The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital game-based L2 learning outcomes for primary through high-school students: A systematic literature review
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The aim of this systematic literature review was to examine the empirical evidence for the effectiveness of digital games on second language learning between 2014 and 2018, with a focus on participants 6–18 years old. The initial search yielded 578 results, from which a total of 26 articles were included in the final content analysis. The analysis of the included studies revealed: (1) the majority of studies were conducted with a mixed methods design; (2) most studies used computers as the gaming platform; (3) the most common game genre was educational games or educational mini games; (5) most games were designed for learning; (4) research was mainly conducted in East Asia and the Middle East; (5) the primary context of study was within a formal learning environment; and (6) the target language was usually English. Further analysis suggests that digital learning games (DLGs) may benefit players' language acquisition, affective/psychological state, contemporary competences, and participatory behavior. An inductive analysis revealed six key game features highlighted within the studies that influenced the outcomes: ease-of-use, challenge (at one's zone of proximal development), rewards and feedback, control or autonomy, goal-orientation, and interactivity. In addition to game features, associations between context and outcomes were also explored: studies conducted within a formal learning environment, with or without teacher facilitation, resulted in mostly positive language acquisition results, meaning DLGs can be implemented successfully within schools. Based on the overall findings, it is clear that DLGs are an effective tool, but future research should explore how they can best be implemented in the classroom setting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Educationally, DGBVL has been found to enhance learner motivation and engagement as well as to promote higher interaction and autonomy [29,31,32].”
From The Effect of Multiplayer Video Games on Incidental and Intentional L2 Vocabulary Learning: The Case of Among Us (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 53,488
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Cohen, J. (1960) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446002000104 · Cited by 42,398
PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 · Cited by 26,223
Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience
Buchanan, R., & Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1991) · Design Issues · doi:10.2307/1511458 · Cited by 9,449
How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis
Bengtsson, M. (2016) · NursingPlus Open · doi:10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001 · Cited by 4,616 · cited 2×
“The analyzed data included both manifest and latent content; manifest content is easily observed, while latent content is more di ffi cult to analyze since the analyst must look below the surface at the underlying meaning (Bengtsson, 2016; Potter & Levine-Donnerstein, 1999).”
BackgroundMethodA systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games
Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004 · Cited by 2,890
Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045 · Cited by 1,713
Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis
Potter, W. J., & Levine‐Donnerstein, D. (1999) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909889909365539 · Cited by 1,662
Video Games and the Future of Learning
Shaffer, D. W., Squire, K. D., Halverson, R., & Gee, J. P. (2005) · Phi Delta Kappan · doi:10.1177/003172170508700205 · Cited by 1,133
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Mazaji, 2016, Effects of digital games on vocabulary acquisition of Iranian low proficiency male and female EFL learners, Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 6, 151
- Utku, 2018, Teaching EFL vocabulary to young digital natives through Online, International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 5, 115
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Indonesia Education Readiness Conducting Distance Learning in Covid-19 Pandemic Situation
Churiyah, M., Sholikhan, S., Filianti, F., & Sakdiyyah, D. A. (2020) · International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding · doi:10.18415/ijmmu.v7i6.1833 · Cited by 389
Hui, H. B., & Mahmud, M. S. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1105806 · Cited by 296
The effects of competition in digital game-based learning (DGBL): a meta-analysis
Chen, C., Shih, C.-C., & Law, V. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09794-1 · Cited by 179
The effectiveness of gamification in programming education: Evidence from a meta-analysis
Zhan, Z., He, L., Tong, Y., Liang, X., Guo, S., & Lan, X. (2022) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100096 · Cited by 189
Digital Language Learning (DLL): Insights from Behavior, Cognition, and the Brain
Li, P., & Lan, Y. (2021) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728921000353 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Acquah, E. O., & Katz, H. T.
- Affiliations
- Åbo Akademi University (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Acquah, Emmanuel O.
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 143
- Pages
- 103667
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2969402346
- Semantic Scholar
- beefa30b97f709a43b936bde9361b0974c65780f
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 16
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.abo.fi
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
- Åbo Akademi University Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
- Keywords
- video games, second language acquisition, game-based learning, language acquisition, game features, zone of proximal development, learner autonomy, affective learning outcomes, formal learning environments, teacher as facilitator, English as a second language
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
