, Predictive effects of online peer feedback types on performance quality, Educational Technology & Society, 16, 332
  72. Zhang, 2010, Deconstructing and reconstructing: transforming primary science learning via a mobilized curriculum, Computers & Education, 55, 1504, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.016 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 78

Metadata

Authors
Lai, C.-L., & Hwang, G.-J.
ORCID
Hwang, Gwo-Jen
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
85
Pages
149-159
ISSN
0360-1315
DOI
10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.011
Cited by
78
References
5
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
National Science Council of the Republic of China (NSC 99-2511-S-011-011-MY3, NSC 100-2631-S-011-003)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review