Evaluating a tactile and a tangible multi-tablet gamified quiz system for collaborative learning in primary education
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Collaborative learning is a fundamental aspect of the learning process, as social interaction and collaboration contribute to greater engagement and enhanced learning outcomes.
“Collaborative learning is a fundamental aspect of the learning process, as social interaction and collaboration are key features of an educational environment that contribute to greater engagement and enhanced learning outcomes [37].”
From Fostering computational thinking in young students through student generated challenges in tangible mobile augmented reality games (2025) · cites this paper as [37]
Cites
A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games
Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004 · Cited by 2,890 · see citing works
Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019 · Cited by 1,918 · see citing works
Boyle, E. A., Hainey, T., Connolly, T. M., Gray, G., Earp, J., Ott, M., Lim, T., Ninaus, M., Ribeiro, C., & Pereira, J. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.003 · Cited by 1,133 · see citing works
Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning
(2012) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6 · Cited by 1,091 · see citing works
High-Stakes Testing & Student Learning
Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2002) · Education Policy Analysis Archives · doi:10.14507/epaa.v10n18.2002 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Learning with retrieval-based concept mapping.
Blunt, J. R., & Karpicke, J. D. (2014) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035934 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Exploring how children use their hands to think: an embodied interactional analysis
Antle, A. N. (2013) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2011.630415 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gardeli, A., & Vosinakis, S. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00899-4 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Garcia-Sanjuan, F., Jurdi, S., Jaen, J., & Nacher, V.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 123
- Pages
- 65-84
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2801759811
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 14.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
- RiuNet (Universitat Politècnica de València) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
- European Development Regional Fund (TIN2014-60077-R)
- Conselleria d’Educació, Cultura i Esport (ACIF/2014/214)
- Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sport (FPU14/00136)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- gamification, cooperative learning, tangible user interfaces, primary education, handheld devices, quizzes, user experience, consensus building, time management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review