Cited by 120Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsOnline and Blended LearningVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Promoting learning in online, ill-structured problem solving: The effects of scaffolding type and metacognition level

Kim, Joo Yeun, Lim, Kyu Yon·2019·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.001

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, J. Y., & Lim, K. Y.
Affiliations
  • Kyung Hee University (KR)
  • Ewha Womans University (KR)
Corresponding author
Lim, Kyu Yon
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
138
Pages
116-129
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2944281545
Cited by
120
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
17.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
scaffolding, metacognition, cognitive presence, social presence, teaching presence, problem-solving performance, achievement, instructional design course, web-based learning environment, lesson plan design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review