Cited by 380Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia?

Azevedo, Roger, Moos, Daniel C., Greene, Jeffrey A., Winters, Fielding I., Cromley, Jennifer G.·2008·Educational Technology Research and Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11423-007-9067-0

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-monitoring tools are effective aids for students in learning environments.

    “Evidence from this study aligns with the existing literature on self-regulated learning and instructional scaffolding and underscores the potential of self-monitoring tools as effective aids for students in learning environments (Azevedo et al., 2008; Ga ˇ sevi ´ c et al., 2015, 2017).”

    From Impact of AI assistance on student agency (2024) · cites this paper as Azevedo et al., 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., & Cromley, J. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Memphis (US)
  • Gustavus Adolphus College (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Azevedo, Roger
Venue
Educational Technology Research and Development
Published
2007-09-29
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
45-72
ISSN
  • 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6501
OpenAlex
W2093529413
Cited by
380
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 21
FWCI
27.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Technology Research and Development (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
student self-regulation, hypermedia learning, cardiovascular system, adolescents, declarative knowledge, mental models, learning strategies, adaptive help-seeking, prior knowledge activation, science learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review