Cited by 3,199Educational Strategies and EpistemologiesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsMemory Processes and Influences

Assessing Metacognitive Awareness

Schraw, Gregory, Dennison, Rayne Sperling·1994·Contemporary Educational Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/ceps.1994.1033

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Venue
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-10
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
460-475
ISSN
0361-476X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020143450
Cited by
3,199
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 324 · 2025: 293 · 2024: 238 · 2023: 251 · 2022: 228 · 2021: 225 · 2020: 240 · 2019: 189 · 2018: 156 · 2017: 149 · 2016: 126 · 2015: 134 · 2014: 108 · 2013: 100 · 2012: 94
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Contemporary Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
metacognitive awareness, metacognition, knowledge of cognition, metacognitive regulation, reading comprehension, reading comprehension monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review