Cited by 195Education and Technology IntegrationJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

Teachers' ICT-related self-efficacy, job resources, and positive emotions: Their structural relations with autonomous motivation and work engagement

Open access
Moreira-Fontán, Eva, García-Señorán, Mar, Conde-Rodríguez, Ángeles, González, Antonio·2019·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.007

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Moreira-Fontán, E., García-Señorán, M., Conde-Rodríguez, Á., & González, A.
Affiliations
Universidade de Vigo (ES)
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
134
Pages
63-77
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2916462736
Cited by
195
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 3
FWCI
48.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
  • Investigo Institutional repository of UVigo (Universidade de Vigo) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
autonomous motivation, work engagement, positive emotions, job resources, institutional support for innovation, teacher motivation, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review