CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 278Mobile Learning in EducationTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourEnglish Language Learning and Teaching

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding higher education learners' acceptance and use of mobile devices for language learning: A Rasch-based path modeling approach

Open access
Hoi, Vo Ngoc·2020·Computers & Education
DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103761
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103761

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 96 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Chan, 2011, Students' perceptions of and attitudes towards podcast-based learning: A comparison of two language podcast projects, Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8, 312
  2. Linacre, 2002, What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean?, Rasch Measurement Transactions, 16, 878
  3. Wagner, 2005, Disconnected: Why learning professionals need to care about mobile learning, American Society for Training and Development, 43, 40
  4. Wu, 2011, Ubiquitous English learning system with dynamic personalized guidance of learning portfolio, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14, 164

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–278 of 278

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hoi, V. N.
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
146
Pages
103761
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103761
OpenAlex
W2989694933
Cited by
250
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 19
FWCI
33.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
  • Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) (submittedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
mobile-assisted language learning, technology acceptance, UTAUT, higher education learners, language learning, attitudes, performance expectancy, behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, mobile devices, developing countries, Vietnam

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review