Cited by 260Teaching and Learning ProgrammingEducational Robotics and EngineeringGender and Technology in Education

Learning to code or coding to learn? A systematic review

Popat, Shahira, Starkey, Louise·2019·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Popat, S., & Starkey, L.
Affiliations
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Corresponding author
Starkey, Louise
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
128
Pages
365-376
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2897616367
Cited by
260
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Robotics and Engineering
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
programming education, computer programming in schools, educational outcomes, mathematical problem solving, critical thinking, social skills, self-management, academic skills, instructional design, computational thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review