The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What matters in AI-supported learning: A study of human-AI interactions in language learning using cluster analysis and epistemic network analysis
Abstract
This study investigates how students interact with artificial intelligence (AI) for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning and what matters in AI-supported EFL learning. It was conducted in naturalistic learning settings, involving sixteen primary school students and lasting approximately three months. The students ’ usage data of an AI agent and their reflection essays about the interactions with the AI agent were analyzed using cluster analysis and epistemic network analysis based on the frameworks of community of inquiry and students ’ approaches to learning. The results suggest four clusters of students, each with its distinct way of interacting with AI for language learning. More importantly, the comparisons of the four clusters of students reveal that even in AI-supported learning, not everyone can benefit from the potential promised by AI. The deep approach to AI-supported learning may amplify the benefits of AI ’ s personalized guidance and strengthen the sense of the human-AI learning community. Passively or mechanically following AI ’ s instruction, albeit with high levels of participation, may decrease the sense of the human-AI learning community and eventually lead to low performance. This study contributes to and has implications for the educational implementation of AI, as well as the facilitation and graphical representation of learner-AI interactions in educational
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-4558 · Cited by 10,474
Teaching for quality learning at university
Boulton‐Lewis, G. M. (2008) · Faculty of Education · Cited by 4,926
Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001 · Cited by 1,653
Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2 · Cited by 1,474
The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003 · Cited by 1,219
Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787404040463 · Cited by 991
Biggs, J. (1993) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01038.x · Cited by 963
Shaffer, D. W., Collier, W., & Ruis, A. R. (2016) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2016.33.3 · Cited by 811
The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning
Thompson, P. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022 · Cited by 557
Exploring AI chatbot affordances in the EFL classroom: young learners’ experiences and perspectives
Jeon, J. (2024) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2021.2021241 · Cited by 433
Cited by
Jeon, J., & Lee, S. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11834-1 · Cited by 696
Wang, X., Li, L., Tan, S. C., Yang, L., & Lei, J. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107798 · Cited by 336
Self-citationEssel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D., Essuman, A. B., & Amankwa, J. O. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100198 · Cited by 296
AI and English language teaching: Affordances and challenges
Crompton, H., Edmett, A., Ichaporia, N., & Burke, D. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13460 · Cited by 282
Rad, H. S., Alipour, R., & Jafarpour, A. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2208170 · Cited by 214
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X., Liu, Q., Pang, H., Tan, S. C., Lei, J., Wallace, M. P., & Li, L.
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-03
- Volume
- 194
- Pages
- 104703
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4311091827
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 48.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What matters in AI-supported learning: A study of human-AI interactions in language learning using cluster analysis and epistemic network analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104703
- The paper
- Wang, X., Liu, Q., Pang, H., Tan, S. C., Lei, J., Wallace, M. P., & Li, L. (2023). What matters in AI-supported learning: A study of human-AI interactions in language learning using cluster analysis and epistemic network analysis. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104703
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.