Cited by 25Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningOnline Learning and AnalyticsInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Delaying access to a problem-skipping option increases effortful practice: Application of an A/B test in large-scale online learning

Open access
Savi, Alexander O., Ruijs, Nienke M., Maris, Gunter K.J., van der Maas, Han L.J.·2018·Computers & Education

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We report on an online double-blind randomized controlled field experiment (A/B test) in Math Garden, a computer adaptive practice system with over 150,000 active primary school children.The experiment was designed to eliminate an unforeseen opportunity to practice with minimal effort.Some children tend to skip problems that require deliberate effort, and only attempt problems that they can spontaneously answer.The intervention delayed the option to skip a problem, thereby promoting effortful practice.The results reveal an increase in the exerted effort, without being at the expense of engagement.Whether the additional effort positively affected the children's learning gains could not be concluded.Finally, in addition to these substantial results, the experiment demonstrates some of the advantages of A/B tests, such as the unique opportunity to apply truly blind randomized field experiments in educational science. 2004).In this paper, we show that large-scale experiments in online learning environments, also referred to as A/B tests, can be used to solve some of these issues.We report on a successful application of an A/B test in a large-scale online computer-adaptive practice system for Dutch primary schools (Math Garden, with over 150,000 active users).In the A/B test we delayed the option to skip a problem.This option was used by some children to skip difficult problems and practice with minimal effort, and the delay was thus aimed at promoting more effortful practice.Before describing the experimental details, we first aim to build a basic understanding of A/B tests in relation to traditional educational experiments, introduce the online practice system that is central to the experiment, and then discuss our motivation for this particular intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.008

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interventions and randomized controlled field studies have manipulated self-concept or other motivation constructs, allowing for causal inferences.

    “There have also been interventions and randomized controlled field studies in which either self-concept or other motivation constructs were manipulated (e.g., Savi et al., 2018;Vansteenkiste et al., 2004), thereby allowing for causal inferences.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Vygotskii, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Savi, A. O., Ruijs, N. M., Maris, G. K. J., & van der Maas, H. L. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Cito (Netherlands) (NL)
Corresponding author
Savi, Alexander O.
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
119
Pages
84-94
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2781352358
Cited by
25
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (314-99-107)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
A/B testing, online learning, primary school mathematics, learning gains, student engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review