CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 45Academic integrity and plagiarismCybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesEducational Technology in Learning

Why students engage in cyber-cheating through a collective movement: A case of deviance and collusion

Open access
Parks, Rachida F., Lowry, Paul Benjamin, Wigand, Rolf T., Agarwal, Nitin, Williams, Therese L.·2018·Computers & Education
DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.003

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Online networks dedicated to facilitating academic malpractice are well documented.

    “In the context of academic integrity, the existence of online networks dedicated to facilitating academic malpractice is well documented (Monteiro et al., 2018; Parks et al., 2018), so a vulnerability could be shared and widely exploited in a matter of days.”

    From Generative AI detection in higher education assessments (2025) · cites this paper as Parks et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parks, R. F., Lowry, P. B., Wigand, R. T., Agarwal, N., & Williams, T. L.
Affiliations
  • Quinnipiac University (US)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University of Arkansas at Little Rock (US)
  • University of Central Oklahoma (US)
Corresponding author
Parks, Rachida F.
ORCID
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
125
Pages
308-326
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.003
OpenAlex
W2796908784
Cited by
45
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
6.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Funders
summer research grant program at Quinnipiac University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
Keywords
academic dishonesty, social networking sites, Facebook, collective action, deviance, collusion, social learning theory, ethical complexity, cultural complexity, Moroccan students, digital footprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review