Cited by 140Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Technology in LearningEducational Technology and E-Learning

A web‐based learning system for question‐posing and peer assessment

Yu, Fu‐Yun, Liu, Yu‐Hsin, Chan, Tak‐Wai·2005·Innovations in Education and Teaching International

Abstract

A web‐based learning system has been developed to facilitate question‐posing, peer‐assessing, item‐viewing and drill‐and‐practice learning activities. In this paper, the pedagogical basis underlying the design and development of the system is explained in the light of information‐processing theory, social construction of knowledge theory and social modelling theory. A preliminary study to evaluate the instructional potential of the system has been conducted; this has also identified the factors that influence students’ use of the system. Results taken from questionnaires and open‐ended questions revealed that by enabling students to play various roles such as composers, critics and adapters, the system was perceived as a cognition‐enhancing and motivational learning tool by the participants. Data analysis further indicated that various factors worked together to influence the performance of question‐posing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14703290500062557

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Balajthy E., 1984, Journal of Reading, 27, 408
  2. Bicanich E., 1997, Journal of Technological Horizons in Education, 25, 61
  3. Hung M. H., 2001, The effects of subtitles and captions on foreign language learning
  4. Malone T. W., 1987, Aptitude, learning, and instruction (vol. 3 Cognitive and affective process analyses), 223
  5. Slavin R., 1992, Interaction in cooperative groups, 145
  6. Zhang J., 2001, International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7, 33

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, F., Liu, Y., & Chan, T.
Affiliations
  • National Cheng Kung University (TW)
  • National Chi Nan University (TW)
  • National Central University (TW)
Corresponding author
Yu, Fu‐Yun
Venue
Innovations in Education and Teaching International
Published
2005-11
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
337-348
ISSN
  • 1470-3297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-3300
OpenAlex
W2089942811
Cited by
140
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Innovations in Education and Teaching International (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
Keywords
web-based learning system, question posing, peer assessment, drill and practice, information processing theory, social construction of knowledge, student motivation, student role, cognitive enhancement, instructional design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review